UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A

(Rule 14a-101)

INFORMATION REQUIRED IN PROXY STATEMENT

SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities

Exchange Act of 1934

Filed by the Registrantþ

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant¨

Check the appropriate box:

¨Preliminary Proxy Statement

þDefinitive Proxy Statement

¨Definitive Additional Materials

¨Soliciting Material Pursuant to Rule 14a-12

¨Confidential, for the Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))

ITT Corporation

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

þNo fee required.

¨Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.

(1)Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

(2)Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

(3)Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (Set(set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

(4)Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

(5)Total fee paid:

¨Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

¨Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.

(1)Amount Previously Paid:

(2)Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

(3)Filing Party:

(4)Date Filed:



LOGO







2016
Notice of Annual Meeting
& Proxy Statement
ITT Corporation






2013
March 28, 2016 Notice of Annual Meeting
& Proxy Statement

ITT Corporation


LOGO

March 27, 2013

Denise L. Ramos

Chief Executive Officer and President

ITT Corporation

1133 Westchester Avenue

White Plains, NY 10604-3543

10604


Dear Fellow Shareholders:

Enclosed are

On behalf of the Board of Directors of ITT Corporation, I cordially invite you to attend our 2016 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, which will be held on Wednesday, May 11, 2016 at 9:00 a.m. Eastern Daylight Time at ITT Corporation Headquarters, 1133 Westchester Avenue, White Plains, NY 10604.
At this year’s meeting, you will be asked to vote on the election of directors, to ratify the appointment of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, to reapprove the performance measures in the 2011 Omnibus Incentive Plan, to cast an advisory vote related to ITT’s executive compensation program and to consider a shareholder proposal, if properly presented at the meeting.
Attached you will find a Notice of 2016 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and Proxy Statement for ITT’s 2013 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. This year’sthat contain more information about these proposals and the meeting is intendeditself, including:
How to address onlyobtain admission to the business included on the agenda. Details of the businessmeeting if you plan to be conducted at the Annual Meeting are given in the accompanying Notice of Annual Meetingattend; and Proxy Statement, which provides information required
Different methods you can use to vote your proxy, including by applicable lawsInternet and regulations.

Yourtelephone.

Every shareholder vote is important and weimportant. We encourage you to vote whether you are a registered owner or a beneficial owner.

This year, in accordance with U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission rules, we are again using the Internet as our primary means of furnishing proxy materials to shareholders. Because we are using the Internet, most shareholders will not receive paper copies of our proxy materials. We will instead send these shareholders a notice with instructions for accessing the proxy materials and voting via the Internet. This notice also provides information on how shareholders may obtain paper copies of our proxy materialspromptly, even if they so choose. We believe use of the Internet makes the proxy distribution process more efficient, less costly and helps in conserving natural resources.

If you are the registered owner of ITT common stock, you may vote your shares by making a toll-free telephone call or using the Internet. Details of these voting options are explained in the Proxy Statement. If you choose to receive paper copies of our proxy materials, you can vote by completing and returning the enclosed proxy card by mail as soon as possible.

If you are a beneficial owner and someone else, such as your bank, broker or trustee is the owner of record, the owner of record will communicate with you about how to vote your shares.

Whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, please vote as soon as possible. If you are a registered owner of ITT common stockMeeting. We appreciate your participation and do not plan to voteyour ongoing interest in person at the Annual Meeting, you may vote via the Internet, by telephone or, if you receive a paper proxy card in the mail, by mailing the completed proxy card. Voting by any of these methods will ensure your representation at the Annual Meeting. Your vote is important.

ITT.



Sincerely,

LOGO

    
Denise L. Ramos
Chief Executive Officer and President


LOGO

March 27, 2013



NOTICE OF 2013 Annual Meeting

2016 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
Time: 
Date and TimeWednesday, May 11, 2016 at 9:00 a.m. Eastern Daylight Time on Tuesday, May 7, 2013
Place:PlaceITT Corporation Headquarters, 1133 Westchester Avenue, White Plains, NY 10604
Items of Business: 

1. Election

Items of BusinessŸTo elect the eight10 nominees named in the attached Proxy Statement as members ofto the Board of Directors.

Directors, to serve until the 2017 annual meeting of shareholders or until their respective successors shall have been duly elected and qualified.
Ÿ

2. Ratification ofTo ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as ITT’s Independent Registered Public Accounting Firmthe Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2013.

the 2016 fiscal year.
Ÿ

To conduct an advisory vote on the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers.
Ÿ

3. Approval of the material terms ofTo reapprove performance measures in the ITT Corporation Annual2011 Omnibus Incentive Plan for Executive Officers.

Plan.
Ÿ
To consider a shareholder proposal, if properly presented at the Annual Meeting.
Ÿ

4. To approve, in a non-binding vote, the 2012 compensation of our named executive officers.

5. To transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting.

Annual Meeting or any adjournments or postponements thereof.
Who May Vote: You can vote if you were a shareholder
Who Can Vote, Record DateHolders of record of ITT Corporation common stock at the close of business on March 13, 2013,14, 2016 are entitled to vote at the record date.Annual Meeting and any adjournments or postponements thereof.
Annual Report to Shareholders and Annual Report on Form 10-K: Copies of our 2012 Annual Report on Form 10-K and Annual Report to Shareholders are provided to shareholders.
Mailing or Availability Date:DateBeginning on or about March 27, 2013,28, 2016, this Notice of Annual Meeting and the 20132016 Proxy Statement are being mailed or made available, as the case may be, to shareholders of record on March 13, 2013.14, 2016.
About Proxy Voting: Your vote
About Proxy Voting
It is important. Proxy voting permits shareholders unable to attend the Annual Meeting to vote their shares through a proxy. Most shareholders are unable to attend the Annual Meeting. By appointing a proxy,important that your shares will be represented and voted in accordance with your instructions. If you do not provide instructions on how to vote,at the proxies will vote as recommended by the Board of Directors. Most shareholders will not receive paper copies of our proxy materials and can vote their shares by following the Internet voting instructions provided on the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials.Annual Meeting. If you are a registered owner and requestedshareholder, you may vote online at www.proxyvote.com, by telephone or by mailing a paper copy ofproxy card. You may also vote in person at the proxy materials,Annual Meeting. If you canhold shares through a bank, broker or other institution, you may vote your shares by proxy by


completing and returning your proxy card or by following the Internet or telephone voting instructions provided on the proxy card. Beneficial owners who received or requested a paper copy of the proxy materials may vote their shares by submitting voting instructions by completing and returning their voting instruction form or by following the Internet or telephone voting instructions providedany method specified on the voting instruction form. You can changeform that they provide. See details under “How do I vote?” under “Information about Voting” below. We encourage you to vote your voting instructions or revoke your proxy at any time prior to the Annual Meeting by following the instructions on pages 1 to 5 of this Proxy Statement and on the proxy card.
Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Shareholder Meeting to be held on Tuesday, May 7, 2013, at 9:00 a.m. at ITT Corporation Headquarters, 1133 Westchester Avenue, White Plains, NY 10604. The Company’s 2013 Proxy Statement, 2012 Annual Report on Form 10-K and Annual Report to Shareholders will be available online at https://www.proxydocs.com/itt.shares as soon as possible.

By order of the Board of Directors,

Lori B. Marino
Corporate Secretary
March 28, 2016

IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR
ITT Corporation’s Annual Meeting of Shareholders
to be held on Wednesday, May 11, 2016, at 9:00 a.m. EDT
The Proxy Statement and Annual Report are available online at
www.proxyvote.com





TABLE OF CONTENTS
SectionPage
LOGO

Burt M. Fealing

Senior Vice President,
General Counsel and Secretary


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page

1

Householding of Proxy Materials

4

Internet Availability of Proxy Materials

5

Stock Ownership Information

5

6

Equity Compensation Plan Information

7

19

Governance Principles

21

21

25

Board and Committee Meetings and Membership

34

36

37

Compensation Committee Report

39

40

60

60

61

62

64

67

70

71

20122015 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation

73

A-1

Appendix B — ITT Corporation Annual Incentive Plan for Executive Officers

B-1A 



2013



ITT Corporation
1133 Westchester Avenue
White Plains, NY 10604

Proxy Statement

This Proxy Statement is furnished to the shareholders of record of ITT Corporation, an Indiana corporation (the “Company,” “ITT,” “we,” “us” or “our”), in connection with the solicitation of proxies on behalf of the Board of Directors of the Company, for use at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on May 11, 2016 (the “Annual Meeting”). The Annual Meeting will be held at 9:00 a.m. Eastern Daylight Time at ITT Corporation Headquarters, 1133 Westchester Avenue, White Plains, NY 10604.
Why did I receive these proxy materials?    Beginning on or about March 27, 2013,28, 2016, this Proxy Statement is being mailed or made available, as the case may be, to shareholders who were shareholders as of March 13, 2013,14, 2016, the record date, as part of the Board of Directors’ solicitation of proxies for ITT’s 2013the Annual Meeting, andincluding any postponementsadjournments or adjournmentspostponements thereof. This Proxy Statement and ITT’s 20122015 Annual Report to Shareholders and Annual Report on Form 10-K (which have been furnished to shareholders eligible to vote at the 2013 Annual Meeting) contain information that the Board of Directors believes offers an informed view of ITT Corporation (herein referredis relevant to as “ITT” orshareholders in voting on the “Company”) and meetsmatters to be addressed at the regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) for proxy solicitations.Annual Meeting.

Who is entitled to vote?    You can vote if you owned shares of the Company’s common stock as of the close of business on March 13, 2013,14, 2016, the record date.

What itemsHow do I get admitted to the Annual Meeting?    Only shareholders of businessrecord or beneficial owners of the Company’s common stock as of the record date may attend the Annual Meeting in person. You will Ineed an admission ticket or proof of ownership to enter the Annual Meeting. An admission ticket is attached to your proxy card if you hold shares directly in your name as a shareholder of record. If you received a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (a “Notice”), your Notice is your admission ticket. We encourage you to vote your proxy as soon as possible, even if you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, but please keep the admission ticket and bring it with you to the Annual Meeting.
If your shares are held beneficially in the name of a broker, bank or other holder of record, you must present proof of your ownership of common stock, such as a bank or brokerage account statement, to be voting on?    Youadmitted to the Annual Meeting. Please note that if you plan to attend the Annual Meeting in person and would like to vote there, you will need to bring a legal proxy from your broker, bank or other holder of record as explained below. If your shares are voting onheld beneficially and you would rather have an admission ticket, you can obtain one in advance by mailing a written request, along with proof of your ownership of common stock, to:
ITT Corporation
1133 Westchester Avenue
White Plains, NY 10604
Attn: Corporate Secretary
The proponent of a shareholder proposal included in this Proxy Statement should notify the following itemsCompany in writing of business, which are described on pages 8the individual authorized to 19:present the proposal at the Annual Meeting; this notification should be received at least two weeks before the Annual Meeting.
Shareholders also must present a form of photo identification, such as a driver’s license, in order to be admitted to the Annual Meeting.

1.Election of the eight nominees named in the attached Proxy Statement as members of the Board of Directors.

2.Ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP (“Deloitte”) as ITT’s Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for 2013.

3.Approval of the material terms of the ITT Corporation Annual Incentive Plan for Executive Officers.

4.Approval, in a non-binding vote, of the 2012 compensation of our named executive officers (“NEOs”).

5.To transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting.

No cameras, recording equipment, large bags or packages will be permitted in the Annual Meeting.



1



Information about Voting

How do I vote?Shareholders may vote using any of the following methods:
By telephone or on the Internet
You can vote by calling the toll-free telephone number on your proxy card or Notice. Please have your proxy card or Notice handy when you call. Easy-to-follow voice prompts allow you to vote your shares and confirm that your instructions have been properly recorded.
The website for Internet voting is www.proxyvote.com. Please have your proxy card or Notice handy when you go online. As with telephone voting, you can confirm that your instructions have been properly recorded. If you vote on the Internet, you also can request electronic delivery of future proxy materials.
Telephone and Internet voting facilities for shareholders of record will be available 24 hours a day and will close at 11:59 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time on May 10, 2016. The availability of telephone and Internet voting for beneficial owners will depend on the voting processes of your broker, bank or other holder of record. Therefore, the Company recommends that you follow the voting instructions in the materials you receive.
If you vote by telephone or on the Internet, you do not need to return your proxy card.
By mail
If you received your Annual Meeting materials by mail, you may complete, sign and date the proxy card or voting instruction card and return it in the prepaid envelope. If you are a registered owner,shareholder of record and you can eitherreturn your signed proxy card but do not indicate your voting preferences, the persons named in the proxy card will vote the shares represented by that proxy as recommended by the Board of Directors.
In person at the Annual Meeting
All shareholders may vote in person at the Annual Meeting orMeeting. You may also be represented by proxy whether or not you attendanother person at the Annual Meeting.Meeting by executing a proper proxy designating that person. If you are a beneficial owner of shares, you must obtain a legal proxy from your broker, bank or other holder of record and present it to the inspectors of election with your ballot to be able to vote at the Annual Meeting. We encourage you to vote as soon as possible, even if you intend to attend the Annual Meeting in person.
By granting a proxy or submitting voting instructions
You may vote by granting a proxy or, for shares held in street name, by submitting voting instructions to your bank, broker trustee or other nominee.holder of record.
What is the difference between a registered owner and a beneficial owner?  If your shares are registered in your name with ITT’s transfer agent, Wells Fargo Shareholder Services, you are a beneficial“registered owner, and” also sometimes referred to as the “shareholder of record” of those shares.
If your shares are held in a stock brokerage account or by a bank or brokerage account,other holder of record, you will needare considered the “beneficial owner” of those shares, and this Proxy Statement and any accompanying documents have been provided to obtain a proxy, executed inyou by your favor, from yourbroker, bank or other holder of record. As the beneficial owner, you have the right to direct your broker, to be ablebank or other holder of record how to vote in person at the Annual Meeting. If you are a beneficial owner and your shares are held through anyby using the voting instruction card or by following their instructions for voting by telephone or on the Internet.
How many votes do I have?    You have one vote for every share of common stock that you own as of the ITT savings plans for salaried or hourly employees, your shares cannot be voted in person at the Annual Meeting.record date.

What are the proxy voting procedures?    If you vote by proxy, you can vote by following the voting procedures on the proxy card. You may vote:

Ÿ

By the Internet,

Ÿ

By Telephone, by calling from the United States, or

Ÿ

By Mail.

Why does the Board solicit proxies from shareholders?Since it is impractical for all shareholders to attend the Annual Meeting and vote in person, the Board of Directors recommends that you appoint the threetwo people named on the accompanying proxy card to act as your proxies at the 2013 Annual Meeting.



2



How do the proxies vote?    The proxies vote your shares in accordance with your voting instructions. If you appoint the proxies but do not provide voting instructions, they will vote as recommended by the Board of Directors. If any other matters not described in this Proxy StatementWhat items are properly brought before the meeting for a vote, the proxies will use their discretion in deciding how to vote on those matters.

How many votes do I have?    You have one vote for every share of ITT common stock that you own.

How does the Board of Directors recommend that I vote on the proposals?    The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR the election of each of the nominees of the Board of Directors (Item 1), FOR the ratification of the appointment of Deloitte as ITT’s Independent Registered Public Accounting Firmagenda for 2012 (Item 2), FOR the approval of the material terms of the ITT Corporation Annual Incentive Plan for Executive Officers (Item 3), and FOR the approval of the 2012 compensation of our NEOs (Item 4).

What if I change my mind?    You can revoke your proxy at any time before it is exercised by mailing a new proxy card with a later date or casting a new vote by the Internet or telephone, as applicable. You can also send a written revocation to the Secretary at the address listed on the first page of the Proxy Statement. If you come to the Annual Meeting, you can ask that the proxy you submitted earlier not be used.Meeting?

What is a “broker non-vote”?    The New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) has rules that govern brokers who have record ownership of listed company stock held in brokerage accounts for their clients who beneficially own the shares. Under these rules, brokers who do not receive voting instructions from their clients have the discretion to vote uninstructed shares on certain matters (“discretionary matters”) but do not have discretion to vote uninstructed shares as to certain other matters (“non-discretionary matters”). A broker may return a proxy card on behalf of a beneficial owner from whom the broker has not received instructions that casts a vote with regard to discretionary matters but expressly states that the broker is not voting as to non-discretionary matters. The broker’s inability to vote with respect to the non-discretionary matters to which the broker has not received instructions from the beneficial owner is referred to as a “broker non-vote.” Under current NYSE interpretations, agenda Item 2, the ratification of Deloitte as the Company’s Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, is considered a discretionary item. Your broker does not have discretion to vote your shares held in street name on Items 1, 3, or 4, each of which is considered a non-discretionary item. Under Indiana law, the law of the state where the Company is incorporated, broker non-votes and abstentions are counted to determine whether there is a quorum present.

There are fourfive formal items scheduled to be voted upon at the Annual Meeting as described on page 1.in the Notice of 2016 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. As of the date of this Proxy Statement, there are no other matters that the Board of Directors is not aware of any businessintends to present, or has reason to believe others will present, at the Annual Meeting. If you have returned your signed and completed proxy card and other thanmatters are properly presented for voting at the Annual Meeting, the people named on the accompanying proxy card (or, if applicable, their substitutes), will have the discretion to vote on those matters for you.

How will my shares be voted at the Annual Meeting?    At the Annual Meeting, the people named on the accompanying proxy card (or if applicable, their substitutes), will vote your shares as described in this Proxy Statement thatyou instruct. If you sign your proxy card and return it without indicating how you would like to vote your shares, your shares will be presented for a vote atvoted as the 2013 Annual Meeting.

How many votes are required to elect Directors? How many votes are required for other agenda items to pass?    The Restated ArticlesBoard of IncorporationDirectors recommends, which is:

1.FOR the election of the 10 nominees nominated to the Board of Directors and named in this Proxy Statement, to serve until the 2017 annual meeting of shareholders or until their respective successors shall have been duly elected and qualified;
2.FOR the ratification of Deloitte & Touche LLP (“Deloitte”) as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the 2016 fiscal year;
3.FOR the approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers;
4. FOR the reapproval of the performance measures under the ITT Corporation authorize2011 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “2011 Plan”);
5. AGAINST the Company’s By-laws to provide for majority voting for Directors in uncontested elections,shareholder proposal regarding a payout policy; and such By-laws further provide that in uncontested elections,
6.Otherwise in accordance with the judgment of the persons voting the proxy on any other matter properly brought before the Annual Meeting.
What if I change my mind?    As a Director nominee shall be electedholder of record of common stock, you may revoke or change your proxy at any time before the Annual Meeting by filing a majoritynotice of revocation or another signed, later-dated proxy card with the votes cast. The By-laws provide that in uncontested elections, any Director nominee who fails to be elected by a majority, but who also is a Director at the time, shall promptly provide a written resignation, as a holdover Director, to the Chairman of the Board or the Secretary. The Nominating and Governance Committee (or the equivalent committee then in existence) shall promptly consider the resignation and all relevant facts and circumstances concerning any vote and the best interestsCorporate Secretary of the Company, and its shareholders. The Board will actat the Company’s principal executive offices as listed on the Nominatingfirst page of this Proxy Statement. You may also revoke your proxy by attending the Annual Meeting and Governance Committee’s recommendation no later than its next regularly scheduled Board meetingvoting in person. If you are a beneficial holder of common stock, you should follow the voting directions you will receive from your broker, bank or within 90 days after certificationother holder of record along with the shareholderCompany’s proxy solicitation materials. As previously noted, you will need a legal proxy from your broker, bank or other holder of record if you prefer to cast your vote whichever is earlier, andin person at the Board will promptly publicly disclose its decision and the reasons for its decision. This means that in an uncontested election, to be elected as a Director of ITT, each of the eight director candidates must receive a majority of votes cast.

Item 2, Item 3, and Item 4 of the proposed agenda items require that the votes cast in favor of the proposal exceed the votes cast against the proposal. Item 2 and Item 4 are advisory in nature and are non-binding. Item 3, the approval of the material terms of the ITT Corporation Annual Incentive Plan

for Executive Officers is subject to the approval requirements of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, which requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast. Accordingly, abstentions will have no effect on the outcome of Item 3. Abstentions will also have no effect on the outcomes of Item 1, Item 2 or Item 4. In addition, broker non-votes will have no effect on the outcomes of Item 1, Item 3 or Item 4.

Meeting.

How many shares of ITT stock are outstanding?    As of March 13, 2013,14, 2016, the record date, 92,069,28589,829,277 shares of ITT common stock were outstanding.

How many holders of ITT outstanding shares must be present to hold the Annual Meeting?    In order to conduct business at the Annual Meeting, it is necessary to have a quorum. To have a quorum, shareholders entitled to cast a majority of votes at the Annual Meeting must be present in person or by proxy.

How do I vote?    With respect to agenda Items 1, 2, 3, The inspectors of election appointed for the Annual Meeting will separately tabulate all affirmative and 4 you may votenegative votes, abstentions and “broker non-votes.” Abstentions and broker non-votes are counted as present for againstpurposes of determining the presence or abstain from voting.absence of a quorum for the transaction of business.

What is the difference betweena “broker non-vote”?    If you are a beneficial owner and a registered owner?    Ifwhose shares you own are held of record by a broker, you must instruct the broker how to vote your shares with respect to certain items of business. If you do not provide voting instructions, your shares will not be voted on any item of business on which the broker does not have discretionary authority to vote. This is called a broker non-vote. In these cases, the broker can register your shares as being present at the Annual Meeting for purposes of determining the presence of a quorum but will not be able to vote on those matters for which specific authorization is required under the rules of the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”).
If you are a beneficial owner whose shares are held of record by a broker, your broker has discretionary voting authority under NYSE rules to vote your shares on the ratification of Deloitte as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, even if the broker does not receive voting instructions from you. However, your broker does not have discretionary authority to vote on the election of directors, the advisory vote on the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers or the shareholder proposal without instructions from you, in an ITT savings plan for salaried or hourly employees,which case a broker non-vote will occur and your shares will not be voted on these items of business.
If you hold shares of common stock brokerage account,through a broker, bank or by anotherother holder of record, follow the voting instructions you receive from that organization.


3



How many votes are consideredrequired to elect Directors? How many votes are required for other agenda items to pass?
Election of Directors.   The Company’s Amended and Restated By-laws (the “By-laws”) provide that in uncontested elections, a director nominee shall be elected by a majority of the “beneficial owner”votes cast by the shareholders represented in person or by proxy at the Annual Meeting. A “majority of the votes cast” means that the number of votes cast “for” a director must exceed the number of votes cast “against” that director (with abstentions and broker non-votes not counted as votes cast with respect to that director). The By-laws further provide that in uncontested elections, any director nominee who fails to be elected by a majority, but who also is a director at the time, shall promptly provide a written conditional resignation, as a holdover director, to the Chairman of the Board or the Corporate Secretary, and remain a director until a successor is elected and qualified. The Nominating and Governance Committee shall promptly consider the resignation and all relevant facts and circumstances concerning any vote and the best interests of the Company and its shareholders. After consideration, the Nominating and Governance Committee shall make a recommendation to the Board whether to accept or reject the tendered resignation, or whether other action should be taken. The Board will act on the Nominating and Governance Committee’s recommendation no later than its next regularly scheduled Board meeting (after certification of the shareholder vote) or within 90 days after certification of the shareholder vote, whichever is earlier, and the Board will promptly publicly disclose its decision and the reasons for its decision. As discussed above, brokers (and the many banks and other record holders of “street name” shares that follow the applicable NYSE voting rules for member brokers) do not have discretionary voting power with respect to director elections unless they have customer voting instructions. This means that, without your voting instructions on this matter, a broker non-vote will occur because someone else holdsyour broker (or bank or other holder of record) does not have the power to vote your shares on the election of directors. As a result, it is very important that you return voting instructions relating to the election of directors to your behalf. Ifbroker, bank or other holder of record.
All Other Matters.   The proposal ratifying the shares you own are held in a Morgan Stanley Smith Barney account for restricted shares orselection of the Company’s independent registered in your name directly with The Bankpublic accounting firm, the proposal to reapprove the performance measures under the 2011 Plan, the proposal to conduct an advisory vote on the compensation of New York Mellon, our transfer agent, you are the registered ownerCompany’s named executive officers and the “shareholdershareholder proposal each require that the votes cast in favor of record.”the proposal exceed the votes cast against the proposal. The proposals relating to the selection of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers and the shareholder proposal are each advisory in nature and non-binding. If you abstain from voting or if there is a broker non-vote on any matter, your abstention or broker non-vote will not affect the outcome of such vote, because abstentions and broker non-votes are not considered to be votes cast.

How do I vote if I am a participant in ITT’s savings plans for salaried or hourly employees?the ITT Retirement Savings Plan?   If you participate in any of the ITT savings plans for salaried or hourly employees,Retirement Savings Plan (formerly the ITT Corporation Retirement Savings Plan), your plan trustee will vote the ITT shares credited to your savings planITT Retirement Savings Plan account in accordance with your voting instructions, except as otherwise provided in accordance with the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”). The trustee voteswill vote the shares on your behalf because you are the beneficial owner, not the shareholder of record, of the savings plan shares.shares held by the ITT Retirement Savings Plan. The trustee votes the savings plan shares held in your ITT Retirement Savings Plan account for which no voting instructions are received (“Undirected Shares”) in the same proportion as the shares for which the trustee receives voting instructions, except as otherwise provided in accordance with ERISA. Under the savings plans,ITT Retirement Savings Plan, participants are “named fiduciaries” to the extent of their authority to direct the voting of ITT shares credited to their savings plan accounts and their proportionate share of Undirected Shares. By submitting voting instructions by telephone, the Internet or by signing and returning the voting instruction card, you direct the trustee of the savings plansITT Retirement Savings Plan to vote these shares, in person or by proxy at the Annual Meeting. ITT salaried or hourly planRetirement Savings Plan participants should mail their confidential voting instruction card to Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. (“Broadridge”), acting as tabulation agent, or vote by telephone or Internet. Instructions must be received by Broadridge no later than 11:59 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time on May 2, 2013.8, 2016.

I participate in the ITT savings plan for salaried employees and am a shareholder of record of shares of ITT common stock. How many proxy cards will I receive?    You will receive only one proxy card. Your savings plan shares and any shares you own as the shareholder of record, including ownership through the ITT Direct Purchase, Sale and Dividend Reinvestment Plan, will be set out separately on the proxy card.

How many shares are held by participants in the ITT employee savings plans?Retirement Savings Plan?   As of March 13, 2013,14, 2016, the record date, J.P. Morgan Chase, as the trustee for both the employee salaried savings plan and the hourly employee savings plans,ITT Retirement Savings Plan held 198,747211,794 shares of ITT common stock (approximately 0.22%0.24% of the outstanding shares) for the salaried plan, and 40,940 shares of ITT common stock (approximately 0.04%. J.P. Morgan Chase is trustee of the outstanding shares) for the hourly plans.ITT Retirement Savings Plan.

Who counts the votes? Is my vote confidential?    Representatives of Broadridge count   In accordance with the votes. Representatives of BroadridgeBy-laws, the Company will act asappoint two Inspectors of Election, forwho may be officers or employees of the 2013 Annual Meeting.Company, and they will tabulate the votes. The Inspectors of Election monitor the voting and also certify whether the votes of shareholders are kept in confidence in compliance with ITT’s confidential voting policy.



4



Who payswill pay for the cost of this proxy solicitation cost?solicitation?   ITT payswill pay the cost of soliciting proxies from registered owners. ITT has appointed Innisfree M&A Incorporated to help with the solicitation effort. ITT will pay Innisfree M&A Incorporated a fee of $25,000 to assist with the solicitation and reimburse brokers, nominees, custodians and other fiduciaries for their costs in sending proxy materials to beneficial owners.

Who solicits proxies?    Directors,proxies. Proxies may be solicited on our behalf by our directors, officers or other regular employees of ITT may solicit proxies from shareholders in person or by telephone, mail, electronic transmission and/or facsimile transmissiontransmission. Innisfree M&A Incorporated, 501 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10022, has been retained to assist in soliciting proxies for a fee of $12,500, plus distribution costs and other costs and expenses.

What is “householding” and how does it affect me?   The Company has adopted a procedure approved by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) called “householding.” Under this procedure, beneficial shareholders who have the same address and last name and who do not participate in electronic delivery or Internet access of proxy materials will receive only one copy of the Company’s Annual Report and Proxy Statement unless one or more of these shareholders notifies the Company that they wish to continue receiving individual copies. This procedure is designed to reduce duplicate mailings and save significant printing and processing costs, as well as natural resources. Each shareholder who participates in householding will continue to receive a separate proxy card or Notice. Your consent to householding is perpetual unless you revoke it. You may revoke your consent at any time by contacting Broadridge, either by calling toll-free at (800) 542-1061, or by writing to Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. Householding Department, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717. You will be removed from the householding program within 30 days of receipt of your response, after which you will receive an individual copy of the proxy materials.
Why did I receive a “Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials” but no proxy materials?   We distribute our proxy materials to certain shareholders by giving notice to those shareholders that they may access their proxy materials on the Internet. This so-called “Notice and Access” approach, which is permitted by SEC rules, conserves natural resources and reduces our costs of printing and distributing the proxy materials, while providing a convenient method of accessing the materials and voting to shareholders. On March 28, 2016, we mailed a “Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials” to participating shareholders, containing instructions on how to access the proxy materials on the Internet.
How do I receive proxy materials electronically in the future?    This Proxy Statement and the 2015 Annual Report are available online at www.proxyvote.com. Instead of receiving future proxy statements and accompanying materials by mail, most shareholders can elect to receive an e-mail that will provide electronic links to them. Opting to receive your proxy materials online will conserve natural resources and will save us the cost of producing documents and mailing them to you, and will also give you an electronic link to the proxy voting site.
Shareholders of Record.   You may sign up for the service by logging onto the Internet at www.proxyvote.com. Please have your proxy card handy when you go online.
Beneficial Owners.   You also may be able to receive copies of these documents electronically. Check the information provided in the proxy materials sent to you by your broker, bank or other holder of record regarding the availability of this service or contact them regarding electronic communication.delivery of materials.

How does a shareholder submitpropose matters for consideration at the 2017 annual meeting of shareholders?
Proposals to be included in our proxy statement.   Under SEC rules, if a shareholder wants us to include a proposal in our proxy statement for presentation at our 2017 annual meeting of shareholders, the 2014 Annual Meeting?proposal must be received by us by November 28, 2016. Any such proposal must comply with Rule 14a-8 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) establishes.
Proposals to be brought before the eligibility requirements and2017 annual meeting of shareholders. A shareholder seeking to introduce an item of business at the 2017 annual meeting of shareholders must comply with the procedures that must be followed for a shareholder proposalset forth in our By-laws. If you intend to propose an item of business to be includedpresented at our 2017 annual meeting of shareholders, you must notify us of your intention, in a public company’s proxy materials. Under the rule, if a shareholder wants to include a proposal in ITT’s proxy materials for its next Annual Meeting, the proposal must be received by ITT at its principal executive officeswriting, on or beforeafter November 27, 2013, and comply with eligibility requirements and procedures. An ITT shareholder who wants to present a matter for action at ITT’s next Annual Meeting,28, 2016, but chooses not to do so under Exchange Act Rule 14a-8, must deliver to ITT, at its principal executive offices, on or before November 27, 2013, a written notice to that effect; provided, however, inlater than December 28, 2016. In the event that the date of the 2014 Annual Meeting2017 annual meeting of shareholders is changed by more than 30 days from the anniversary date of the 2013 Annual Meeting, such notice must be received not laterearlier than 120 days calendar days prior to the 2014 Annual Meeting2017 annual meeting and not later than 90 calendar days prior to the 2017 annual meeting, or, if later, 10 calendar days following the date on which public announcement of the date of the 2017 annual meeting is first made. In either case, as well as for shareholder nominations for Directors,
For any special meeting of shareholders, the shareholder must also comply with the requirements in the Company’s By-laws with respect to a shareholder properly bringingitem of business before the Annual Meeting. (You can request a copy of the By-laws from the Secretary of ITT.)

Can a shareholder nominate Director Candidates?    The Company’s By-laws permit shareholders to nominate Directors and present other business for consideration at the Annual Meeting. To make a Director nomination or present other business for consideration at the 2014 Annual Meeting, you must submit a timely notice in accordance with the procedures described in the Company’s By-laws. To be timely, notice of Director nomination or any other business for consideration at the annual meeting must be received by our Secretary at our principal executive offices no lessearlier than 120 calendar days nor later than 90 days nor more than 120calendar days prior to the date we releasedof the special meeting, or, if later, 10 calendar days following the date on which the public announcement of the date of the special meeting is first made.



5



How does a shareholder nominate directors for the 2017 annual meeting of shareholders?
Director nominations for inclusion in our proxy statementstatement. In February 2016, we amended our By-laws to implement “proxy access,” which allows a shareholder or group of shareholders meeting certain conditions to nominate directors for election at annual meetings of shareholders using our proxy statement. This provision allows a shareholder, or group of up to 20 shareholders, to nominate up to two director candidates or, if greater, up to 20% of the number of directors then serving on our Board of Directors, if the shareholder or group has owned continuously for at least three years a number of shares equal to at least three percent of our outstanding common stock measured as of the date we receive the nomination. The number of director candidates who may be nominated under our proxy access By-law will be reduced by the number of director nominations made under our advance notice By-law, as described in connectionthe following section.
If you intend to nominate a director for election at the 2017 annual meeting of shareholders using our proxy access By-law, you must submit the nomination, along with last year’s annual meeting. Therefore,the other materials required by our By-laws, on or after October 29, 2016, but not later than November 28, 2016.
Director nominations to be presentedbrought before the 2017 annual meeting of shareholders. If you intend to nominate a director for consideration at the 2017 annual meeting of shareholders, you must notify us in writing of your intention to do so and provide us with the information required by our 2014 Annual Meeting, such a proposal must be receivedadvance notice By-law on or after November 27, 2013,28, 2016, but not later than December 27, 2013.28, 2016. In the event that the date of the 2017 annual meeting of shareholders is changed by more than 30 days from the anniversary date of the Annual Meeting, such notice must be received not earlier than 120 calendar days prior to the 2017 annual meeting and not later than 90 calendar days prior to the 2017 annual meeting, or, if later, 10 calendar days following the date on which public announcement of the date of the 2017 annual meeting is first made.
For any special meeting of shareholders, a nomination to be brought before the meeting must be received no earlier than 120 calendar days nor later than 90 calendar days prior to the date of the special meeting, or, if later, 10 calendar days following the date on which the public announcement of the date of the special meeting is first made.
Note that any such nominations will not be included in or voted through the Company’s proxy materials.
What information must I submit with a proposal or nomination? A shareholder’s submission of a proposal or director nomination must include information specified in our By-laws concerning the proposal or nomination, as the case may be, and information as to the shareholder’s ownership of common stock. Any person considering submission of a proposal for an item of business or a nomination to be considered at a shareholder meeting should carefully review our By-laws. We will not entertain any proposals or nominations at the 2017 annual meeting of shareholders that do not meet these requirements. The nominationBy-laws are available upon request, free of charge, from ITT Corporation, 1133 Westchester Avenue, White Plains, NY 10604, Attention: Corporate Secretary. The By-laws were also filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K that we filed with the SEC on February 22, 2016, which is available, free of charge, on the SEC’s website, www.sec.gov, and noticeour Investor Relations website, www.itt.com/investors.
Nominations of directors and notices relating thereto must meet all other qualifications and requirements of the Company’s Corporate Governance Principles, andthe committee charters (the “Corporate Governance Principles”), By-laws and Regulation 14A ofunder the Exchange Act. The nomineeAny shareholder nominees will be evaluated by the Nominating and Governance Committee of the Board using the same standards as it uses for all Directorother director nominees. These standards are discussed in further detail below under “Information about the Board of Directors-DirectorDirectors–Director Selection and Composition.” No one may be nominated
Where should I send a shareholder proposal or director nomination for election asthe 2017 annual meeting of shareholders?
If you intend to submit a Director after heproposal or she has reached 72 years of age. (You can request a copy ofdirector nomination, you must send the proposal or nomination, requirements from the Secretary of ITT.)

Householding of Proxy Materials

SEC rules permit companies and intermediaries such as brokersalong with all information required by our By-laws, to satisfy delivery requirements for proxy statements and notices with respect to two or more shareholders sharing the same address by delivering a single proxy statement or a single notice addressed to those shareholders. This process, which is commonly referred to as “householding,” provides cost savings for companies. Some brokers household proxy materials, delivering a single proxy statement or notice to multiple shareholders sharing an address unless contrary instructions have been received from the affected shareholders. Once you have received notice from your broker that they will be householding

materials to your address, householding will continue until you are notified otherwise or until you revoke your consent. If, at any time, you no longer wish to participate in householding and would prefer to receive a separate proxy statement or notice, please notify your broker. You can request prompt delivery of a copy of the Proxy Materials by writing to: Elizabeth O’Driscoll, Manager, Stock Administration,our principal executive offices at: ITT Corporation, 1133 Westchester Ave.,Avenue, White Plains, NY 10604, by email at Elizabeth.O’Driscoll@itt.comAttention: Corporate Secretary. We strongly encourage any shareholder interested in submitting a proposal or by calling (914) 641-2000.

We make available, freedirector nomination to contact our Corporate Secretary in advance of charge on our website, all of our filings that are made electronically with the SEC, including Forms 10-K, 10-Qabove deadlines to discuss the proposal, and 8-K. To access these filings, go to our website (www.itt.com) and click on “SEC Filings” under the “Investors” heading. Copies of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012, including financial statements and schedules thereto, filed with the SEC, are also available without charge to shareholders upon written request addressed to:

Corporate Secretary

ITT Corporation

1133 Westchester Ave.

White Plains, NY 10604

Internet Availability of Proxy Materials

In accordance with SEC rules, we are using the Internet as our primary means of furnishing proxy materials to shareholders. Because we are using the Internet, most shareholders will not receive paper copies of our proxy materials. We will instead send these shareholders a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials with instructions for accessing the proxy materials, including our proxy statement and annual report, and voting via the Internet. The Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials also provides information on how shareholders may obtain paper copieswant to consult knowledgeable counsel with regard to the detailed requirements of our proxy materials if they so choose.

Stock Ownership Information

The Board of Directors’ share ownership guidelines currently provide for share ownership levels at five times the annual cash retainer amount. Non-Management Directors receive a portion of their retainer in restricted stock units (“RSUs”), which are paid in shares when the RSUs vest. Non-Management Directors are encouraged to hold such shares until their total share ownership meets or exceeds the ownership guidelines.

Share ownership guidelines for corporate officers, first approved by ITT’s Board of Directors during 2001, are regularly reviewed. The guidelines specify the desired levels of Company stock ownershipapplicable securities laws and encourage a set of behaviors for each officer to reach the guideline levels. The guidelines require share ownership expressed as a multiple of base salary for all corporate officers.

Specifically, the guidelines apply as set forth in the table below under the heading “Share Ownership Guideline Summary.” In achieving these ownership levels, shares owned outright, Company restricted stock and RSUs, shares held in the Company’s dividend reinvestment plan, shares ownedBy-laws. Submitting a shareholder proposal or nomination does not guarantee that we will include it in the ITT Salaried Investment and Savings Plan, and “phantom” shares held in a fund that tracks an indexour Proxy Statement. The chairman of the Company’s stockAnnual Meeting may refuse to allow the transaction of any business, or to acknowledge the nomination of any person, not made in the deferred compensation plan are considered.

To attain the ownership levels set forth in the guidelines, it is expected that any restricted shares that become unrestricted and all shares acquired through the exercise of stock options will be held, except, in all cases, to the extent necessary to meet tax obligations.

Compliance with the guidelines is monitored periodically. Non-Management Directors and Company officers are afforded a reasonable period of time to meet the guidelines. The Company has taken the individual tenure and share ownership levels of Non-Management Directors and corporate officers into account in determining compliance with the guidelines.

foregoing procedures.

Share Ownership Guideline SummaryWho can help answer my additional questions?

Non-Management Directors5 X Annual Cash Retainer Amount
CEO5 X Annual Base Salary
CFO and EVP3 X Annual Base Salary
Senior Vice Presidents2 X Annual Base Salary
Vice Presidents1 X Annual Base Salary

    If you have any additional questions about the Annual Meeting or how to vote, please call our proxy solicitor, Innisfree M&A Incorporated, toll-free at 888-750-5834. Banks and brokers may call collect at 212-750-5833.



6



Stock Ownership of Directors, Executive Officers and Certain Shareholders

The following table shows the beneficial ownership of ITTour common stock, as of January 31, 2013,2016, by each Director and nominee,director, by each of the NEOs,named executive officers as defined by the SEC in Item 402 of Regulation S-K (“Named Executive Officers” or “NEOs”), and by all Directors, nominees,directors and executive officers as a group.

The number of shares beneficially owned by each Non-Management Directornon-management director or executive officer has been determined under the rules of the SEC, which provide that beneficial ownership includes any shares as to which a person has sole or shared voting or dispositive power, and any shares which the person would have the right to acquire beneficial ownership of within 60 days through the exercise of any stock option or other right. Unless otherwise indicated, each Non-Management Directornon-management director or executive officer has sole dispositive and voting power, or shares those powers with his or her spouse.

        Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership      
Name of Beneficial Owner  Title of Class  

Total

Shares

Beneficially

Owned

   

ITT Common  
Stock

Shares

Owned

   Options  

Stock

Units(1)

   

Percent

of Class

 

Denise L. Ramos

  Common Stock   396,651     50,922     345,729         *  

Aris C. Chicles

  Common Stock   108,719     16,253     92,466         *  

Thomas M. Scalera

  Common Stock   57,801     4,260     53,541         *  

Robert J. Pagano, Jr.

  Common Stock   172,436     31,563     140,873         *  

Luca Savi

  Common Stock                      *  

Thomas F. Korber

  Common Stock   7,205          7,205         *  

William E. Taylor

  Common Stock   108,373     11,501     96,872         *  

Orlando D. Ashford

  Common Stock   1,992     1,992              *  

G. Peter D’Aloia

  Common Stock   2,219              2,219     *  

Donald DeFosset, Jr.

  Common Stock   2,219              2,219     *  

Christina A. Gold

  Common Stock   24,497     14,743     4,260    5,494     *  

Paul J. Kern

  Common Stock   9,342     4,817     4,525         *  

Frank T. MacInnis

  Common Stock   19,260     12,369     4,260    2,631     *  

Linda S. Sanford

  Common Stock   25,985     17,823     7,485    677     *  

Donald J. Stebbins

  Common Stock   612     612              *  

Markos I. Tambakeras

  Common Stock   13,964     6,479     7,485         *  

Richard P. Lavin(2)

  Common Stock                      *  

All Directors and Executive Officers as a Group

  Common Stock   1,149,492     200,193     936,059    13,240     1.25

No directors or executive officers have pledged any shares of common stock.
Name of Beneficial OwnerAmount and Nature of Beneficial OwnershipPercent of Class
Total Shares Beneficially Owned
Shares Owned Directly(1)
Options(2)
Stock Units(3)
Denise L. Ramos828,464
78,090
633,632
116,742
*
Thomas M. Scalera161,400
17,582
118,347
25,471
*
Aris C. Chicles243,230
6,289
201,378
35,563
*
Luca Savi46,960
11,000
23,585
12,375
*
Victoria Creamer



*
Orlando D. Ashford11,218
11,218


*
G. Peter D’Aloia11,554
4,189

7,365
*
Geraud Darnis10,000
10,000


*
Donald DeFosset, Jr.11,616
9,397

2,219
*
Christina A. Gold33,736
21,096

12,640
*
Richard P. Lavin5,188
5,188


*
Frank T. MacInnis35,901
22,400
1,430
12,071
*
Rebecca A. McDonald2,933
2,933


*
Timothy H. Powers549
549


*
All Directors and Executive Officers as a Group (18 persons)1,448,330
200,037
996,331
251,962
1.6%
*Less than one percent1%

(1)Non-Management DirectorsIncludes units held as of January 31, 2016 representing interests in the ITT Stock Fund held within the ITT Retirement Savings Plan.
(2)Exercisable within 60 days of January 31, 2016.
(3)Reflects performance units and restricted stock units (“RSUs”) that vest or that may be settled within 60 days of January 31, 2016. The amounts for Ms. Ramos, Mr. Scalera, Mr. Chicles and Mr. Savi include RSUs and performance units that vested, and were settled in our common stock, in March 2016. Non-management directors’ total shares beneficially owned include restricted stock unitsRSUs that have vested but arefor which settlement is deferred until a later date.

(2)Nominee for election in May 2013.

Set forth below is

The principal occupation and certain other information about the nominees is set forth on the following pages.


7



The following table gives information about each person or group of persons who beneficially ownedwhom the Company knows to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of ITTthe outstanding shares of common stock as of March 22, 2013. Thisbased on information does not include holdingsfiled by that entity with the trustee with respect to individual participants inSEC on the ITT Salaried Investment and Savings Plan.

Name and address of

beneficial owner

  Amount and
nature of
beneficial
ownership
   Percent of
Class
 

Barrow, Hanley, Mewhinney & Strauss, LLC(1)

   6,269,460     6.76

2200 Ross Avenue, 31st Floor

Dallas, TX 75201-2761

    

BlackRock, Inc.(2)

   5,023,933     5.42

40 East 52nd Street

New York, NY 10022

    

The Vanguard Group(3)

   4,710,062     5.10

100 Vanguard Blvd.

Malvern, PA 19355

    

dates indicated below.
Name and address of beneficial ownerNumber of Shares Beneficially Owned
Percent of Class(5)
AllianceBernstein LP(1)
1345 Avenue of the Americas
New York, NY 10105
9,347,79410.4%
Capital Research Global Investors(2)
333 South Hope Street
Los Angeles, CA 90071
9,163,12110.2%
The Vanguard Group(3)
100 Vanguard Blvd
Malvern, PA 19355
6,487,9687.2%
BlackRock, Inc.(4)
40 East 52nd Street
New York, NY 10022
5,953,3606.7%
(1)As reported on Schedule 13G filed on FebruaryJanuary 11, 2013, Barrow, Hanley, Mewhinney & Strauss, LLC2016, AllianceBernstein LP has sole voting power with respect to 1,120,9598,400,761 shares, no shared voting power with respect to 5,148,501any shares, and sole dispositive power with respect to 6,269,4609,346,583 shares, and shared dispositive power with respect to 1,211 shares.

(2)As reported on Schedule 13G13G/A filed January 30, 2013, BlackRock, Inc.on February 16, 2016, Capital Research Global Investors has sole voting power with respect to 5,023,9339,163,121 shares, no shared voting power with respect to any shares, and sole dispositive power with respect to 5,023,9339,163,121 shares.

(3)As reported on Schedule 13G13G/A filed on February 13, 2013,10, 2016, The Vanguard Group has sole voting power with respect to 66,66164,364 shares, shared voting power with respect to 4,900 shares, sole dispositive power with respect to 6,424,104 shares, and shared dispositive power with respect to 63,864 shares.
(4)As reported on Schedule 13G/A filed on January 26, 2016, BlackRock, Inc. has sole voting power with respect to 5,632,346 shares, no shared voting power with respect to any shares, and sole dispositive power with respect to 4,648,001 shares, and shared dispositive power with respect to 62,0615,953,360 shares.

Equity Compensation Plan Information

The following sets forth information concerning the shares of common stock that may be issued under equity compensation plans as of December 31, 2012.

Plan Category

  Number of
Securities

to be Issued
Upon

Exercise of
Outstanding
Options,

Warrants
and Rights
  Weighted-
Average

Exercise
Price of

Outstanding
Options,

Warrants
and Rights
  Number of
Securities

Remaining
Available

for Future
Issuance

Under Equity
Compensation
Plans
 

Equity Compensation Plans Approved by Security Holders(1)(2)

   5,545,790(3)   18.46(4)   40,959,280(5) 

Equity Compensation Plans Not Approved by Security Holders

   —      —      —    

Total

   5,545,790    18.46    40,959,280  

(1)Equity compensation plans approved by shareholders include the 1994 ITT Incentive Stock Plan, the 1996 Plan, the 2002 ITT Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors, the ITT Amended and Restated 2003 Equity Incentive Plan and the 2011 Omnibus Incentive Plan.

(2)(5)

Since the approval of the 2011 Omnibus Incentive Plan, no additional awards, including awards of restricted stock, will be granted under the other plans referred to in footnote (1) above. Under

the 2011 Omnibus Incentive Plan currently in effect, restricted stock and restricted stock units may be awarded up to a maximum aggregate grant of 1,875,441 shares or units in any one plan year to any one participants.

(3)The weighted-average remaining contractual life of the total number of outstanding options was 4.2 years as disclosed in Note 17 to the Consolidated Financial Statements inCalculations based on the Company’s 2012 Annual Report on Form 10-K.shares outstanding as of January 31, 2016.

(4)The weighted-average exercise price pertains only to 4,348,874 outstanding options and not to outstanding restricted stock shares or units, which by their nature have no exercise price.

(5)As of December 31, 2012, the number of shares available for future issuance under the 2011 Omnibus Incentive Plan with respect to restricted stock and restricted stock unit awards was approximately 18,073,922, which is included in the 40,959,280 disclosed above.

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

The members of the Board of Directors, the executive officers and persons who hold more than 10% of the outstanding common stock are subject to the reporting requirements of Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act, which requires them to file reports with respect to their ownership of, and transactions in, our common stock. Based on our records and other information, we believe that the Company’sin 2015 our directors and our executive officers and any persons beneficially owning more than 10% of a registered class of the Company’s equity securities, file reports of ownership and changes in ownership with the SEC within specified time periods. To the Company’s knowledge, based upon a review of the copies of the reports furnishedwho are subject to the Company and written representations that no other reports were required,Section 16(a) met all applicable filing requirements were satisfied in a timely manner for the year ended December 31, 2012.

requirements.



8



Proposals to be Voted on at the 2013 Annual Meeting

Item 1.    Electionof Directors

The

Item 1.     Election of Directors
All 10 members of our Board are standing for re-election, to hold office until the 2017 annual meeting of Directors has nominated eight individualsshareholders. Each director must be elected by a majority of the votes cast by the shareholders represented in person or by proxy at the Annual Meeting. A “majority of the votes cast” means that the number of votes cast “for” a director must exceed the number of votes cast “against” that director (with abstentions and broker non-votes not counted as votes cast with respect to that director). In a contested election for director (an election in which the number of nominees for election as Directorsdirector is greater than the number of directors to be elected), the vote standard would be a plurality of votes cast.
In accordance with our Corporate Governance Principles, the Board will nominate for election or re-election as a director only candidates who agree to tender, promptly following their failure to receive the required vote for election or re-election in an uncontested election at a meeting in which they would face election or re-election, an irrevocable resignation that will be effective upon acceptance by the Board. In addition, the Board will fill director vacancies and new directorships only with candidates who agree to tender the same form of resignation promptly following their appointment to the Board.
If an incumbent director fails to receive the required vote for re-election in an uncontested election and submits his or her conditional resignation to the Chairman of the Board or the Corporate Secretary, then the Nominating and Governance Committee (or the equivalent committee then in existence) shall promptly consider the resignation and all relevant facts and circumstances concerning any vote and the best interests of the Company and its shareholders. The Board will act on the Committee’s recommendation no later than its next regularly scheduled Board meeting (after certification of the shareholder vote) or within 90 days after certification of the shareholder vote, whichever is earlier, and the Board will promptly publicly disclose its decision and the reasons for its decision.
Each nominee elected as a director will continue in office until the earlier of the 2017 annual meeting of shareholders, his or her successor having been duly elected and qualified, or his or her death, resignation or removal.
The 10 nominees for election to the Board in 2016 have agreed to serve if elected, and management has no reason to believe that such nominees will be unavailable to serve. In the event that any of the nominees is unable or declines to serve as a director at the 2013 Annual Meeting. If unforeseen circumstances arise beforetime of the 2013 Annual Meeting, andthen the persons named as proxies may vote for a substitute nominee becomes unablechosen by the present Board to serve,fill the vacancy. Alternatively, the Board of Directors couldmay reduce the size of the Board or nominate another candidate for election. Ifof Directors. The individuals named as proxies in the Board nominates another candidate, the proxies could use their discretionproxy card intend to vote for that nominee. Each Director elected at the 2013 Annual Meeting will be elected to serve asproxy (if you are a Director until ITT’s next Annual Meeting.

The Boardshareholder of Directors recommends that you voterecord) FOR the election of each of these nominees, unless you indicate otherwise on the proxy card.

The principal occupation and certain other information about the nominees is set forth on the following eight nominees:

pages.
LOGO
Orlando D. Ashford, 47, has served as the President of Holland America Line, a division of Carnival Corporation, since December 2014. Previously, Mr. Ashford was the President of the Talent business segment at Mercer, a global consulting leader and subsidiary of Marsh & McLennan Companies (“Marsh”). From 2008 to 2012, Mr. Ashford was the Senior Vice President, Chief Human Resources and Communications Officer for Marsh. Prior to joining Marsh in 2008, Mr. Ashford served as Group Director of Human Resources for Eurasia and Africa for the Coca-Cola Company and as Vice President of Global Human Resources Strategy and Organizational Development for Motorola, Inc. He has also held leadership positions with Mercer Delta Consulting, Ameritech and Andersen Consulting. Mr. Ashford is also Vice Chair of the board of directors for the Executive Leadership Council. He also serves on advisory boards for Purdue University School of Technology and the NFL Players Association.

Mr. Ashford has served as a director of the Company since December 2011, and is currently a member of the Compensation and Personnel Committee and the Nominating and Governance Committee. In considering Mr. Ashford for director of the Company, the Board considered his expertise in addressing talent, culture and human capital issues at the executive level, as well as his significant experience in multinational organizations, providing experience and skills relevant to the Company’s international sales operations.



9



Denise L. RamosG. Peter D’Aloia

, 71, served as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Trane, Inc. (formerly American Standard Companies Inc.) from 2000 until his retirement in 2008. Prior to that, Mr. D’Aloia was employed by AlliedSignal Inc. (now known as Honeywell), a diversified industrial company, most recently serving as Vice President, Strategic Planning and Business Development. He spent 28 years with AlliedSignal in diverse finance management positions, including as Vice President, Taxes; Vice President and Treasurer; Vice President and Controller; and Vice President and Chief Financial Officer for the Engineered Materials Sector. Early in his career, he worked as a tax attorney for the accounting firm Arthur Young and Company. Mr. D’Aloia is currently a director of the following public companies: FMC Corporation since 2002 (Lead Director; Audit Committee; Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee; Executive Committee); and WABCO Holdings Inc. since 2007 (Audit Committee). Mr. D’Aloia is also a director of various private companies. He also served on the board of the following public company within the last five years: AirTran Airways, Inc. from 2004 to 2011.


Mr. D’Aloia has served as a director of the Company since October 2011, and is currently Chairman of the Audit Committee. In considering Mr. D’Aloia for director of the Company, the Board considered his significant financial and business experience resulting from senior executive and financial roles in large manufacturing operations at public companies, his strong international experience, his service as a director of several other public companies and his overall financial management abilities, including multinational legal, tax and banking expertise.
Geraud Darnis, 56, served as the President & Chief Executive Officer of UTC Building & Industrial Systems, the world’s largest provider of high-technology building systems, whose brands include Otis, Carrier, Chubb, Kidde and Automated Logic from September 2013 to December 2015. UTC Building & Industrial Systems is a unit of United Technologies Corporation (“UTC”). Mr. Darnis served as the President and Chief Executive Officer of UTC Climate, Controls and Security from September 2011 to September 2013. In 2001, he served briefly as President of UTC Power before being named President of Carrier, a position he held until 2011 when Carrier and UTC Fire & Security were combined into UTC Climate, Controls & Security. Prior to 2001, Mr. Darnis held a number of general management and financial positions at UTC in Latin America, Europe and Asia. Mr. Darnis also served as a member on the Air-Conditioning Heating and Refrigeration Institute from 2003 to 2006, including Chairman from November 2004 to November 2005, and then as an advisory member of the Executive Committee from 2007 to 2014.

Mr. Darnis has served as a director of the Company since October 2015 and is currently a member of the Audit Committee. In considering Mr. Darnis for director of the Company, the Board considered his significant management experience as president of a major operating unit at a large manufacturing company and his wide-ranging expertise in a variety of industries in which the Company operates, including industrial and aerospace.
Donald DeFosset, Jr., 67, retired in 2005 as Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Walter Industries, Inc., a diversified public company with principal operating businesses in homebuilding and home financing, water transmission products and energy services. Mr. DeFosset had served since November 2000 as President and Chief Executive Officer, and since March 2002 as Chairman, of Walter Industries. Over his career, Mr. DeFosset held significant leadership positions in major multinational corporations, including Dura Automotive Systems, Inc., a global supplier of engineered systems, Navistar International Corporation and AlliedSignal, Inc. Mr. DeFosset is currently a director of the following public companies: National Retail Properties Inc. since 2008 (Chairman of Governance and Nominating Committee; Compensation Committee); Regions Financial Corporation since 2005 (Chairman of Compensation Committee; Risk Committee); and Terex Corporation since 1999 (Chairman of Nominating and Governance Committee; Audit Committee). Mr. DeFosset is also a director of various private companies and not-for-profit organizations. He also served on the board of the following public company within the last five years: EnPro Industries, Inc. from 2010 to 2011.

Mr. DeFosset has served as a director of the Company since October 2011, and is currently a member of the Compensation and Personnel Committee and the Nominating and Governance Committee. In considering Mr. DeFosset for director of the Company, the Board considered his extensive experience as a chief executive of a large diversified industrial company and as a senior executive of an international machinery manufacturer. His service on the boards of directors of a variety of large public companies further enhances his experience and adds value to the Company’s Board.



10




Christina A. Gold, 68, was President and Chief Executive Officer of The Western Union Company, a leading company in global money transfer, from September 2006 to September 2010. She was President of Western Union Financial Services, Inc. and Senior Executive Vice President of First Data Corporation, former parent company of The Western Union Company, from May 2002 to September 2006. Prior to that, Ms. Gold served as Vice Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Excel Communications, Inc., from October 1999 to May 2002. From 1998 to 1999, Ms. Gold served as President and CEO of Beaconsfield Group, Inc., a direct selling advisory firm that she founded. Ms. Gold began her career in 1970 at Avon Products, Inc., where she spent 28 years in a variety of significant leadership positions. She currently serves on the board of Carleton University. Ms. Gold is currently a director of the following public companies: International Flavors & Fragrances, Inc. since 2013 (Compensation Committee; Governance Committee) and Korn/Ferry International since 2014 (Compensation and Personnel Committee; Governance Committee). Ms. Gold has also served as a director since 2001 of New York Life Insurance Company and currently serves on the board of the Safe Water Network. She has also served on the board of the following public company within the last five years: Exelis Inc. from 2011 to 2013.

Ms. Gold has served as a director of the Company since December 1997, and is currently Chairwoman of the Compensation and Personnel Committee and a member of the Audit Committee. In considering Ms. Gold for director of the Company, the Board considered her extensive experience as the Chief Executive Officer of a public company with wide ranging global leadership, management and marketing experience. The Board also considered her long history as a director of the Company and extensive knowledge of the Company, its operations and its people.

Richard P. Lavin, 64, was Chief Executive Officer and President

ITT of Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc., a leader in the development, manufacturing and fulfillment of fully integrated system solutions for the commercial vehicle market from May 2013 to November 2015. Prior to joining Commercial Vehicle Group, Mr. Lavin spent 29 years in a variety of positions with Caterpillar Inc., including as Vice President of manufacturing operations for the Asia Pacific Division, serving as Chairman of Shin Caterpillar Mitsubishi Ltd. (SCM)-now Caterpillar Japan Ltd. (CJL)-and Chairman of Caterpillar (China) Investment Co., Ltd, and as a group president for Construction Industries and Growth Markets. Mr. Lavin is currently a director of the following public companies: USG Corporation

since 2009 (Chairman of Compensation Committee; Finance Committee) and Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc. since 2016. He has also served on the board of the following public company within the last five years: Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. from 2013 to 2015.

Mr. Lavin has served as a director of the Company since May 2013, and is currently a member of the Compensation and Personnel Committee and the Nominating and Governance Committee. In considering Mr. Lavin for director of the Company, the Board considered his experience overseeing Caterpillar Inc.’s largest operating division and extensive international experience through overseeing that company’s operations in China, India, Japan and the Asia-Pacific region. In addition, Mr. Lavin has a diverse legal and human resources background, having served as director of Corporate Labor and Human Relations and director of Compensation and Benefits, as well as the Vice President of Caterpillar’s Human Services Division.

Director Biographical Information:Ms. Ramos, 56, was appointed Chief Executive Officer and President and elected a Director of ITT on October 31, 2011. She previously served as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of ITT. Ms. Ramos has greater than 20 years of business and financial experience acquired at Atlantic Richfield Company (ARCO). During her tenure at ARCO, she served in a number of increasingly responsible finance positions, including Corporate General Auditor and Assistant Treasurer. In addition, Ms. Ramos has five years of experience at Yum! Brands, Inc., where she was Senior Vice President and Corporate Treasurer for Yum! and Chief Financial Officer for the U.S. division of KFC Corporation. Prior to joining ITT in 2007, Ms. Ramos served as Chief Financial Officer for Furniture Brands International. Ms. Ramos holds a Master of Business Administration in Finance from the University of Chicago and attended Purdue University’s economic honors program.

Director Experience, Qualifications, Attributes or Skills Relevant to Board Membership:

Ms. Ramos’s unique background combines more than two decades in the oil and gas industry with significant retail and customer-centric experience. She has extensive operational and manufacturing experience with industrial companies and, in particular, she has intimate knowledge of the Company’s business and operations having served as our Chief Financial Officer since 2007. Ms. Ramos is on the Board of Trustees for the Manufacturers Alliance for Productivity and Innovation and was recently included in the Top 100 Women Leaders in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math publication by STEMconnector.

Directorships at Public Companies for the Preceding Five Years:Ms. Ramos has been a Director of ITT since October 31, 2011.




11



LOGO

Frank T. MacInnis

Chairman and former, 69, was Chief Executive Officer of EMCOR Group, Inc., one of the world’s largest providers of electrical and mechanical construction services, energy infrastructure and facilities services,

from 1994 to 2011 and Chairman of the Board from 1994 to 2013. Throughout his career Mr. MacInnis has managed construction and operations all over the world, including in Tehran, Baghdad, Bangkok, the United Arab Emirates, London, the United States and Canada. Mr. MacInnis is also a director of various private companies and not-for-profit organizations. In addition, he also served on the board of the following public companies within the past five years: EMCOR Group, Inc. from 1994 to 2015; and The Williams Companies, Inc. from 1998 to 2015.

Mr. MacInnis has served as a director of the Company since October 2001 and as Chairman of the Board since October 2011, and he is currently Chairman of the Nominating and Governance Committee. In considering Mr. MacInnis for director of the Company, the Board considered his more than 25 years of broad-based experience as a chief executive officer of a leading, publicly held, international mechanical and electrical construction, energy infrastructure and facilities services provider. The Board also considered his experiences on the boards of various other public companies, his leadership and insights in many of the commercial and defense markets served by the Company, as well as his background in corporate governance, finance and accounting, legal, strategy and risk management.

Director Biographical Information:Mr. MacInnis, 66, is currently Chairman of the Board and was Chief Executive Officer of EMCOR Group, Inc. from April 1994 to January 2011. He was also

President of EMCOR from April 1994 to April 1997. Mr. MacInnis is Chairman of the Board and a director of ComNet Communications, LLC and The Williams Companies, Inc. He also serves on the Board of Directors of Gilbane, Inc. Mr. MacInnis received an undergraduate degree from The University of Alberta and is a graduate of The University of Alberta Law School, Alberta, Canada.

Director Experience, Qualifications, Attributes or Skills Relevant to Board Membership:

Mr. MacInnis has greater than 25 years of broad-based experience as a Chief Executive Officer of a leading, publicly held, international mechanical and electrical construction, energy infrastructure, and facilities services provider. Mr. MacInnis provides knowledgeable leadership and insight into the many commercial and defense markets served by the Company and has a strong corporate and finance background.

Directorships at Public Companies for the Preceding Five Years:Mr. MacInnis has been a Director of ITT since 2001. He was elected Chairman of the Board of ITT on October 31, 2011. Mr. MacInnis has been Chairman of the Board and a director of EMCOR Group, Inc. since 1994 and a Director of The Williams Companies, Inc. since 1998. He was elected Chairman of the Board of The Williams Companies, Inc. in May 2011. In December 2011, Mr. MacInnis joined the Board of Directors of Gilbane, Inc., a real estate development and construction company.



LOGO

Orlando D. AshfordRebecca A. McDonald

, 63, retired in July 2012, having served since December 2008 as Chief Executive Officer of Laurus Energy Inc., a company involved in underground coal gasification development. She previously served as President, Talent Business Segment

Mercer

Gas and Power, BHP Billiton from March 2004 to September 2007, and, from October 2001 to January 2004, she served as President of the Houston Museum of Natural Science. Ms. McDonald has more than 25 years of experience in the energy industry. She has been responsible for the development, construction and operation of natural gas and liquids pipelines, gas and electricity distribution companies, as well as power plant and gas processing facilities in North America, Asia, Africa and South America. Ms. McDonald is currently a director of the following public company: CHR public limited company since 2015 (Acquisition Committee; Finance Committee). Ms. McDonald is also currently a director of Veresen Inc. since 2008. In addition, she also served on the boards of the following public companies within the last five years: Aggreko plc from 2001 to 2015 and Granite Construction Incorporated from 1994 to 2015.

Ms. McDonald has served as a director of the Company since December 2013, and is currently a member of the Compensation and Personnel Committee and the Audit Committee. In considering Ms. McDonald for director of the Company, the Board considered her significant expertise in the oil and gas industry, as well as her executive-level experience and extensive knowledge of business systems and operations. The Board also considered her experience as a director of a variety of public and private companies within the energy industry.

Director Biographical Information:Mr. Ashford, 44, is the President of the Talent business segment at Mercer. Previously, Mr. Ashford was the Senior Vice President, Chief Human Resources and Communications Officer for Marsh & McLennan Companies. In 2008, Mr. Ashford served as Group Director of Human Resources for Eurasia and Africa for the Coca-Cola Company and Vice President of Global Human Resources Strategy and Organizational Development for Motorola Inc. He has also held leadership positions with Mercer Delta Consulting, Ameritech and Andersen Consulting. Mr. Ashford holds a Bachelor of Science in Organizational Leadership and a Master of Science in Industrial Technology, both from Purdue University.

Director Experience, Qualifications, Attributes or Skills Relevant to Board Membership:

Mr. Ashford has significant experience in multinational organizations, providing experience and skills relevant to the Company’s international sales infrastructure. In 2010 and 2012, Mr. Ashford was named by Savoy magazine as one of the “100 Most Influential Blacks in Corporate America.” In 2011 and 2012, Uptown Professional named him one of the top 100 executives in corporate America. Mr. Ashford is also on the Board of Directors for the Executive Leadership Council and for ROADS Charter High School. He also serves on advisory boards for Purdue University School of Technology and the NFL Players Association. Mr. Ashford also currently serves on the Board of Directors of Streetwise Partners.

Directorships at Public Companies for the Preceding Five Years:Mr. Ashford has served as a Director of ITT since December 12, 2011.


LOGO

Peter D’AloiaTimothy H. Powers

Former, 67, was the Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Hubbell Incorporated (“Hubbell”) from 2004 to 2013. He was appointed to the position of Chairman after having served as the President and Chief Executive Officer of Hubbell from 2001 to 2004 and as the Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer American Standard Companies,from 1998 to 2001. Mr. Powers also served as Executive Vice President, Finance and Business Development Americas Region at ABB, Inc.

and as Vice President and Corporate Controller for BBC Brown Boveri, Inc. Mr. Powers is currently a director of the following public company: WestRock Company (formerly MeadWestvaco Corporation ), since 2006 (Audit Committee; Compensation Committee). In addition, Mr. Powers served as a director of the National Electric Manufacturers Association and as a trustee for Manufacturers Alliance for Productivity and Innovation until 2013. He also served on the board of the following public company within the last five years: Hubbell Incorporated from 2004 to 2014.

Mr. Powers has served as a director of the Company since February 2015 and is currently a member of the Audit Committee and the Nominating and Governance Committee. In considering Mr. Powers for director of the Company, the Board considered his significant experience as a Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and in the areas of management, strategic planning, and mergers and acquisitions in the manufacturing industry.

Director Biographical Information:Mr. D’Aloia, 68, served as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of American Standard Companies Inc., a position he held since 2000, before retiring in 2008. Before joining American Standard, Mr. D’Aloia worked for Honeywell where he most recently served as Vice President—Business Development. He spent 27 years with Honeywell’s predecessor company, AlliedSignal, in diverse finance management positions. During his career with AlliedSignal, he served as Vice President—Taxes; Vice President and Treasurer; Vice President and Controller; and Vice President and Chief Financial Officer for the Engineered Materials Sector. Early in his career, he worked as a tax attorney for the accounting firm Arthur Young and Company.

Director Experience, Qualifications, Attributes or Skills Relevant to Board Membership:

Mr. D’Aloia holds a law degree from St. John’s University, a Master of Laws (LLM) in taxation from New York University Law School and a Bachelor of Science degree in accounting from New York University. Mr. D’Aloia has significant executive management experience gained as an executive officer, strong international experience and financial expertise. Mr. D’Aloia has also served as a director of other public companies, providing additional relevant experience.

Directorships at Public Companies for the Preceding Five Years:Mr. D’Aloia has served as a Director of ITT since October 31, 2011. Mr. D’Aloia is also a board member and managing director of Ascend Performance Materials, Inc. In addition, he currently serves on the boards of FMC Corporation and WABCO Holdings, Inc. and he formerly served on the Board of AirTran Airways, Inc.




12



LOGO

Donald DeFosset, Jr.Denise L. Ramos

Former Chairman, James Hardie Industries N.V.

Director Biographical Information:Donald DeFosset, Jr., 64, retired in 2005 as Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Walter Industries, Inc., a diversified company with principal operating businesses in homebuilding and home financing, water transmission products and energy services. Mr. DeFosset served since November 2000 as President and Chief Executive Officer, and since March 2002 as Chairman, of Walter Industries. Previously, he was Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of Dura Automotive Systems, Inc. (“Dura”), a global supplier of engineered systems, from October 1999 through June 2000. Before joining Dura, Mr. DeFosset served as a Corporate Executive Vice President, President of the Truck Group and a member of the Office of Chief Executive Officer of Navistar International Corporation from October 1996 to August 1999.

Director Experience, Qualifications, Attributes or Skills Relevant to Board Membership:

Mr. DeFosset holds a Master of Business Administration from Harvard Business School and a Bachelor of Science degree in industrial engineering from Purdue University. Mr. DeFosset has significant experience as a chief executive of a large diversified industrial company and as a senior executive of an international machinery manufacturer. Mr. DeFosset has also served as a director of other public companies, providing additional relevant experience.

Directorships at Public Companies for the Preceding Five Years:Mr. DeFosset has served as a director of ITT since October 31, 2011. Mr. DeFosset also serves as a Director of National Retail Properties Inc., Regions Financial Corporation and Terex Corporation, Inc. Previously, Mr. DeFosset served as a Director of EnPro Industries, Inc. from 2008-2011 and of James Hardie Industries N.V. from 2006 through 2008.

LOGO

Christina A. Gold

Former President,, 59, was appointed Chief Executive Officer, President and Director, The Western Uniona director of the Company Inc.

Director Biographical Information:Mrs. Gold, 65, was President and Chief Executive Officer of The Western Union Company, a leading company in global money transfer, from September 2006 to September 2010. From May 2002 to September 2006, Mrs. Gold was President of Western Union Financial Services, Inc. andin October 2011. She previously served as Senior Executive Vice President of Western Union’s parent company, First Data Corporation. From October 1999 to May 2002, she was Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Excel Communications, Inc. Mrs. Gold served as President and Chief Executive Officer of The Beaconsfield Group from March 1998 to October 1999. From 1997 to 1998, Mrs. Gold was Executive Vice President of Global Development of Avon Products, Inc., and from 1993 to 1997, she was President of Avon North America. Mrs. Gold is a graduate of Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada. She is a board member of the Safe Water Network.

Director Experience, Qualifications, Attributes or Skills Relevant to Board Membership:

Mrs. Gold has extensive experience as the Chief Executive Officer of a public company with wide ranging global leadership, management and marketing experience. She was recognized in 2003, 2006, 2008 and 2009 byFortunemagazine as one of America’s 50 Most Powerful Women in Business and byForbesmagazine on its “100 Most Powerful Women” list in 2007, 2008, and 2009.BusinessWeekalso named her as one of the top 25 U.S. managers in 1996. She served as Director of The Western Union Company from October 2006 to September 2010.

Directorships at Public Companies for the Preceding Five Years:Mrs. Gold has served as a Director of ITT since 1997 and as a Director of New York Life Insurance Company, a mutual company, since 2001. Mrs. Gold previously served as a Director of Torstar Corporation, a broad-based Canadian media company. She served as a Director of The Western Union Company from October 2006 to September 2010. Mrs. Gold was elected a Director of Exelis Inc. on October 31, 2011; as part of the transaction process for the separation of the Xylem Inc. and Exelis Inc. businesses from ITT, Mrs. Gold has agreed to resign as a director of Exelis Inc. with effect from the date of the election of her replacement at Exelis Inc.’s annual shareholders meeting.

LOGO

Richard P. Lavin

Former Group President Caterpillar,and Chief Financial Officer of the Company since 2007. Prior to joining the Company, Ms. Ramos served as Chief Financial Officer for Furniture Brands International from 2005 to 2007. From 2000 to 2005, Ms. Ramos served as Senior Vice President and Corporate Treasurer at Yum! Brands, Inc. and Chief Financial Officer for the U.S. division of KFC Corporation. Ms. Ramos began her career in 1979 at Atlantic Richfield Company (ARCO), where she had more than 20 years of business and financial experience serving in a number of increasingly responsible finance positions, including Corporate General Auditor and Assistant Treasurer. Ms. Ramos is currently a director of the following public company: Praxair, Inc., a leading manufacturersince 2014 (Audit Committee; Governance and Nominating Committee). She serves on the Executive Committee of constructionthe Board of Trustees for the Manufacturers Alliance for Productivity and mining equipment, dieselInnovation and natural gas engines; industrial gas turbines; and diesel-electric locomotives.

Director Biographical Information:Mr. Lavin, 61, was a group president of Caterpillar, Inc. for Construction Industries and Growth Markets. In November 2009, Mr. Lavin was appointed to the Board of Directors of USG Corporation, a leading building products company. He is also a member of the Business Roundtable and the Business Council. Ms. Ramos was included in the Top 100 CEO Leaders in Science, Technology, Engineering and Math publication by STEMconnector, she recently received a Distinguished Leadership Award from the New York Hall of Science and she was named to Fortune magazine’s 2014 Top People in Business.


In considering Ms. Ramos for director of the Company, the Board considered Ms. Ramos’ unique background which combines more than two decades in the oil and gas industry with significant retail and customer-centric experience. The Board also considered her extensive operational and manufacturing experience with industrial companies and, in particular, her intimate knowledge of the Company’s business and operations having served as its Chief Financial Officer since 2007 and Chief Executive Officer since 2011.
Recommendation of the Board of Directors of the U.S. China Business Council, U.S. India Business Council and the U.S. Korea Business Council. He is a member of
The Conference Board and the Chicago Council of

Global Affairs. He serves on the International Advisory Council of Guanghua School of Management at Peking University and is on the Board of Trustees at Bradley University. Mr. Lavin has a bachelor’s degree from Western Illinois University and law degrees from both Creighton University and Georgetown University.

Director Experience, Qualifications, Attributes or Skills Relevant to Board Membership:

Mr. Lavin has extensive experience in Asian and Latin American operations and was a product manager in Track-Type Tractors. Before becoming a group president, he was most recently Vice President of manufacturing operations for the Asia Pacific Division, serving as chairman of Shin Caterpillar Mitsubishi Ltd. (SCM) – now Caterpillar Japan Ltd. (CJL) – and chairman of Caterpillar (China) Investment Co., Ltd. Mr. Lavin had administrative responsibility for manufacturing operations in the region, including facilities in China, India and Indonesia. Mr. Lavin was director of Corporate Labor and Human Relations and director of Compensation and Benefits, as well as the vice president of Caterpillar’s Human Services Division. He is also a director of USG Corporation, providing additional relevant experience.

Directorships at Public Companies for the Preceding Five Years:

Mr. Lavin has served on the Board of Directors unanimously recommends a vote FOR the election of USG Corporation from November 2009 to the present.

LOGO

Donald J. Stebbins

Former Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President, Visteon Corporation, a leading global supplier of innovative climate, interior, electronic and lighting products for vehicle manufacturers

Director Biographical Information:Mr. Stebbins, 55, served10 nominees listed above as directors. Unless a contrary choice is specified, proxies solicited by our Board will be voted FOR the Chairmanelection of Visteon Corporation from December 2008 through August 2012 andthe 10 nominees listed above as the Chief Executive Officer from June 2008 through August 2012. Mr. Stebbins joined Visteon in June 2005 as the President and Chief Operating Officer. Prior to joining Visteon, he was President and Chief Operating Officer of Lear Corporation’s operations in Europe, Asia and Africa. Before that, he was President and Chief Operating Officer of Lear Corporation’s operations in the Americas. Before joining Lear in 1992, Mr. Stebbins held positions at Bankers Trust Co. and Citibank.

Director Experience, Qualifications, Attributes or Skills Relevant to Board Membership:

Mr. Stebbins has more than 20 years of leadership experience in global operations and finance, including 13 years in senior leadership positions with Lear before joining Visteon.

Directorships at Public Companies for the Preceding Five Years:Mr. Stebbins has served as a Director of ITT since March 1, 2012. He also currently serves on the board of WABCO Holdings, Inc. and he served on Visteon’s Board of Directors from December 2006 until August 2012.

directors.

Item 2.    Ratification of Appointment of the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Audit Committee is directly responsible for the appointment, compensation, retention and oversight of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm. To execute this responsibility, the Audit Committee engages in a comprehensive annual evaluation of the independent registered public accounting firm’s qualifications, performance and independence and whether the independent registered public accounting firm should be rotated, and considers the advisability and potential impact of selecting a different independent registered public accounting firm.
The Audit Committee has selected, and the Board of Directors has appointedratified the selection of, Deloitte to serve as ITT’sour independent registered public accounting firm for 2013. Shareholder ratification2016. Deloitte has served as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm since 2002. In accordance with SEC rules and Deloitte policies, audit partners are subject to rotation requirements to limit the number of consecutive years an individual partner may provide service to our Company. For lead and concurring audit partners, the maximum number of consecutive years of service in that capacity is not requiredfive years. The process for making such appointment forselection of the fiscal year ending December 31, 2013, becauseCompany’s lead audit partner pursuant to this rotation policy involves a meeting between the Chair of the Audit Committee has responsibilityand the candidate for the appointmentrole, as well as discussion by the full committee and with management.
The Audit Committee and Board of Directors believe that the continued retention of Deloitte as our independent registered public accounting firm. The appointmentfirm is being submittedin the best interest of the Company and our shareholders, and we are asking our shareholders to ratify the selection of Deloitte as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2016. Although ratification is not required by our By-laws or otherwise, the Board is submitting the selection of Deloitte to our shareholders for ratification withbecause we value our shareholders’ views on the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm and as a view toward solicitingmatter of good corporate practice. In the opinion ofevent that our shareholders which opinionfail to ratify the selection, it will be taken into consideration in future deliberations. No determination has been made asconsidered a recommendation to what action the Board of Directors orand the Audit Committee would taketo consider the selection of a different firm. In addition, even if shareholders do not ratify the appointment. selection of Deloitte, the Audit Committee may in its discretion select a different independent registered public accounting firm at any time during the year if it determines that such a change would be in the best interests of the Company and our shareholders.


13



Deloitte is a registered public accounting firm regulated by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”). Representatives of Deloitte attended all regularly scheduled meetings

of the Audit Committee during 2012.2015. The Audit Committee discussed with the independent registered public accounting firm all communications required by auditing standards of the PCAOB. In addition, the committee discussed with the registered public accounting firm its independence from the Company and its management. The Audit Committee annually reviews and considers Deloitte’s performance of the Company’s audit. Performance factors reviewed include Deloitte’s:

Ÿ
independence 

Independence

leadership

Ÿexperience 

Experience

non-audit services

Ÿtechnical capabilities 

Technical capabilities

management structure

Ÿclient service assessment 

Client service assessment

peer review program

Ÿresponsiveness 

Responsiveness

commitment to quality report

Ÿfinancial strength 

Financial strength

appropriateness of fees charged

Ÿindustry insight 

Industry insight

Ÿ

Leadership

Ÿ

Non-audit services

Ÿ

Management structure

Ÿ

Peer review program

Ÿ

Commitment to quality report

Ÿ

Appropriateness of fees charged

Ÿ

Compliancecompliance and ethics programs

program

The Audit Committee also reviewed the terms and conditions of Deloitte’s engagement letter including an agreement between the Company and Deloitte to submit disputes between Deloitte and the Company to a dispute resolution process.

The Audit Committee discussed these considerationsthe engagement letter, as well as Deloitte’s fees and services with Deloitte and Company management. The Audit Committee also determined that any non-audit services (services other than those described in the annual audit services engagement letter) provided by Deloitte were permitted under the rules and regulations concerning auditor independence promulgated by the SEC and rules promulgated by the PCAOB in Rule 3526.PCAOB. Representatives of Deloitte will be present at the 2013 Annual Meeting to answer questions. Representatives of Deloitte also will have the opportunity to make a statement if they desire to do so.

Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Fees

Aggregate fees billed to the Company for the fiscal years ended December 31, 20122015 and 20112014 represent fees billed by the member firms of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu, and their respectiveits foreign affiliates.

   Fiscal Year Ended 
   2012(1)   2011 
   (In thousands) 

Audit Fees(2)

  $3,995    $4,347  

Audit-Related Fees(3)

   571     14,714  

Tax Fees(4)

    

Tax Compliance Services

   464     2,470  

Tax Planning Services

   169     4,888  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total Tax Services

   633     7,358  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

All Other Fees(5)

   0     11,508  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  $  5,199    $37,927  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Fiscal Year Ended
(in thousands)
20152014
Audit Fees(1)
 $4,075
 $4,157
Audit-Related Fees(2)
 105
 416
Tax Fees(3)
    
Tax Compliance Services 116
 355
Tax Planning Services 501
 136
Total Tax Services (sum of Tax Fees) 617
 491
All Other Fees 
 
Total $4,797
 $5,064
(1)Fees for 2012 reflect amounts billed to date. The Company expects to pay additional fees relating to the 2012 audit, but the amount of such additional fees has not yet been determined.
(2)(1)Fees for audit services billed in 20122015 and 20112014 consisted of:

audit of the Company’s annual financial statements and internal control over financial reporting;
reviews of the Company’s quarterly financial statements;
statutory and regulatory audits, consents and other services related to SEC matters; and
financial accounting and reporting consultations.
Ÿ

Audit of the Company’s annual financial statements and internal control over financial reporting;

Ÿ

Reviews of the Company’s quarterly financial statements;

Ÿ

Statutory and regulatory audits, consents and other services related to SEC matters; and

Ÿ

Financial accounting and reporting consultations.

(3)(2)Fees for audit-related services billed in 2011 primarily related to audit work performed on the separation of the Xylem Inc.2015 and Exelis Inc. businesses from ITT. The remaining services billed in 2012 and 20112014 consisted of:

employee benefit plan audits;
permissible merger and acquisition services; and
other miscellaneous attest services.
Ÿ

Employee benefit plan audits;

Ÿ

Audits and other attest work related to acquisitions;

Ÿ

Internal control advisory services; and

Ÿ

Other miscellaneous attest services.

(4)(3)Fees for tax services billed in 20122015 and 20112014 consisted of tax compliance and tax planning and advice:

Tax compliance services are services rendered, based upon facts already in existence or transactions that have already occurred, to document, compute and obtain government approval for amounts to be included in tax filings consisting primarily of:
Ÿ

Tax compliance services are services rendered, based upon facts already in existence or transactions that have already occurred, to document, compute and obtain government approval for amounts to be included in tax filings consisting primarily of:

i.Federal,federal, foreign, state and local income tax return assistance;

ii.
Internal Revenue Code and foreign tax code technical consultations; and

iii.
Transfertransfer pricing analyses.

Ÿ

Tax planning services are services and advice rendered with respect to proposed transactions or services that alter the structure of a transaction to obtain an anticipated tax result. Such services consisted primarily of:

i.Tax advice related to the tax-free nature of the separation of the Xylem Inc. and Exelis Inc. businesses from ITT; and

ii.Tax advice related to intra-group restructuring.

(5)Fees for other services in 2011 consisted of consulting services in connection with the Company’s value-based commercial excellence programs and advice related to a financial information technology separation.



14



Tax planning services are services and advice rendered with respect to proposed transactions or services that alter the structure of a transaction to obtain an anticipated tax result. Such services consisted primarily of tax advice related to intra-group restructuring.
Pre-Approval of Audit and Non-Audit Services

The Audit Committee pre-approves audit services provided by Deloitte. The Audit Committee has also adopted a policy on pre-approval of permitted non-audit services provided by Deloitte and certain permitted non-audit services provided by outside internal audit service providers.Deloitte. The purpose of the policy is to identify thresholds for services, project amounts and circumstances where Deloitte and any outside internal audit service providers may perform permitted non-audit services. A second level of review and approval by the Audit Committee is required when such permitted non-audit services, project amounts or circumstances exceed the specified amounts.

The Audit Committee has determined that, where practical, all permitted non-audit services shall first be placed for competitive bid prior to selection of a service provider. Management may select the party deemed best suited for the particular engagement, which may or may not be Deloitte. Providers other than Deloitte shall be preferred in the selection process for permitted non-audit service-related work. The policy and its implementation areis reviewed and reaffirmed on a regular basis to assure conformance with applicable rules.

The Audit Committee has approved specific categories of audit, audit-related and tax services incremental to the normal auditing function,services, which Deloitte may provide without further Audit Committee pre-approval. These categories include, among others, the following:

1.Due diligence, closing balance sheet audit services, purchase price dispute support and other services related to mergers, acquisitions and divestitures;

2.Employee benefit advisory services, independent audits and preparation of tax returns for the Company’s defined contribution, defined benefit, and health and welfare benefit plans, preparation of the associated tax returns or other employee benefit advisory services;

3.Tax compliance and certain tax planning and advice work; and

4.Accounting consultations and support related to U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) or government contract compliance..

The Audit Committee has also approved specific categories of audit-related services, including the assessment and review of internal controls and the effectiveness of those controls, which outside internal audit service providers may provide without further approval.

If fees for any pre-approved non-audit services provided by either Deloitte or any outside internal audit service provider exceed a pre-determined threshold during any calendar year, any additional proposed non-audit services provided by that service provider must be submitted for second-level approval by the Audit Committee. Other audit, audit-related and tax services which have not been pre-approved are subject to specific prior approval. The Audit Committee reviews the fees paid or committed to Deloitte onduring regularly scheduled meetings and at least a quarterly basis.

other times as necessary.

The Company may not engagehas policies and procedures in place prohibiting, in some cases, employment of former Deloitte to provideemployees who were members of the services described below:

1.Bookkeeping or other services related to the accounting records or financial statements of the Company;

2.Financial information systems design and implementation;

3.Appraisal or valuation services, fairness opinions or contribution-in-kind reports;

4.Actuarial services;

5.Internal audit outsourcing services;

6.Management functions or human resources services;

7.Broker-dealer, investment adviser or investment banking services; or

8.Legal services and other expert services unrelated to the audit.

Employeesaudit engagement team.

Recommendation of Deloitte who are senior manager level or above, including lead or concurring partners and who have been involved with the Company in the independent audit, shall not be employed by the Company in any capacity for a periodBoard of five years after the termination of their activities on the Company account.

Directors

The Board of Directors unanimously recommends youa vote FOR the ratification of the appointment ofDeloitte to serve as the Company’s Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.

Item 3.Approval of the Material Terms of the ITT Corporation Annual Incentive Planindependent registered public accounting firm for Executive Officers

We request that shareholders approve the material terms of the ITT Corporation Annual Incentive Plan for Executive officers, as amended and restated on March 5, 2013. Approval of these material terms will permit the Company to provide tax-deductible incentive awards under the plan.

Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code places2016 fiscal year. Unless a limit of $1,000,000 on the amount we may deduct in any one year for compensation paid to our principal executive officer and our three other most highly-compensated executive officers other than our principal financial officer. Therecontrary choice is however, an exception to this limit for certain performance-based compensation. Awards made pursuant to the plan may constitute performance-based compensation and thereby avoid the deductibility limitation of Section 162(m).

To continue to qualify for this exception, the shareholders must reapprove the material terms of the performance goals of the plan every five years. In addition, if changes are made to the material terms of the performance goals, shareholder approval must be obtained. In 2013, our Compensation and Personnel Committee (the “Compensation Committee”) approved certain technical clarifications to the plan and one amendment to a material term of the plan, subject to shareholder approval at the 2013 Annual Meeting. The amendment allows the Compensation Committee to base awards on the size of the Company’s profit margins, whereas previously the plan had only allowed the Compensation Committee to base awards on the maintenance or improvement of the Company’s profit margins.

We are now submitting the material terms of the plan, as amended and restated, for approval at the 2013 Annual Meeting. If this proposal is not approved by shareholders, we will continue to grant awards under the plan, but certain awards to executive officers will not qualify as performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code and will therefore not be fully tax deductible.

Following is a description of the material terms of the plan, as amended and restated and approved by the Compensation Committee at its March 5, 2013 meeting. The description of the plan is qualified in its entirety by the actual provisions of the plan, which are attached to this Proxy Statement as Appendix B.

Plan History.    The Annual Incentive Plan for Executive Officers was originally adoptedspecified, proxies solicited by our Board in 1997 and approved by the shareholders at the annual meeting held May 15, 1997. The plan was amended and restated as of July 13, 2004 to amend the definition of an acceleration event to include mergers where ITT is the surviving entity, but not the initiator of a transaction. This amendment did not require shareholder approval. The plan was again amended and restated as of February 15, 2008 to expand the group of employees who are eligible to participate in the plan, expand the types of performance measures that can be used for awards, and to increase the plan’s limitation on the amount that can be paid under the plan to a participant during a specified period. This amendment was approved by the shareholders at the annual meeting held on May 13, 2008. The plan was again amended and restated as of October 4, 2011 to amend the definition of an acceleration event to provide that the consummation of certain transactions, rather than shareholder approval of such transactions, is necessary to constitute an acceleration event. This amendment did not require shareholder approval. The plan was previously known as the ITT Industries 1997 Annual Incentive Plan for Executive Officers. The plan has been renamed the ITT Corporation Annual Incentive Plan For Executive Officers.

Purpose of the Plan.    The primary purpose of the plan is to provide incentive compensation in the form of short-term cash incentives for achievement of specific pre-established performance objectives and to continue to motivate participating executive officers to achieve their business goals, while tying a portion of their compensation to measures affecting shareholder value. It is intended that awards under the plan qualify as “performance-based compensation” for purposes of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code so that we can fully deduct the incentive awards paid under the plan as business expenses for federal income tax purposes.

Eligibility.    The plan limits eligibility to our executive officers. For this purpose, the term “executive officers” is defined by reference to the definition of executive officer in Rule 3b-7 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, which defines executive officers as the president, any vice president of the company in charge of a principal business unit, division or function (such as sales,

administration or finance), any other officer who performs a policy making function or any other person who performs similar policy making functions for the company. Executive officers of subsidiaries may be deemed executive officers of the company if they perform such policy making functions for the company.

Not all individuals who are eligible to participate actually receive awards under the plan. Our Compensation Committee selects from the eligible group those to whom awards will be made.

Awards are based on performance against pre-established targets expressed as an objective formula overvoted FOR the performance period and are subjectratification of Deloitte.



15



Item 3.    Advisory Vote to negative discretion.

Plan Administration.    The plan is administered and interpreted by ourApprove Executive Compensation Committee. The committee approves the participants for any particular performance period, the applicable performance targets and the other key terms of the awards. To the extent permitted by law and the provisions of the plan, the committee may delegate to any officer or employee of the company authority to administer and interpret procedural aspects of the plan.

Description of Awards.    Incentive awards under the plan are based upon performance measured against pre-established performance targets over a specified performance period. The performance period used for awards is generally the calendar year; however, the committee may approve a different period. Within the first ninety days of the applicable performance period or, if sooner, prior to the time twenty-five percent of the relevant performance period has elapsed, the committee must establish, in writing, the performance targets applicable to each participant with respect to that performance period. The performance targets are based upon one or more performance measures and are expressed as an objective formula to be used in calculating the amount of the incentive award the participant will be eligible to receive at various levels of achievement. Performance targets are established at the discretion of the committee and can be expressed in absolute terms, as a goal relative to performance in prior periods, as a goal compared to the performance of comparable companies or an index covering multiple companies or in such other way as the committee prescribes.

Performance Measures.    Performance measures are based upon one or more of the following factors: consolidated earnings before or after taxes, net income, operating income, earnings per share, book value per share, return on shareholders’ equity, expense management, return on investment, improvements in capital structure, profitability of an identifiable business unit or product, profit margins, stock price, market share, revenues or sales (including organic revenue), costs, cash flow, working capital, return on assets, total shareholder return, return on invested or total capital and economic value added.

In addition, the following additional performance measures may also be used to the extent consistent with the requirements of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code: negotiating transactions or sales, implementation of company policy, development of long-term business goals or strategic plans, negotiation of significant corporate transactions, meeting specified market penetration goals, productivity measures, geographic business expansion goals, cost targets, customer satisfaction or employee satisfaction goals, goals relating to merger synergies, management of employment practices and employee benefits, or supervision of litigation and information technology, and goals relating to acquisitions or divestitures of subsidiaries and/or other affiliates or joint ventures; provided, however, that the measurement of any such performance measures must be objectively determinable.

The committee may not increase the amount payable to a participant under the plan. It may, however, reduce or totally eliminate the amount if deemed appropriate to reflect the participant’s performance or unanticipated factors during the performance period.

The terms of the awards may vary from year to year and from participant to participant.

Certification of Awards.    Following each performance period, the committee must certify in writing the degree to which the performance targets for each performance period have been achieved and the applicable amount to which the participant might be entitled.

Limitation on Award Amounts.    The plan limits the amount that can be paid with respect to awards to any one participant in any one calendar year to $8,000,000.

Payment of Awards.    If an award is earned, payment is made in cash as soon as practicable, and in any event no later than 2 and 1/2 months, after the end of the performance period. In the event of death, payment may be made to the participant’s estate. Amounts payable may be prorated or eliminated, at the discretion of the committee, in the event that the participant is not an employee on the last day of the performance period. The plan provides that, upon the occurrence of a change of control, payments will be made in cash promptly at the target achievement level for the entire performance period.

Amendment and Termination of the Plan.    The plan may be amended, modified or terminated by the Board, provided that no amendment, modification or termination that adversely affects outstanding awards may be made without consent of the participant holding the award.

Indemnification.    The plan provides that the company will indemnify and hold harmless committee and Board members against, and from, any loss, cost, liability or expense that may be imposed upon or incurred by them in connection with or resulting from claims, actions, suits or proceedings relating to their involvement with the plan.

Future Awards.    Since the determination of whether awards will be made and, if awards are made, the selection of plan participants and the key terms of awards, including performance targets, performance periods and performance measures are established each year in the discretion of our Compensation Committee, it cannot be determined at this time what amounts, if any, will be paid in the future.

Awards Contingent Upon Shareholder Approval.    Awards made in 2013 must be made contingent upon shareholder approval of the material terms of the plan at the 2013 Annual Meeting in order to qualify as performance-based compensation for purposes of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code. Accordingly, the Compensation Committee has made its approval of awards with respect to 2013 for certain officers that might be subject to Section 162(m) contingent upon shareholder approval of the material terms of the plan at the 2013 Annual Meeting.

Board of Directors Recommendation.

The Board believes that it is in the best interests of ITT Corporation and its shareholders to receive the full income tax deduction for performance-based compensation paid under the plan. The Board is therefore asking the shareholders to approve, for purposes of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, the material terms of the plan set forth above. The complete text of the plan is set forth as Appendix B hereto.

Approval of the material terms of the plan for purposes of Section 162(m) requires the affirmative vote of a majority of votes cast. Abstentions and broker non-votes will have no effect. Under the laws of the State of Indiana, the matter is approved if the votes cast in favor of the proposal exceed the votes cast against the proposal. Neither abstentions nor broker non-votes have any effect on the votes required under Indiana law.

Item 4.   Non-Binding Advisory Vote to Ratify Named Executive Officers’ 2012 Compensation

In accordance with the requirements of Section 14A of the Exchange Act and the related rules of the SEC, we are including in these proxy materials a separate resolution subject to shareholder vote to approve, in a non-binding vote, the 2012 compensation of our NEOs as disclosed later in this Proxy Statement in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis. The current frequency of non-binding

advisory votes on executive compensation is an annual vote, and we anticipate that the next votefollowing resolution will be submitted for a shareholder vote at next year’s annual meeting. The text of the resolution in respect of Proposal No. 4 is as follows:

Annual Meeting:

“RESOLVED, that the shareholders of ITT Corporation (the “Company”) approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation paid toof the Company’s named executive officersNamed Executive Officers, as disclosed in thisthe Company’s Proxy Statement for the 2016 Annual Meeting of Shareholders pursuant to the rulesItem 402 of the SEC,Securities and Exchange Commission Regulation S-K, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the compensation tables and any related narrative discussion, is hereby APPROVED.disclosures.

In considering their vote, shareholders may wish to review with care the information on the Company’s compensation policies and decisions regarding the NEOs presented in this Proxy Statement in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis elsewhere in this proxy statement.

Analysis.

In particular, shareholders should note that the Company’s Compensation and Personnel Committee bases its executive compensation decisions on the following:

Ÿ

alignment of executive and shareholder interests by providing incentives linked to earnings per share, free cash flow, operating margin and organic revenue performance;

Ÿ

the ability for executives to achieve long-term shareholder value creation without undue business risk;

Ÿ

creating a clear link between an executive’s compensation and his or her individual contribution and performance;

Ÿ

alignment of executive and shareholder interests by providing incentives linked to earnings per share, free cash flow, operating margin and revenue performance;
the ability for executives to achieve long-term shareholder value creation without undue business risk;
creating a clear link between an executive’s individual contribution and performance and his or her compensation;
the extremely competitive nature of the industries in which we operate and our need to attract and retain the most creative and talented industry leaders; and

Ÿ

comparability to the practices of peers in the industries that we operate in and other comparable companies generally.

While the results of the industries in which we operate and our need to attract and retain the most creative and talented industry leaders; and

comparability to the practices of peers in the industries that we operate in and other comparable companies generally.
The vote areon this resolution is not intended to address any specific element of compensation; rather, the vote relates to the compensation of our NEOs, as described in this Proxy Statement in accordance with the SEC's compensation disclosure rules.
The Board values the opinions of the Company’s shareholders as expressed through their votes and other communications. This vote is advisory in nature and non-binding; however, the Board will review and consider the shareholder vote when determining executive compensation. The current frequency of non-binding advisory votes on executive compensation is an annual vote, and we anticipate that the next vote will be at next year’s annual meeting.
Recommendation of the Board of Directors intends to carefully consider the results of the vote.

The Board of Directors unanimously recommends that youa vote FOR the approvaladvisory resolution approving the compensation of the 2012 compensationCompany’s Named Executive Officers as described in this Proxy Statement. Unless a contrary choice is specified, proxies solicited by our Board will be voted FOR this management proposal.
Item 4.Reapproval of our named executive officers.

Information aboutPerformance Measures Under the Board of Directors

Responsibilities of the Board of Directors.    The Board of Directors sets policy for ITT and advises and counsels the chief executive officer and the executive officers who manage the Company’s business and affairs. Corporation 2011 Omnibus Incentive Plan

The Board of Directors is responsibleasking shareholders to reapprove the material terms of the performance goals under the 2011 Plan so that certain performance-based compensation granted thereunder may continue to qualify as “performance-based compensation” under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code (“Section 162(m)”).
Background and Purpose of the Proposal
Section 162(m) places a limit of $1 million on the amount we may deduct in any one year for assuring that:compensation paid to our Chief Executive Officer and our other three most highly-compensated executive officers, other than our Chief Financial Officer. This limit does not apply, however, to certain performance-based compensation awards under the 2011 Plan that constitute “performance-based compensation” under Section 162(m). To qualify for this exception, shareholders must approve the material terms of the performance measures used in the plan. Section 162(m) further requires that in order to continue to qualify for this exception, shareholders generally must reapprove the material terms of the performance measures of the plan every five years.
The purpose of this proposal is to preserve the Company’s ability to grant awards under the 2011 Plan that qualify as performance-based compensation for purposes of Section 162(m). The material terms of the performance measures under the 2011 Plan are: the persons eligible to receive the performance-based compensation awards under the 2011 Plan, a description of the business criteria upon which performance awards will be based, and the maximum shares or cash value of awards that may be granted to an individual in any one year. These terms that are included in this proposal are the same as those stated in the 2011 Plan. If shareholders do not approve this proposal, we may be limited in our ability to grant awards that satisfy our compensation objectives and that are deductible.


16



Shareholder approval is only one of several requirements under Section 162(m) which must be met in order for compensation to qualify as performance-based compensation for purposes of Section 162(m). Even if our shareholders approve the proposal, there is no guarantee that all awards granted under the 2011 Plan will be treated as performance-based compensation, and we reserve the right to make awards of compensation that do not qualify for the performance-based compensation exception of Section 162(m).
Material Terms of the Performance Goals Under the 2011 Plan
Persons Eligible to Receive Performance-Based Compensation Under the 2011 Plan.

All ITT Corporation employees and directors and the employees of our subsidiaries and other affiliates are eligible to participate in the 2011 Plan. Because the 2011 Plan provides for broad discretion in selecting participants and in making awards, the total number of persons who will participate in the 2011 Plan and the benefits that will be provided to the participants cannot be determined at this time.
Performance Measures Under the 2011 Plan. The Compensation and Personnel Committee may grant awards under the 2011 Plan subject to the attainment of the following performance measures: net earnings, earnings per share, net income (before or after taxes), net sales growth, net operating profit, return measures (including, but not limited to, return on assets, capital, equity, or sales), productivity ratios, expense targets, working capital targets, cash flow (including, but not limited to, operating cash flow and free cash flow), cash flow return on capital, earnings before or after taxes, interest, depreciation and/or amortization, gross or operating margins, margins, operating efficiency, customer satisfaction, employee satisfaction metrics, human resources metrics, share price (including, but not limited to, growth measures and total shareholder return), and Economic Value Added or EVA®.
Performance measures may be based solely on the Company’s or an affiliate’s performance, on a business unit basis, or a combination thereof. Performance measures may reflect absolute entity performance or a relative comparison of entity performance to the performance of a group of comparator companies, or published or special index that the Compensation and Personnel Committee selects. The committee may also compare any performance measure to various stock market indices. The committee may provide in any award that any evaluation of performance may include or exclude any of the following events that occur during a performance period: (1) asset write-downs, (2) litigation or claim judgments or settlements, (3) the effect of changes in tax laws, accounting principles, or other laws or provisions affecting reported results, (4) any reorganization and restructuring programs, (5) extraordinary nonrecurring items as described in Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 225-30, and/or in the Company’s annual reports to shareholders for the applicable year, (6) acquisitions or divestitures, and (7) foreign exchange gains and losses.
Subject to the individual and 2011 Plan award limits described below, the number of performance-based awards granted to any participant in any year is determined by the Compensation and Personnel Committee in its sole discretion. The committee may reduce, but not increase, the value of a performance-based award.
Individual Award Limits. The maximum number of shares with respect to which stock options may be granted to an individual during any one year is 3,500,000. The maximum number of shares with respect to which stock appreciation rights may be granted to any individual during any one year is 3,500,000. The maximum number of shares of restricted stock or restricted stock units that may be granted to an individual during any one year is 700,000. The maximum number of shares with respect to other awards that may be granted to an individual during any one year is 700,000 and the maximum cash that may be payable with respect to other awards granted to an individual in any one year is $15,000,000. The maximum aggregate value of cash dividends or dividend equivalents that any individual may receive pursuant to awards in any one year shall not exceed $6,000,000.
Shareholder Approval
Shareholders approved the 2011 Plan at the 2011 annual meeting of shareholders. We are asking shareholders to reapprove the material terms of the performance measures under the 2011 Plan in order to permit us to grant performance-based awards that are not subject to the deduction limits under Section 162(m).
Recommendation of the Board of Directors
The Board of Directors unanimously recommends a vote FOR the reapproval of the 2011 Omnibus Incentive Plan performance-based compensation measures. Unless a contrary choice is specified, proxies solicited by our Board will be voted FOR the reapproval of the 2011 Omnibus Incentive Plan performance-based compensation measures.
Item 5.Shareholder Proposal Regarding Payout Policy
The following shareholder proposal will be voted on at the Annual Meeting if properly presented by or on behalf of the shareholder proponent. Other than minor formatting changes, we are reprinting the proposal and supporting statement as they were submitted to us, and we have not endeavored to correct any erroneous statements or typographical errors contained therein. Share holdings of the shareholder proponent, and where applicable, of co-filers, will be supplied upon request to the Company’s Corporate Secretary. Our Board of Directors has recommended a vote against the proposal for the reasons set forth


17



following the proposal.
Jonathan Kalodimos, PhD, 725 NW 29th Street, Corvallis, OR 97330, has submitted the following shareholder proposal.
Resolved: Shareholders of ITT Corporation ask the board of directors to adopt and issue a general payout policy that gives preference to share repurchases (relative to cash dividends) as a method to return capital to shareholders. If a general payout policy currently exists, we ask that it be amended appropriately.
Supporting statement: Share repurchases as a method to return capital to shareholders have distinct advantages relative to dividends. Share repurchases should be preferred for the following reasons:
Ÿ
1.

Financial flexibility. Four professors from Duke University and Cornell University studied executives’ decisions to pay dividends or make repurchases by surveying hundreds of executives of public companies. They found that “maintaining the Company’s businessesdividend level is on par with investment decisions, while repurchases are conductedmade out of the residual cash flow after investment spending.” Further, in conformity with applicable laws and regulations;

follow up interviews as part of the study, executives “state[d] that they would pass up some positive net present value (NPV) investment projects before cutting dividends.” The creation of long-term value is of paramount importance; I believe that repurchases have the distinct advantage that they do not create an incentive to forgo long-term value enhancing projects in order to preserve a historic dividend level.

Ÿ
2.

Tax efficiency. Share repurchases have been described in the Company’s systemsWall Street Journal as “akin to dividends, but without the tax bite for shareholders.” The distribution of financial reportinga dividend may automatically trigger a tax liability for some shareholders. The repurchase of shares does not necessarily trigger that automatic tax liability and internal controls are adequatetherefore gives a shareholder the flexibility to choose when the tax liability is incurred. Shareholders who desire cash flow can choose to sell shares and properly implemented and the Company has appropriate risk management structures in place;

pay taxes as appropriate. (This proposal does not constitute tax advice.)

Ÿ
3.

Market acceptance. Some may believe that slowing the growth rate or reducing the level of dividends would result in a negative stock market reaction. However, a study published in the Journal of Finance finds that the market response to cutting dividends by companies that were also share repurchasers was not statistically distinguishable from zero. I believe this study provides evidence that there is continuity in the leadership of the Company;

market acceptance that repurchases are valid substitutes for dividends.

Ÿ

management develops sound business strategies;

Ÿ

adequate capital and managerial resources are available to implement the business strategies;

Ÿ

the Company’s long-term strategies, significant investments in new businesses, joint ventures and partnerships and significant business acquisitions, including assessment of balance sheet impacts and other financial matters, are reviewed and approved; and

Ÿ

the Company’s operating plans and capital, research and development and engineering budgets are reviewed and approved.

Some may worry that share repurchases could be used to prop up metrics that factor into the compensation of executives. I believe that any such concern should not interfere with the choice of optimal payout mechanism because compensation packages can be designed such that metrics are adjusted to account for share repurchases.
In summary, I strongly believe that adopting a general payout policy that gives preference to share repurchases would enhance long-term value creation. I urge shareholders to vote FOR this proposal.
Recommendation of the Board of Directors

The Board of Directors unanimously recommends a vote AGAINST this proposal for the following reasons:
ITT’s Board of Directors believes that it is not in the best interests of the Company or its shareholders to adopt a formal policy giving preference to share repurchases relative to cash dividends as a method to return capital to shareholders. The Board believes that adoption of such a policy would unreasonably constrain the Company’s ability to consider market and business conditions in order to efficiently return capital to shareholders. Furthermore, as illustrated below, the Company’s practice over the preceding four years has effectively given preference to share repurchases relative to cash dividends. In light of this historical practice, the Board believes that adoption of the policy the proposal requests would be unnecessary, even if it were advisable.

The Board and management should have the flexibility to determine the proper allocation of capital and free cash flow that is in the best interests of shareholders.
The Board believes that a determination of the manner and amount of capital to be returned to shareholders, whether through share repurchases or dividends, is inherently fact-specific and rooted in our day-to-day business. These determinations are based on consideration of, among other factors, current and expected levels of financial performance and liquidity, the trading prices and volatility of a company’s shares, current and expected interest rates, the availability of alternative sources of capital


18



and potential competing uses of capital, including reinvestment in current lines of business, research and development, funding expansion, repaying debt or pursuing acquisitions and the ability to legally repurchase shares under applicable insider trading and market manipulation laws. In turn, each potential competing use of capital requires an analysis of the business environment, competitive conditions, economic trends, tax consequences and regulatory developments, among other factors. These decisions require careful review of the projected benefits and risks of potential courses of action and consultation among directors, executives and employees and with financial, legal, accounting and other advisors. The Board believes that these considerations are rooted in the directors’ fiduciary duties to the Company and our shareholders. As a result of the Board’s need to consider these factors when evaluating whether and how to return capital to shareholders, the Board believes that it would be inappropriate to adopt a general payout policy that gives preference to one method of returning capital to investors over another.
Although the proposal specifies little to alter the Board’s current practice, if adopted and applied consistently, it would place an unnecessary restriction on the Board’s ability to align the Company’s payout practices with current and future market conditions, corporate, securities and tax laws, and internal business considerations. The appropriate amount of share repurchases, on an absolute basis and relative to dividends, may vary significantly on a yearly, or even quarterly, basis. The Board is sensitive to these fluctuations and, while in agreement with Mr. Kalodimos that share repurchases have significant benefits, the Board believes that regular dividends also have significant benefits and should be retained regardless of whether the Company is actively repurchasing shares.
In addition, dividends are often seen as indicating that a company is reliably creating value for investors and efficiently managing expenditures, while reducing dividend payments is sometimes read as a sign of trouble. The Board is concerned that the existence of a stated policy giving preference to repurchases relative to dividends could restrict its ability to declare regular dividends if the Company determines that market conditions are unfavorable to repurchases, or that it would be more productive to use excess capital for another purpose. The Board accordingly does not believe the proposed policy is necessary or appropriate given the fact-intensive nature of these decisions.

The Company has a strong track record of continued prudent capital investment.
The Board agrees with Mr. Kalodimos that there are many benefits of share repurchases and has implemented buyback programs accordingly. Since 2012, the Company’s share repurchases have exceeded dividends, often by significant margins. The following table provides information regarding our repurchases and dividends for the last four fiscal years:
 Year Ended December 31,
($ in millions)2015201420132012
Aggregate repurchases$84.0$60.2$87.9$116.8
Dividends$42.8$40.7$36.4$34.2
Ratio of repurchases to dividends2.0x1.5x2.4x3.4x
Repurchases as % of capital return66.2%59.7%70.7%77.4%
The proposal is vague and ambiguous and therefore the Board is not certain about how it might implement the proposal if it were adopted.
The proposal requests that the Board adopt a general payout policy that “gives preference to share repurchases (relative to cash dividends)” as a method to return capital to shareholders (emphasis added). Adoption of such a policy would give rise to questions that would make it difficult to apply in practice, such as the extent to which the Company would be obligated to return capital to shareholders in accordance with this preference and how frequently adherence to the policy’s preference should be evaluated (e.g., quarterly, annually or over a multi-year period). In practice, the application of such a policy is likely to intrude into the authority of the Board with respect to the timing, manner and mechanics under which capital may be returned to shareholders. As a result, adoption of the proposal would likely complicate Board decision-making at the expense of the Board’s unfettered consideration of the best interests of the Company and its shareholders regarding the management of the Company’s capital.
Conclusion
In summary, the Board believes that our current approach obtains the relevant benefits of both share repurchases and dividends without unnecessarily and inadvisably impeding the flexibility that is necessary for the Company to respond effectively to changing circumstances.

Recommendation of the Board of Directors
The Board of Directors unanimously recommends a vote AGAINST this proposal. Unless a contrary choice is specified, proxies solicited by our Board will be voted AGAINST this shareholder proposal.


19



Corporate Governance Principles.and Related Matters
The Company strives to maintain the highest standards of corporate governance and ethical conduct. Maintaining full compliance with the laws, rules and regulations that govern our business, and reporting results with accuracy and transparency, are critical to those efforts. The Company monitors developments in the area of corporate governance and reviews its processes and procedures in light of such developments. The Company also reviews federal and state laws affecting corporate governance, as well as rules and requirements of the NYSE. The Company implements other corporate governance practices that it believes are in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders.
The following sections provide an overview of ITT’s corporate governance structure and processes, including the independence and other criteria we use in selecting director nominees; our leadership structure; and certain responsibilities and activities of the Board of Directors and its committees. Our corporate governance structure and processes are based on a number of key governance documents, which are described in the following pages.
The key governance documents, including the most current versions of the Company’s Corporate Governance Principles (the “Principles”), and the charters for the Audit, Compensation and Personnel, and Nominating and Governance Committees, are available on the Company’s website at www.itt.com/investors/governance/. The most current version of the Company’s Code of Conduct is available on the Company’s website at www.itt.com/citizenship/code-of-conduct/. Shareholders may also obtain copies of these documents free of charge by sending a written request to ITT Corporation, 1133 Westchester Avenue, White Plains, NY 10604, Attention: Corporate Secretary.
Corporate Governance Principles
The Board of Directors has adopted the CorporatePrinciples, which govern the operation of the Board of Directors and its committees and guide the Board of Directors and ITT’s leadership team in the execution of their responsibilities. The Nominating and Governance Principles.Committee is responsible for overseeing the Principles and reviews them at least annually and makes recommendations to the Board of Directors for updates in response to changing regulatory requirements, issues raised by shareholders or other stakeholders, changing regulatory requirements or otherwise as circumstances warrant. The Corporate GovernanceBoard may amend, waive, suspend, or repeal any of the Principles provide, amongat any time, with or without public notice, as it determines necessary or appropriate in the exercise of the Board’s judgment or fiduciary duties. As noted above, we have posted the Principles on our website at: www.itt.com/investors/governance/. Among other things, that Directorsmatters, the Principles include the following items concerning the Board:
no director may stand for re-election after he or she has reached the age of 72;
directors must be able to devote the requisite time for preparation and attendance at regularly scheduled Board and Board Committee meetings, as well as be able to participate in other matters necessary for good corporate governance. To help assure that Directorsgovernance;
directors are able to fulfill their commitments to the Company, the Corporate Governance Principles provide that Directors who are chief executive officers of publicly traded companies may not serve on more than two public company boards (including the ITT Board) in additionlimited to service on their own board. Directors who are not chief executive officers of publicly traded companies may not serve on more than four public company boards (including the ITT Board). The corporate governance principles and committee charters are reviewed byIf the Boarddirector serves as an active CEO of a public company, the director is limited to service on two public company boards (including the ITT board) in addition to service on his or her own board;
the CEO reports at least annually and posted on the Company’s website at http://www.itt.com/investors/governance/principles/. A copy of the Corporate Governance Principles will be provided, free of charge, to any shareholder upon request to the SecretaryBoard on succession planning and management development;
the Board evaluates the performance of ITT.

Leadership Structure.    The Board believes that the decision as to whether to combine or separate the Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of other senior management personnel at least annually; and

the Board of Directors positions will depend onmaintains a process whereby the factsBoard and circumstances facing the Company at a given timeits committees are subject to annual evaluation and could change over time. In today’s challenging economic and regulatory environment, Directors, more than ever, are required to spend a substantial amount of time and energy in successfully navigating a wide variety of issues and guiding the policies and practices of the companies they oversee. To that end, we believe that, although we doself-assessment.
Leadership Structure
Our Board does not have a formal policy with respect to the separation of the roles of Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer and instead takes a flexible approach to that question. The Board believes that this is a matter that should be discussed and determined by the Board from time to time and that each of the possible leadership structures for a board of directors has its particular pros and cons, which must be considered in the context of the specific circumstances, giving due consideration to the individuals involved, the culture and performance of the Company, the needs of the business, fulfillment of the duties of the Board and the best interests of the shareholders. Although the Board may determine to combine the roles of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer in the future, since 2011 the Board has determined that having separate individuals hold the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer positions that having a separate Chairman, whose sole job is to lead the Board,right leadership structure for the Board. This structure allows our Chief Executive Officer Ms. Ramos, to completely focus her time and energy on running the day-to-day operations of our Company. TheCompany’s business while the independent Chairman focuses on leading the Board believes that the Company’s current leadership structure does not affect the Board’s role in risk oversight of the Company.

its responsibilities.



20



Communication with the Board of Directors.    InterestedDirectors
Shareholders and other interested parties may contact all outside Directors as a group,any of the entire Board of Directors,Company’s directors (including the non-executive Chairman), a committee of the Board, of Directorsthe Board’s non-management directors as a group, or an individual Director by submitting a letter to the desired recipient in a sealed envelope labeled “Outside Directors,” “Board of Directors,” or with the name of the Board committee oras a specific Director. This sealed envelope should be placed in a larger envelope and mailedwhole by writing to the Secretary,them c/o ITT Corporation, 1133 Westchester Avenue, White Plains, NY 10604, USA. TheAttention: Corporate Secretary will forward the sealed envelope. Communications are distributed to the designated recipient.Board, or to any individual director or directors, as appropriate under the facts and circumstances. Junk mail, advertisements, product inquiries or complaints, resumes, spam and surveys are not forwarded to the Board. Material that is threatening, unduly hostile or similarly inappropriate will also not be forwarded, although any non-management director may request that any communications that have been excluded be made available.

Policies for Approving Related Person Transactions.Party Transactions
The CompanyBoard has adopted a written Related Party Transaction Policy (the “Policy”) that addresses the reporting, review and the Board have adopted formal written policies for evaluationapproval or ratification of potentialtransactions with related personparties. The Policy covers (but is not limited to) those related party transactions as those terms are defined inand relationships required to be disclosed under Item 404(a) of the SEC’s rulesRegulation S-K, and applies to each director or executive officer of the Company; any nominee for executive compensation and related person disclosure, which provide for review and pre-approvalelection as a director of transactions which maythe Company; any security holder who is known to the Company to own of record or are expected to exceed $120,000 involving Non-Management Directors, Executive Officers, beneficial ownersbeneficially more than 5% of five percent or moreany class of the Company’s common stock or other securitiesvoting securities; and any immediate family member of any of the foregoing persons (each, a “Related Party”).
The Company recognizes that transactions with Related Parties may involve potential or actual conflicts of interest and pose the risk that they may be, or be perceived to have been, based on considerations other than the Company’s best interests. Accordingly, as a general matter, the Company seeks to avoid such transactions. However, the Company recognizes that in some circumstances transactions between Related Parties and the Company may be incidental to the normal course of business, may provide an opportunity that is in the best interests of the Company to pursue or that may otherwise not be inconsistent with the best interests of the Company. In other cases it may be inefficient for the Company to pursue an alternative transaction. The Policy therefore is not designed to prohibit Related Party transactions; rather, it is designed to provide for timely internal reporting of such persons.transactions and appropriate review, oversight and public disclosure of them. The Policy supplements the provisions of the Company’s policy generally groups transactions with related persons into two categories: (1) transactions requiringCode of Conduct concerning potential conflict of interest situations. Under the approval ofPolicy, an amendment to an arrangement that is considered a Related Party transaction is, unless clearly incidental in nature, considered a separate Related Party transaction.
The Policy provides for the Nominating and Governance Committee to review all Related Party transactions and, (2) certainwherever possible, to approve such transactions including ordinary course transactions below established financial thresholds, that are deemed pre-approved by the Nominating and Governance Committee.

in advance of any such transaction being given effect. In reviewing related person transactions that are not deemed pre-approved for approvalconnection with approving or ratification,ratifying a Related Party transaction, the Nominating and Governance Committee will considerconsiders, in light of the relevant facts and circumstances, including:

Ÿ

Whether terms or conditions of the transaction are generallywhether or not the transaction is in, or not inconsistent with, the best interests of the Company, including, as applicable, consideration of the following factors:

the position within or relationship of the Related Party with the Company;
the materiality of the transaction to the Related Party and the Company, including the dollar value of the transaction, without regard to profit or loss;
the business purpose for and reasonableness of the transaction, taken in the context of the alternatives available to third-parties under similar terms or conditions;

Ÿ

Level of interest or benefit to the related person;

Ÿ

Availability of alternative suppliers or customers; and

Ÿ

Benefit to the Company.

The Nominating and Governance Committee is deemed to have pre-approved certain transactions identified in Item 404(a) of SEC Regulation S-K that are not required to be disclosed even if the amount involved exceeds $120,000. In addition, any transaction with another company at which a related person’s only relationship is as an employee (other than an executive officer), Director and/or beneficial owner of less than 10% of that company’s shares is deemed pre-approved; provided, however, that with respect to Directors, if a Director is a current employee, or if an immediate family member of the Director is a current executive officer, of a company that has made payments to, or received payments from, the Company for property or services in an amount which, in anyattaining the purposes of the last three fiscal years, exceedstransaction;

whether the greatertransaction is comparable to a transaction that could be available on an arms-length basis or is on terms that the Company offers generally to persons who are not Related Parties;
whether the transaction is in the ordinary course of $1 million,the Company’s business and was proposed and considered in the ordinary course of business; and
the effect of the transaction on the Company’s business and operations, including on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting and system of disclosure controls or 2%procedures, and any additional conditions or controls (including reporting and review requirements) that should be applied to such transaction.
The Policy provides standing pre-approval for certain types of such other company’s consolidated gross revenues, such transaction shall be reviewed bytransactions that the Nominating and Governance Committee andhas determined do not considered appropriate for automatic pre-approval. Regardlesspose a significant risk of whetherconflict of interest, either because a Related Party would not have a material interest in a transaction is deemed pre-approved, all transactions in any amount are required to be reportedof that type or due to the Nominating and Governance Committee. Subsequentnature, size and/or degree of significance to the adoption of the written procedures above, the Company has followed these procedures regarding all reportable related person transactions.Company. The Company’s Related Person Transaction Policy is posted on the Company’s website at: http://www.itt.com/investors/governance/transactions/.

re-evaluated periodically.



21



Code of Conduct.Conduct
The Company has also adopted the ITT Code of Conduct which applies to all employees, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer and, where applicable, to its Non-Management Directors.non-management directors. The Code of Conduct is also posted on the Company’s website at http://www.itt.com/citizenship/code-of-conduct/. The Company discloses on its website any changes or waivers from the Code of Conduct on its website for the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Principal Accounting Officer, its Non-Management Directorsnon-management directors and other executive officers. In addition, the Company will disclose within four business days any substantive changes in or waivers of the Code of Conduct granted to our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer, or persons performing similar functions. We will do this by posting such information on our website as set forth above rather than by filing a Form 8-K. AShareholders may obtain a copy of the Code of Conduct will be provided, free of charge to any shareholder uponby sending a written request to ITT Corporation at 1133 Westchester Avenue, White Plains, NY 10604, Attention: Corporate Secretary.
The Company has also established a confidential ethics phone line to respond to employees’ questions and reports of ethical concerns. Also, the SecretaryAudit Committee has established a policy with procedures to receive, retain and treat complaints received by the Company regarding accounting, internal controls or auditing matters, and to allow for the confidential, anonymous submission by employees of ITT.

concerns regarding accounting or auditing matters.

Director Independence.Independence
The Board of Directors, through the Nominating and Governance Committee, conducts an annual review of the independence of its members. With the assistance of legal counsel to the Company, the Nominating and Governance Committee has determined that allreviewed the applicable standards for Board and committee member independence, as well as the standards established by the Principles. A summary of the answers to annual questionnaires completed by each of the directors other than Ms. Ramosand a report of transactions with director-affiliated entities are independent. Foralso made available to the Nominating and Governance Committee to enable its comprehensive independence review. On the basis of this review, the Nominating and Governance Committee has delivered a directorreport to be considered “independent,”the full Board of Directors, and the Board has made its independence determinations based upon the committee’s report and the supporting information.
Under NYSE listing standards, an independent director must affirmatively determinenot have any material relationship with the Company, either directly or as a partner, shareholder or officer of an organization that the director has no direct or indirect materiala relationship with the Company. The Company’s Corporate Governance Principles defineNYSE requirements pertaining to director independence also include a series of objective tests, such as that the director is not an employee of the Company and has not engaged in accordancevarious types of business dealings with the Company. The Board also considers whether directors have any relationship that would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director. The Board has not adopted categorical standards of independence definitionother than those promulgated by the NYSE. The SEC has a separate independence requirement for audit committee members that overlays the NYSE requirements. The NYSE also recently promulgated rules requiring directors that serve on compensation committees to satisfy additional independence requirements specific to that service.
The Board of Directors has determined that Ms. Ramos is not “independent” because of her employment as Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company. The Board of Directors has reviewed all relationships between the Company and each other member of the Board of Directors and has affirmatively determined that Mr. Ashford, Mr. D’Aloia, Mr. Darnis, Mr. DeFosset, Ms. Gold, Ms. McDonald, Mr. Lavin, Mr. MacInnis and Mr. Powers are each “independent” pursuant to the applicable listing standards of the NYSE. None of these directors were disqualified from “independent” status under the objective tests set forth in the NYSE standards. In assessing independence under the subjective relationships test described above, the Board of Directors took into account the criteria for disqualification set forth in the NYSE’s objective tests, and reviewed and discussed additional information provided by each director and the Company with regard to each director’s business and personal activities as they may relate to the Company and its management. Based on the foregoing, as required by the NYSE, the Board made the subjective determination as to each of these directors that no material relationships with the Company exist and no relationships exist which, in the opinion of the Board of Directors, would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of such director. The Board also determined that the current members of the Audit Committee: Mr. D’Aloia, Mr. Darnis, Ms. Gold, Ms. McDonald, and Mr. Powers, and of the Compensation and Personnel Committee: Mr. Ashford, Mr. DeFosset, Ms. Gold, Mr. Lavin, and Ms. McDonald, meet the applicable SEC and NYSE corporate governance rules for listed companies. Withindependence requirements with respect to membership on such committees.
In making its independence determinations, the Board considered transactions occurring since the beginning of the Company’s 2013 fiscal year between the Company and entities associated with the directors or members of their immediate family. All identified transactions that appear to relate to the Company and a person or entity with a known connection to a director were presented to the Board of Directors for consideration. The Board also considered in its analysis the Company’s contributions to tax-exempt organizations with respect to each of the non-management directors. In making its subjective determination that each non-management director is independent, the Board considered the transactions in the context of the NYSE objective standards, the special standards established by the SEC for members of audit committees, and the SEC and Internal Revenue


22



Service (“IRS”) standards for compensation committee members. In each case, the Board determined that, because of the nature of the director’s relationship with the entity and/or the amount involved in the transaction, the relationship did not impair the director’s independence. In its review of Mr. Ashford,Ashford’s independence, the Board considered that he iswas an executive officer of a company that, in at least one of the preceding three fiscal years, received payments from the Company in an amount less than the greater of $1 million or 2% of his employer’s total netconsolidated gross revenues. With respectThe Company did not make any contributions to Mr. Lavin, the Board considered that he isany tax exempt organizations in which any non-management director serves as an executive officer of a company that, in at least one ofwithin the precedingpast three fiscal years received payments from the Company in an amount less thanwhere such contributions exceeded the greater of $1 million or 2% of his employer’s total net revenues. The Board also considered the Company’s charitable contributions to non-profit organizations with respect to each of the Non-Management Directors. No contributions exceeded 1% of thesuch organization’s consolidated gross revenues of any non-profit organization.

The Company’s Non-Management Directors must be independent and the Charters of the Audit, Compensation and Personnel and Nominating and Governance Committees also require all members to be independent Directors. Members of the Audit Committee must also satisfy a separate SEC and NYSE independence requirement, which provides that they may not be affiliates and may not accept directly or indirectly any consulting, advisory or other compensatory fee from the Company or any of its subsidiaries, other than their directors’ compensation. Each member of the Compensation Committee also qualifies as a “non-employee director” (as defined under Rule 16b-3 under the Exchange Act) and as an “outside director” (as defined in Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code).

Each year, the Company’s Directors and executive officers complete annual questionnaires designed to elicit information about potential related person transactions. Additionally, Directors and executive officers must promptly advise the Corporate Secretary if there are any changes to the information previously provided.

The Nominating and Governance Committee reviews and considers all relevant facts and circumstances with respect to independence for each Director standing for election prior to recommending selection as part of the slate of Directors presented to the shareholders for election at the Company’s Annual Meeting. The Nominating and Governance Committee reviews its recommendations with the full Board, which separately considers and evaluates the independence of Directors standing for re-election using the standards described above.

Ms. Ramos is not independent because of her position as Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company.

revenues.

Board and Committee Roles in Oversight of Risk.Risk
The Board of Directors has primary responsibility for overall riskis charged with oversight includingof the Company’s risk profilemanagement policies and practices with the objective of ensuring that appropriate risk management controls.systems are employed throughout the Company. ITT faces a broad array of risks, including market, operational, strategic, legal, political, international, and financial risks. The Audit CommitteeBoard monitors overall corporate performance, the integrity of the Company’s financial controls, and the effectiveness of its legal compliance and enterprise risk management programs, risk governance practices, and risk mitigation efforts. The Board receives reports from management on risk matters in the context of the Company’s annual strategy session and strategic planning reviews, the annual operating plan and budget reviews, and business reports and other updates provided at meetings of the Board. The various committees of the Board overseesalso participate in oversight of the Company’s operational and regulatory risk management efforts and risk assessment program, including all risk mitigation processes. The Nominating and Governance Committee has responsibility for assessing and monitoring the Company’s global risk profile, and provide regular reportsreport to the full Board with respect to their findings. In addition, thefor consideration and action when appropriate. The Company has established a cross-functional team of members of management referred to as the Risk Center of Excellence (the “RCOE”(“RCOE”), to internally monitor various risks. The Nominating and Governance CommitteeEach committee of the Board receives regular reports from the RCOE as well. Thewithin the relevant expertise of that committee. For example, the Compensation and Personnel Committee reviews and assesses compensation and incentive program risks to ensure that the Company’s compensation programs encourage innovation and balance appropriate business riskrisks and rewards without encouraging risk-taking behaviors whichthat may have a material adverse effect on the Company. The CompensationCompany, and it receives an annual report from the RCOE evaluating these risks. In addition to its duties in assessing major financial risk exposures, the Audit Committee structures compensation so that unnecessary or excessive risk-taking behavior is discouraged and behaviors correlated with long-term value creation are encouraged. The Board, Audit, Nominating and Governance and Compensation Committees receive regular reportsalso provides oversight of the Company’s policies with respect to the Company’s risk profileassessment and risk management controls.

management.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation.Participation
None of the members of the Compensation and Personnel Committee during fiscal year 20122015 or as of the date of this proxy statement hasProxy Statement have been an officer or employee of the Company and no executive officer of the Company served on the Compensation Committeecompensation committee or board of any company that employed any member of the Company’s Compensation and Personnel Committee or Board of Directors.

Director Selection and Composition.Composition
In fulfilling its responsibility to identify and recommend to the Board of Directors qualified candidates for membership on the Board, the Nominating and Governance Committee takes into account a variety of factors. Directors of the Company must be persons of integrity, with significant accomplishments and recognized business stature. The Nominating and Governance Committee desires that the Board of Directors be diverse in terms of its viewpoints, professional experience, education and skills as well as race, gender and national origin. In addition, ITT’s Corporate Governancethe Principles state that as part of the membership criteria for new Board members, individuals must possess such attributes and experiences as are necessary to provide a broad range of personal characteristics including diversity, management skills, and technological, business and international experience. On an annual basis, as part of its self-evaluation,The Nominating and Governance Committee desires that the Board of Directors assesses whether the mixbe diverse in terms of directors is appropriate for the Company. In addition, the Nominatingits viewpoints, professional experience, education and Governance Committee assesses the effectiveness of these criteria by referring to the criteria when it periodically assesses the composition of the Board.skills, as well as race, gender and national origin. The Board of Directors actively seeks to consider diverse candidates for membership on the Board when it has a vacancy to fill and includes diversity as a specific factor when conducting any search. search for candidates.
As part of its process in identifying new candidates to join the Board of Directors, the Nominating and Governance Committee considers whether, and to what extent, the candidate’s attributes and experiences will individually and collectively complement the existing Board, evaluating the current Board’s needs for operational, technical, management, financial, international or other expertise and recognizing that ITT’s businesses and operations are diverse and global in nature. In 2012,On an annual basis, as part of its self-evaluation, the full Board consisted of ten Directors. OutDirectors assesses whether its overall mix of the

ten Directors, three are female, and onedirectors is African American. Three of our 2012 Directors, Paul J. Kern, Markos I. Tambakeras and Linda S. Sanford, will retire fromappropriate for the Board effective as of the end of their term, which is the day immediately prior to the Annual Meeting. The retirement of Messrs. Kern and Tambakeras is in accordance with agreements entered into at the time of the separation of the Exelis Inc. and Xylem Inc. businesses from ITT. The eight nominees for Director for 2013 include two female nominees and one African American nominee. The Directors come from diverse professional backgrounds, including technology, financial and manufacturing industries.

Company.

To be considered by the Nominating and Governance Committee as a Directordirector candidate, a nominee must first meet the requirements of the Company’s By-laws and Corporate Governancethe Principles. In addition to these minimum qualifications, the Nominating and Governance Committee evaluates each nominee’s skills to determine if those skills are complementary to the skills demonstrated by current Board members. The Nominating and Governance Committee also evaluates the Board’s needs for operational, technical, management, financial, international or other expertise.

Prior to recommending nominees for election as Directors,directors, the Company’s Nominating and Governance Committee engages in a deliberative, evaluative process to ensure each nominee possesses the skills and attributes that individually and collectively will contribute to an effective Boardboard of Directors.directors. Biographical information for each candidate for election as a Directordirector is evaluated and candidates for election participate in interviews with existing Board members and management. Each candidate is subject to thorough background checks. Director nominees must be willing to commit the requisite time for preparation and


23



attendance at regularly scheduled Boardboard and Committeecommittee meetings and participation in other matters necessary for good corporate governance.

The Nominating and Governance Committee identifies Directordirector candidates through a variety of sources including personal references and business contacts. On occasion, the Nominating and Governance Committee utilizes a search firm to identify and screen Directordirector candidates and pays a fee to that firm for each such candidate elected to the Board of the Company.ITT Board. The Nominating and Governance Committee will also consider Directordirector nominees recommended by shareholders for electionshareholders. Shareholders who wish to the Company’s Board who meet the qualification standards described above. (See Section II.F. ofrecommend candidates may contact the Nominating and Governance Committee Charter at http://www.itt.com/investors/governance/nominating/ ) Thein the manner described in “Communication with the Board of Directors.” Shareholder nominations must be made according to the procedures required by our By-laws and described in this Proxy Statement under the heading “How does a shareholder submit a proposal or nominate directors for the 2017 annual meeting of shareholders?” Shareholder-recommended candidates and shareholder nominees whose nominations comply with these procedures and who meet the criteria referred to above will be evaluated by the Nominating and Governance Committee also evaluates and makes recommendationsin the same manner as other nominees.
Ten individuals served on ITT’s Board during 2015. Geraud Darnis was elected to the Board of Directors concerning appointment of Directors to Board Committees, selection of Board Committee Chairs, Committee member qualifications, Committee member appointment and removal, Committee structure and operations and proposal ofon October 20, 2015. Of the Board slate10 directors who are nominees for election at the Annual Meeting, three are female, and one is African American. The directors come from diverse professional backgrounds, including technology, financial and manufacturing industries. In “Proposals to be Voted on at the 2016 Annual Meeting – Item 1 – Election of Shareholders, consistentDirectors,” we provide an overview of the background of each nominee, including their principal occupation, business experience and other directorships, together with criteria approved bythe key attributes, experience and skills viewed as most meaningful in providing value to the Board, of Directors. For the 2013 Annual Meeting, the Nominatingour Company and Governance Committee, each member of which is a Non-Management Director, consistent with the Nominating and Governance Committee Charter and after careful evaluation and consideration of his qualifications for service on the Company’s Boardour shareholders.
Executive Sessions of Directors recommended that the Board nominate Mr. Lavin to serve as a Director of the Company.

Committees

Agendas for meetings of the Board of Directors.Directors include regularly scheduled executive sessions for the independent directors to meet without management present; the Board’s non-executive Chairman leads those sessions. Board members have access to our employees outside of Board meetings, and the Board encourages directors to visit different Company sites and events periodically and meet with local management at those sites and events, either as part of a regularly scheduled Board meeting or otherwise.
Board and Committee Meetings and Membership
The standing CommitteesBoard of Directors and its committees meet throughout the year on a set schedule, and also hold special meetings and act by written consent from time to time as appropriate. Under the Principles, directors are expected to attend all meetings of the Board described below perform essential corporate governance functions.

and all meetings of the committees of which they are members. Members may attend by telephone or video conference to mitigate conflicts, although in-person attendance at regularly scheduled meetings is strongly encouraged. The Board of Directors held eight meetings during the 2015 fiscal year and there were 17 meetings of standing committees. All directors attended at least 75% of the aggregate of all meetings of the Board and standing committees on which they served. It is Company practice that all directors attend the Company’s annual meetings. All directors who were on the Board at that time attended the Company’s 2015 annual meeting of shareholders either in person or telephonically, with the exception of Timothy H. Powers.

The Board of Directors has an Audit Committee,

a Compensation and Personnel Committee and a Nominating and Governance Committee. The following table summarizes the current membership of each Committee:
2012 NameAudit Committee Members:
Compensation
and Personnel
Nominating and
Governance
Orlando D. Ashford üü
G. Peter D’AloiaChair
Geraud Darnisü 
Donald DeFosset, Jr.üü
Christina A. GoldüChair
Rebecca A. McDonaldüü
Richard P. Lavin Linda S. Sanfordüü
Frank T. MacInnis Donald J. Stebbins (appointed on March 1, 2012)Chair
Timothy H. Powers
ü ü
Denise L. Ramos


24



The charters of each of the Audit, Compensation and Personnel, and Nominating and Governance Committees conform with the applicable NYSE listing standards, and each committee periodically reviews its charter, as regulatory developments and business circumstances warrant. Each of the committees, from time to time, considers revisions to their respective charters to reflect evolving best practices.
Audit Committee
The purpose of the Audit Committee is to assist the Board of Directors in fulfilling its responsibility to oversee management’s conduct of the financial reporting process. The responsibilities of the Audit Committee include:
selection and oversight of the independent registered public accounting firm, including responsibility to determine the independent auditor’s qualifications, independence, scope of responsibility and compensation;
review and discussion with management and the independent auditor regarding the annual audited and quarterly unaudited financial statements and approval of inclusion of those financial statements in the Company’s public filings;
review and oversight of the Company’s selection and application of accounting principles and issues relating to the Company’s internal controls and disclosure controls and procedures;
oversight of the Company’s compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, including review of the effect of regulatory and accounting initiatives on the Company’s financial statements;
oversight of the structure and scope of the Company’s internal audit function; and
assist the Board in fulfilling its oversight of enterprise risk management, particularly through oversight of the Company’s policies with respect to risk assessment and risk management and the Company’s major financial risk exposures.
The Audit Committee has established policies and procedures for the pre-approval of all services by the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee also has established procedures for the receipt, retention and treatment, on a confidential basis, of complaints received by the Company regarding its accounting, internal controls and auditing matters. Additional details on the role of the Audit Committee may be found in “Item 2-Ratification of the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” earlier in this Proxy Statement.
The Board of Directors has determined that each member of the Audit Committee is financially literate and independent, as defined by the rules of the SEC and the NYSE, as well as independent under the Principles. Although more than one member of the Board of Directors satisfies the requirements of the audit committee financial expert, the Board of Directors has identified G. Peter D’Aloia as the audit committee financial expert.Meetings in 2012:9Responsibilities:

Ÿ    Subject to any action that may be taken by the full Board, the Audit Committee has the ultimate authority and responsibility to determine the independent auditor’s qualifications, independence and compensation, and to appoint (or nominate for shareholder ratification), evaluate, and where appropriate, consider rotation or replacement of the independent auditor.

Ÿ    Review and discuss with management and the independent auditor, and approve the annual audited financial statements and quarterly financial statements of the Company, including discussion of the Company’s disclosures under Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, and make a recommendation regarding inclusion of those financial statements in any public filing including the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (or the Annual Report to Shareholders if distributed prior to the filing of Form 10-K) and Quarterly Reports on form 10-Q.

Ÿ    Review and consider with the independent auditor matters required to be discussed by Statement on Auditing Standards. No. 61, as amended by AICPA, Professional Standards, Vol. 1.AU Section 380 (the framework of effective communication between the independent auditor and the Company in relation to the audit of financial statements), as adopted by the PCAOB in Rule 3200T.

Ÿ    Review with management and the independent auditor the effect of regulatory and accounting initiatives on the Company’s financial statements.

Ÿ    As a whole, or through the Audit Committee chair, review and discuss with the independent auditor the Company’s interim financial results to be included in the Company’s earnings report or quarterly reports to be filed with the SEC, including discussion of the Company’s disclosures under Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations prior to the filing of its Form 10-Q with the SEC.

Ÿ    Review and discuss with management the types of information to be disclosed and the types of presentations to be made with respect to the Company’s earnings press releases (paying particular attention to the use of any “pro forma” or “adjusted” non-GAAP information and measures) and financial information and earnings guidance provided to analysts and rating agencies.

Ÿ    Discuss with management and the independent auditor the adequacy and effectiveness of the Company’s internal controls, including the responsibilities, budget, compensation and staffing of the Company’s internal audit function, and meet regularly and privately with the head of the internal audit function.

Ÿ    Annually request from the independent auditor a formal written statement delineating all relationships between Deloitte and the Company, consistent with the PCAOB Rule 3526. With respect to such relationships, the Audit Committee shall:

Ÿ    discuss with the independent auditor any disclosed relationships and the impact of the relationship on the independent auditor independence; and

Ÿ    assess and recommend appropriate action in response to the independent auditor’s report to satisfy itself of the auditor’s independence.

Ÿ    Pre-approve or delegate to one or more independent members, when appropriate, to pre-approve the retention of the independent auditor for audit-related and permitted non-audit services. Other tax-related consulting and special projects and fees for any other services to be provided by the independent auditor and internal audit service providers must be submitted to the Audit Committee consistent with the Company’s Audit Services, Audit-Related Services and Non-audit Services Policy.

Ÿ   Confirm the scope of audits to be performed by the independent auditor and any outside internal audit service provider, monitor progress and review results.

Ÿ   On an annual basis, discuss with the independent auditor its internal quality control procedures, material issues raised in quality control or peer review and any inquiries by governmental or professional authorities in the last five years (and any steps taken to deal with issues raised) regarding the firm’s independent audits of other clients. In addition, the Committee will, on a regular basis, review the experience and qualifications of the lead partner and reviewing partner and determine that all partner rotation requirements, as promulgated by applicable rules and regulations, are executed.

Ÿ    Review significant findings or unsatisfactory internal audit reports or audit problems or difficulties encountered by the independent auditor in the course of the audit work, including any restrictions on the scope of its activities or on access to requested information, and any significant disagreements with management, and monitor management’s response to such matters. Without excluding other possibilities, the Audit Committee may wish to review with the independent auditor (i) any accounting adjustments that were noted or proposed by such firm but were “passed” (as immaterial or otherwise), (ii) any communications between the audit team and the audit firm’s national office respecting auditing or accounting issues presented by the engagement and (iii) any “management” or “internal control” letter issued, or proposed to be issued, by the independent auditor to the Company.

Ÿ    Provide oversight and discuss with management, internal auditors and the independent auditor, the adequacy and effectiveness of the Company’s overall risk assessment and risk management process, including all risk mitigation processes.

Ÿ    Establish and maintain free and open means of communication between and among the Audit Committee, the Company’s independent auditor, the Company’s internal audit function, management and the Board.

Ÿ    Review its performance and Charter at least annually and make recommendations to the Board of Directors for approval and adoption of its Charter.

Ÿ    Review the Company’s rating agency reviews.

Ÿ    Review regularly and consider the Company’s environmental, safety and health reserves.

Ÿ    Review the expense accounts of senior executives.

Ÿ    Update the Board of Directors on a regular basis with respect to matters coming to its attention that may have a significant impact on the Company’s financial condition or affairs, the Company’s compliance with legal or regulatory requirements and the performance and independence of the independent auditor and the internal audit function.

Ÿ   Review major issues regarding accounting principles and financial statement presentations, significant changes to the Company’s selection or application of accounting principles and major issues relating to the Company’s internal controls including any specifically required steps to correct identified major internal control issues. The Audit Committee also reviews management’s and the independent auditor’s analyses regarding significant financial reporting issues and judgments made in preparing financial statements including analyses of alternative GAAP methods as well as the effect of regulatory and accounting initiatives and off-balance sheet structures, if any, on the Company’s financial statements.

Ÿ    In conjunction with the Board of Directors, evaluate the qualifications of its members and its own performance on an annual basis.

Ÿ    Meet separately, on a regular basis, with the independent auditor, internal auditors and members of management, as well as privately as a Committee.

Ÿ    Establish policies regarding the Company’s employment and retention of current or former employees of the independent auditor.

Ÿ    With respect to complaints concerning accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters:

Ÿ    review and approve procedures for receipt, retention and treatment of complaints received by the Company; and

Ÿ    establish procedures for the confidential, anonymous submission of complaints by employees of the Company regarding questionable accounting or auditing matters to the Audit Committee.

Ÿ    Establish levels for payment by the Company of fees to the independent auditor and any advisors retained by the Audit Committee.

Ÿ    Receive regular reports from the Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and from the Company’s disclosure control committee representative on the status of the Company’s disclosure controls and related certifications, including disclosure of any material weaknesses or significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls and any fraud that involves management or other employees with a significant role in internal controls.

Ÿ    Prepare the Report of the Audit Committee required by the SEC to be included in the Company’s Proxy Statement.

Ÿ    Meet regularly with the Company’s general counsel or head of ethics and compliance to review the implementation and effectiveness of the Company’s Code of Conduct and ethics and compliance program and any proposed waivers of the Code of Conduct for directors and officers.

Independence

The Board of Directors has determined that each member of the Audit Committee meets the independence standards set out in the Board’s Corporate Governance Principles and its Audit Committee Charter, the requirements of the NYSE currently in effect and Rule 10A-3 under the Exchange Act. The Board of Directors has evaluated the performance of the Audit Committee consistent with the regulatory requirements.

A copy

The current members of the Audit Committee Charter is available on the Company’s website

http://www.itt.com/investors/governance/audit/are G. Peter D’Aloia (Chair), Geraud Darnis (appointed October 20, 2015) Christina A. Gold, Rebecca A. McDonald and Timothy H. Powers (appointed August 13, 2015). The Company will provide, free of charge,Richard P. Lavin was a copymember of the Audit Committee Charteruntil a restructuring of committees was approved by the Board of Directors to any shareholder, upon request tobe effective as of August 13, 2015. The Audit Committee held nine meetings during the Secretary2015 fiscal year. The report of ITT.

the Audit Committee is included on page 29 of this Proxy Statement.

Compensation and Personnel Committee

2012 Compensation and Personnel Committee Members:

    Christina A. Gold, Chair
    Linda S. Sanford
    Donald DeFosset, Jr.
    Paul J. Kern
    Orlando D. Ashford

Meetings in 2012:

5

Responsibilities:

The Compensation Committee’s primary objective is to establish a competitive executive compensation program that clearly links executive compensation to business performance and shareholder return, without excessive enterprise risk, including through the following:

Ÿ   Approve and oversee administration of the Company’s employee compensation program including incentive plans and equity-based compensation plans.

Ÿ   Evaluate senior management and Chief Executive Officer performance, evaluate enterprise risk and other risk factors with respect to compensation objectives, set annual performance objectives for the Chief Executive Officer and approve individual compensation actions for the Chief Executive Officer and for the remaining corporate officers.

Ÿ   Oversee the establishment and administration of the Company’s benefit programs for its executive officers.

Ÿ    Select, retain and determine the terms of engagement for independent compensation and benefits consultants and other outside counsel, as needed, to provide independent advice to the Committee with respect to the Company’s current and proposed executive compensation and benefit programs. In 2012 and prior years, the Committee obtained such advice.

Ÿ    Review and discuss the Company’s talent review and succession planning process for senior executive positions and review with the full Board of Directors, which provides final approval.

Ÿ    Regularly report to the Board of Directors on compensation, benefits, continuity and related matters.

Ÿ    Review and discuss with the Company’s management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis required by Item 402(b) of Regulation S-K or such other similar proxy rule requirements. Based on such review and discussion, determine whether to recommend to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in the Company’s annual report or proxy statement for the annual meeting of stockholders.

Ÿ    Prepare the Compensation Committee Report for the Company’s Proxy Statement.

Ÿ    Review regularly and consider the Company’s Inclusion & Diversity strategy and the effectiveness of related programs and policies.

Ÿ    Review its performance and Charter at least annually and make recommendations to the Board of Directors for approval and adoption of its Charter.

Independence

The purpose of the Compensation and Personnel Committee is to provide oversight review of compensation and benefits of the employees of the Company. The responsibilities of the Compensation and Personnel Committee include:
oversight and administration of the Company’s employee compensation program, including incentive plans and equity-based compensation plans;
establishment of annual performance objectives, evaluation of performance and approval of individual compensation actions for the Chief Executive Officer and other executive officers;
review and discussion of the Company’s talent review and development process, succession planning process for senior executive positions and aspects of culture and diversity for the Company, and provision of recommendations to the Board of Directors;
review, discussion and approval of the Compensation Discussion and Analysis included in the Company’s annual proxy statement; and
assist the Board in fulfilling its oversight of enterprise risk management, particularly risks in connection with the Company’s compensation and talent management programs.
The Board of Directors has determined that each member of the Compensation Committee meets the independence standards set out in the Board’s Corporate Governance Principles and its Compensation and Personnel Committee Charteris independent, as defined by the rules of the SEC and the requirementsNYSE, as well as independent under the Principles. In addition, each committee member is a “non-employee director” as defined in Rule 16b-3 under the Exchange Act and an “outside director” as defined in


25



Section 162(m). The Board of Directors has evaluated the NYSE currently in effect.

A copyperformance of the Compensation and Personnel Committee Charter is available on the Company’s website http://www.itt.com/investors/governance/compensation/ . consistent with regulatory requirements.

The Company will provide, free of charge, a copycurrent members of the Compensation and Personnel Committee Charter to any shareholder, upon request toare Christina A. Gold (Chair), Orlando D. Ashford, Donald DeFosset, Jr., Richard P. Lavin and Rebecca A. McDonald (appointed on August 13, 2015). The Compensation and Personnel Committee held four meetings during the Secretary2015 fiscal year. The report of ITT.

the Compensation and Personnel Committee is included on page 30 of this Proxy Statement.

Nominating and Governance Committee

2012 Nominating and Governance Committee

Members:

    Frank T. MacInnis, Chair
    Donald DeFosset, Jr.
    Paul J. Kern
    Markos I. Tambakeras
    Orlando D. Ashford

Meetings in 2012:

4

Responsibilities:

Ÿ   Develop, annually review, update and recommend to the Board of Directors corporate governance principles for the Company.

Ÿ   In the event it is necessary to select a new chief executive officer, lead the process for candidate evaluation, consideration and screening. The full Board of Directors has the final responsibility to select the Company’s chief executive officer.

Ÿ   Evaluate and make recommendations to the Board of Directors concerning the size, composition, governance and structure of the Board.

Ÿ   Make recommendations to the Board of Directors concerning the qualifications, compensation and retirement age of Directors.

Ÿ   Administer the Board of Directors’ annual evaluation process.

Ÿ   Consider questions of independence and possible conflicts of interest of members of the Board of Directors and executive officers and ensure compliance with the rules of the NYSE and the Clayton Antitrust Act.

Ÿ   Review and recommend to the full Board matters and agenda items relating to the Company’s Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

Ÿ   Review the form of Annual Report to Shareholders, Proxy Statement and related materials.

Ÿ   Review the Company’s business continuity and disaster recovery programs and plans.

Ÿ   Review significant risks related to the Company and the mitigation plans monitored by the RCOE.

Ÿ   Review the Company’s communication and advertising program and other activities involving community relations, major charitable contributions and promotion of the Company’s public image.

Ÿ   Determine desired Board and Director skills and attributes and conduct searches for prospective board members whose skills and attributes reflect those desired for the Board of Directors.

Ÿ   Identify, evaluate and propose nominees for election to the Board of Directors. Consider shareholder nominees for election to the Board.

Ÿ   Make recommendations to the Board of Directors concerning the appointment of Directors to Board Committees and the selection of Board Committee Chairs.

Ÿ   Evaluate and make recommendations regarding senior management requests for approval to accept memberships on outside boards.

Ÿ   Review all material related party transactions prior to initiation of the transaction and make recommendations to the Board of Directors for approval or disapproval.

Ÿ    Review the results of any review by the Company’s independent auditor of the Company’s policies relating to the ethical handling of conflicts of interest and review of past or proposed transactions between the Company and members of management as well as policies and procedures with respect to officers’ expense accounts and perquisites, including the use of corporate assets, when the results of such reviews are reported to the Audit Committee.

Ÿ    Review and discuss the Company’s risk management program.

Ÿ    Review its performance and Charter at least annually and make recommendations to the Board of Directors for approval and adoption of its Charter.

Independence

The purpose of the Nominating and Governance Committee is to ensure that the Board of Directors is appropriately constituted to meet its fiduciary obligations to shareholders of the Company. The responsibilities of the Nominating and Governance Committee include:
evaluate and make recommendations to the Board of Directors concerning the size, composition, governance and structure of the Board and the qualifications, compensation and retirement age of directors;
identify, evaluate and propose nominees for election to the Board of Directors;
consider questions of independence and possible conflicts of interest of directors and executive officers and ensure compliance with applicable laws and NYSE listing standards;
develop, regularly review, update and recommend to the Board of Directors corporate governance principles for the Company;
review of material related party transactions in accordance with the Policy and review with the independent auditor the Company’s policies for the ethical handling of conflicts of interest and its policies and procedures with respect to expense accounts and perquisites;
assist the Board in fulfilling its oversight of enterprise risk management, particularly risks in connection with the Company’s corporate governance structures and processes and risks related to other primarily nonfinancial matters (for example, business continuity); and
lead the Company’s chief executive officer succession process.
The Board of Directors has determined that each member of the Nominating and Governance Committee meetsis independent, as defined by the independence standards set out inrules of the Board’s Corporate Governance Principles and its Nominating and Governance Committee CharterSEC and the requirementsNYSE, as well as independent under the Principles. The Board of Directors has evaluated the NYSE currently in effect.

A copyperformance of the Nominating and Governance Committee Charterconsistent with regulatory requirements.

As stated above, the Nominating and Governance Committee evaluates the compensation program for the non-management directors and makes recommendations to the Board regarding their compensation. The Nominating and Governance Committee has retained Pay Governance LLC (“Pay Governance”) as an independent consultant for this purpose. Pay Governance’s responsibilities include providing market comparison data on non-management director compensation at peer companies, tracking trends in non-management director compensation practices, and advising the Nominating and Governance Committee regarding the components and levels of non-management director compensation. The Nominating and Governance Committee is availablenot aware of any conflict of interest on the Company’s website http://www.itt.com/investors/governance/nominating/. part of Pay Governance arising from these services or any other factor that would impair Pay Governance’s independence. Executive officers do not play any role in either determining or recommending non-management director compensation.
The Company will provide, free of charge, a copycurrent members of the Nominating and Governance Committee Charter to any shareholder, upon request to the Secretary of ITT.

Meetings of the Boardare Frank T. MacInnis (Chair), Orlando D. Ashford, Donald DeFosset, Jr., Richard P. Lavin (appointed on August 13, 2015) and Committees

During 2012, there were five regularly scheduled Board meetings and 18 meetings of standing Committees. In addition, there were an additional three Board meetings. All Directors attended at least 75% of the aggregate of all meetings of the Board and standing Committees on which they served. It is Company practice that all Directors attend the Company’s Annual Meeting. All Directors attended the Company’s 2012 Annual Meeting. For 2013, the Board has scheduled five regular meetings. In conjunction with the regular meetings, those Directors who are not employees of ITT are scheduled to meet privately (without management) following each Board meeting during the year.

2012 Non-Management Director Compensation

Timothy H. Powers. The Board of Directors reviewed Non-Management Director compensation levels in October 2012 with Pay Governance LLC, an independent compensation consulting firm, to ensure that the Company’s Non-Management Director compensation levels are competitive. As a result of that review, the Nominating and Governance Committee andheld four meetings during the 2015 fiscal year.



26



2015 Non-Management Director Compensation Committee recommended, and the Board approved, a compensation package effective as of the date of the 2013 Annual Meeting consisting of $100,000 annual cash retainer and an annual equity retainer solely in the form of RSUs of $90,000.
The Non-Executive Chairman will receive an additional annual payment in the amount of $125,000 (payable in 50% cash and 50% RSUs), the Audit Committee Chair will receive an additional annual cash payment in the amount of $15,000, the Compensation Committee Chair will receive an additional annual cash payment in the amount of $10,000 and, at any time that the Nominating and Governance Committee Chair is not also the Non-Executive Chairman, the Nominating and Governance Committee Chair will receive an additional annual cash payment in the amount of $10,000.

The following table below represents the 2012 grant date fair value of Non-Management Director2015 compensation computed in accordance with GAAP.for our non-management directors. As discussed in more detail in the narrative following the table, all Non-Management Directorsnon-management directors receive the same cash fees and stock awards for their service, (exceptwhich consists of a $100,000 annual cash retainer and an annual RSU award with a value of $90,000, except for the following: Mr. MacInnis, as Non-Executive Chairman, received an additional $62,500 cash payment and stock awards with an additional grant date fairRSU award with a value of $62,500; and Mr. D’Aloia as Audit Committee Chair, received an additional $15,000 cash payment).payment; and Ms. Gold as Compensation and Personnel Committee Chair, received an additional $10,000 cash payment. As an employee Director,a management director, Ms. Ramos does not receive compensation for Board service.

Compensation is paid to non-management directors in a lump sum following the annual meeting at which they are elected. Non-management directors who join the Board of Directors during the course of a year receive their compensation promptly following their election, in amounts that are pro-rated to reflect their partial year of service on the Board. Non-management directors may also choose to defer receipt of either or both of their cash retainer and equity retainer. The grant date fair value of stock

awards granted to Non-Management Directorsnon-management directors in 20122015 is provided in footnote (2) to the table.table below. Stock awards are composed of RSUs.

Name

  Fees
Earned or
Paid in
Cash
(1) ($)
   Stock
Awards
(2) ($)
   Total
($)
 

Orlando D. Ashford

   141,666.67     90,004.80     231,671.47  

G. Peter D’Aloia

   115,000.00     90,004.80     205,004.80  

Donald DeFosset, Jr.

   100,000.00     90,004.80     190,004.80  

Christina A. Gold

   100,000.00     90,004.80     190,004.80  

Paul J. Kern

   100,000.00     90,004.80     190,004.80  

Frank T. MacInnis

   162,500.00     152,500.80     315,000.80  

Linda S. Sanford

   100,000.00     90,004.80     190,004.80  

Donald J. Stebbins

   116,666.67     90,004.80     206,671.47  

Markos I. Tambakeras

   100,000.00     90,004.80     190,004.80  

Name
Fees Earned or Paid in Cash(1)
Stock
Awards(2)
Total
Orlando D. Ashford$100,000
$90,009
$190,009
G. Peter D’Aloia115,000
90,009
205,009
Geraud Darnis(3)
66,667
60,013
126,680
Donald DeFosset, Jr.100,000
90,009
190,009
Christina A. Gold110,000
90,009
200,009
Richard P. Lavin100,000
90,009
190,009
Frank T. MacInnis162,500
152,531
315,031
Rebecca A. McDonald100,000
90,009
190,009
Timothy Powers(4)
125,000
112,510
237,510
(1)Fees earned may be paid in cash at the time they are earned, or deferred, at the election of the Director, in cash or deferred cash. Non-Management Directorsdirector. Non-management directors may irrevocably elect deferral into an interest-bearing cash account or an accountinto the ITT Corporation Stock Fund, which is a tracking fund that tracks an index of the Company’sinvests in Company stock. With respect to Messrs. Ashford and Stebbins, the compensation as reported represents compensation for greater than a twelve-month period.

(2)Awards are made in RSUs and they reflect thea grant date fair value computed in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification (“FASB ASC”) Topic 718, Stock Compensation. Non-Management Directors do not receive differing amounts of equity compensation, except for Mr. MacInnis who received an additional grant value of $62,500 in May 2012 as the Non-Executive Chairman.GAAP. The grant date fair value of the RSUs granted on May 8, 2012,2015, the date of the Company’s 2012 Annual Meeting,2015 annual meeting, was $90,004.80.$90,009. The closing price of ITT stock on that date was $22.06.$41.46.

The following table represents restricted common
(3)Mr. Darnis was elected to the Board of Directors on October 20, 2015 and therefore he received compensation that was pro-rated to reflect his partial year of service on the Board for the 2015-2016 director term. He was paid cash of $66,667 and was granted RSUs on October 20, 2015 with a grant date fair value of $60,013 on the grant date. The closing price of ITT stock on that date was $36.46.
(4)Mr. Powers was elected to the Board of Directors on February 26, 2015 and therefore he received compensation that was pro-rated to reflect his partial year of service on the Board for the 2014-2015 director term. He was paid cash of $25,000 and was granted RSUs on February 26, 2015 with a grant date fair value of $22,501 on the grant date. The closing price of ITT stock on that date was $41.21. He also received the compensation described in footnote (1) and (2) for service related to the 2015-2016 director term.


27



Non-Management Director Stock Awards and stock options outstanding as ofOption Awards Outstanding at December 31, 2012 for Non-Management Directors. 2015 Fiscal Year-End
Non-Management Director Name
Stock 
Awards
Option Awards
Orlando D. Ashford2,171

G. Peter D’Aloia9,536

Geraud Darnis1,646

Donald DeFosset, Jr.4,390

Christina A. Gold20,308

Richard P. Lavin2,171

Frank T. MacInnis15,750
1,430
Rebecca A. McDonald2,171

Timothy Powers2,171

Outstanding restricted common stock awards include unvested RSUs granted under the 2011 Plan and vested but deferred restricted stockshares and RSUs.

Non-Management Director Restricted Common Stock and

Stock Option Awards Outstanding at 2012 Fiscal Year-End

Non-Management

Director Name

  Outstanding
Restricted Common
Stock Awards
   Outstanding
Stock Option
Awards
 

Orlando D. Ashford

   4,080       

G. Peter D’Aloia

   6,299       

Donald DeFosset, Jr.

   6,299       

Christina A. Gold

   16,407     4,260  

Paul J. Kern

   8,897     4,525  

Frank T. MacInnis

   11,451     4,260  

Linda S. Sanford

   6,038     7,485  

Donald J. Stebbins

   4,080       

Markos I. Tambakeras

   4,080     7,485  

RSUs granted to Non-Management Directors vest one business day prior tounder the Annual Meeting. Restricted shares previously awarded under2011 Plan, the ITT 1996 Restricted Stock Plan for Non-Employee Directors (the “1996 Plan”), which precededand the ITTAmended and Restated 2003 Restricted Stock Plan for Non-Employee Directors (the “2003 Plan”),Equity Incentive Plan. RSUs granted to non-management directors vest one business day prior to the next annual meeting. Unvested RSUs do not earn dividends or carry voting rights while unvested, however dividend equivalents are accrued during this period and under which restricted shares are still outstanding, provided that each Director’s restricted shares are heldpaid out in escrow, and they may not be transferred in any manner until onecash following vesting of the following events occurs:

Ÿ

The fifth anniversary of the grant of the shares unless extended as described below.

Ÿ

The Director retires at age 72.

Ÿ

There is a change of control of the Company.

Ÿ

The Director becomes disabled or dies.

Ÿ

The Director’s service is terminated in certain specified, limited circumstances.

Ÿ

Any other circumstance in which the Compensation Committee believes, in its sole discretion, that the purposes for which the grants of restricted stock were made have been fulfilled and, as such, is consistent with the intention of the Plan.

Under the 2003 Plan and the 1996 Plan, Non-Management Directors may choose to extend the restriction period for not more than two successive five-year periods, or until six months and one day following the Non-Management Director’s termination from service from the Board under certain permitted circumstances.

The 1996 Plan also provided if a Director ceased serving on the Board under any other circumstances, shares with respect to which the 1996 Plan restrictions have not been lifted would be forfeited. Under the 2003 Plan, the period of restriction for restricted stock granted is five years. The Compensation Committee may determine that a Director, whose service from the Board is terminated, has fulfilled the purpose for which the grant of restricted stock was made and lift the restriction for all or a portion of restricted stock grants. Time and form of payment for outstanding restricted stock received after 2004, as well as elections to have the cash retainer deferred after 2004, have been modified, with the consent of each Director, to comply with Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (“Section 409A”). Section 409A deals specifically with non-qualified deferred compensation plans and provides requirements and rules for timing of deferrals and distributions under those plans.

award.

ITT reimburses Directorsdirectors for expenses they incur to travel to and from Board, Committee and shareholder meetings and for other Company-business related expenses (including travel expenses of spouses if they are specifically invited to attend an event for appropriate business purposes).

Non-Management Director Share Ownership Guidelines.  ITT’s share ownership guidelines currently provide for non-management directors to achieve share ownership levels of five times the annual base cash retainer amount within five years of joining the Board. Non-management directors receive a portion of their retainer in RSUs, which are paid in shares when the RSUs vest. Non-management directors are required to hold such shares until their total share ownership meets or exceeds the ownership guidelines. Both the guidelines, and compliance with the guidelines, are monitored periodically. All non-management directors with at least one full year of service on the Board of Directors own stock in the Company. Directors are also subject to the Company’s policy prohibiting hedging and speculative trading in and out of the Company’s securities, including short sales and leverage transactions, such as puts, calls, and listed and unlisted options. The Company also prohibits directors from pledging Company securities as collateral for a loan.
Indemnification and Insurance.  As permitted by its By-laws, ITT indemnifies its Directorsdirectors to the full extent permitted by law and maintains insurance to protect the Directorsdirectors from liabilities, including certain instances where itITT could not otherwise indemnify them. All Directorsdirectors are covered under a non-contributory group accidental death and dismemberment policy that provides each of them with $1,000,000 of coverage. They may elect to purchase additional coverage under that policy. Non-Management DirectorsNon-management directors also may elect to participate in an optional non-contributory group life insurance plan that provides $100,000 of coverage.



28

Report of the Audit Committee

The following Report of the



Audit Committee does not constitute soliciting material and the Report should not be deemed filed or incorporated by reference into any other previous or future filings by the Company under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent the Company specifically incorporates this Report by reference therein.

Role of the Audit Committee.    The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors provides oversight on matters relating to the Company’s financial reporting process and ensures that the Company develops and maintains adequate financial controls and procedures, and monitors compliance with these processes. This includes responsibility for, among other things:

Ÿ

determination of qualifications and independence of Deloitte & Touche LLP (“Deloitte”);

Ÿ

the appointment, compensation and oversight of Deloitte in preparing or issuing audit reports and related work;

Ÿ

review of financial reports and other financial information provided by the Company, its systems of internal accounting and financial controls, and the annual independent audit of the Company’s financial statements;

Ÿ

oversight and review of procedures developed for consideration of accounting, internal accounting controls and auditing-related complaints;

Ÿ

review of risk assessment and risk management processes on a company-wide basis; and

Ÿ

adoption of and monitoring the implementation and compliance with the Company’s Non-Audit Services Policy.

determination of qualifications and independence of Deloitte, the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm;
appointment, compensation and oversight of Deloitte in preparing or issuing audit reports and related work;
review of financial reports and other financial information provided by the Company, its systems of internal accounting and financial controls, and the annual independent audit of the Company’s financial statements;
oversight and review of procedures developed for consideration of accounting, internal accounting controls and auditing-related complaints;
review of the Company’s policies with respect to risk assessment, risk management and the Company’s major financial risk exposures;
monitoring all elements of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting; and
adoption of and monitoring the implementation and compliance with the Company’s Non-Audit Services Policy.
The Audit Committee also has oversight responsibility for confirming the scope and monitoring the progress and results of internal audits conducted by the Company’s internal auditor. The Audit Committee discussed with the Company’s internal auditors and Deloitte the plans for their respective audits. The Audit Committee met with the internal auditors and Deloitte, with and without management present, and discussed the results of their examinations, their evaluation of the Company’s internal controls, and the Company’s financial reporting.

The Company’s management has primary responsibility for the financial statements, including the Company’s system of disclosure and internal controls. The Audit Committee may investigate any matter brought to its attention. In that regard, the Audit Committee has full access to all books, records, facilities and personnel of the Company, and the Audit Committee may retain outside counsel, auditors or other independent experts to assist the Committee in performing its responsibilities. Any individual may also bring matters to the Audit Committee confidentially or on an anonymous basis, by submittingfollowing the matterprocedures set forth in a sealed envelope addressed tothis Proxy Statement under the “Audit Committee” toheading “Communication with the Corporate Secretary who then forwards the sealed envelope to the Audit Committee.

Sarbanes-Oxley ActBoard of 2002 (“SOX”) Compliance.    The Audit Committee has responsibility for monitoring all elements of the Company’s compliance with Sections 302 and 404 of SOX relating to internal control over financial reporting.

Directors.”

Audit Committee Charter.    The Board of Directors has adopted a written charter for the Audit Committee, which the Board of Directors and the Audit Committee review, and at least annually update and reaffirm. The Chartercharter sets out the purpose, membership and organization, and key responsibilities of the Audit Committee.

Composition of the Audit Committee.    The Audit Committee comprises four members of the Company’s Board. The Board of Directors has determined that each Audit Committee member meets the independence standards set out in the Audit Committee Charter and in the Company’s Corporate Governance Principles and the requirements of the New York Stock Exchange currently in effect, including the audit committee independence requirements of Rule 10A-3 under the Exchange Act. No member of the Audit Committee has any relationship with the Company that may interfere with the exercise of independence from management and the Company. All members of the Audit Committee, in the business judgment of the full Board of Directors, are financially literate and several have accounting or related financial management expertise.

2012 Members of the Audit Committee.    The 2012 members of the Audit Committee are G. Peter D’Aloia, Chair, Christina A. Gold, Linda S. Sanford and Donald J. Stebbins. Mr. Stebbins was appointed to the Audit Committee on March 1, 2012.

Regular Review of Financial Statements.    During 2012,2015, the Audit Committee reviewed and discussed the Company’s audited financial statements with management. The Audit Committee, management and Deloitte reviewed and discussed the Company’s unaudited financial statements before the release of each quarter’s earnings report and filing on Form 10-Q, and the Company’s audited financial statements before the annual earnings release and filing on Form 10-K.

Communications with Deloitte.  The Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed with management and Deloitte the matters required to be discussed byunder the statement on Auditing Standards No. 61, as amended (AICPA, Professional Standards, Vol. 1. AU section 380) as adopted bystandards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board in Rule 3200T (“SAS 61”).PCAOB. These discussions included all matters required by SAS 61, including Deloitte’s responsibilities under generally accepted auditing standards in the United States, significant accounting policies and management judgments, the quality of the Company’s accounting principles and accounting estimates. The Audit Committee met privately with Deloitte nineeight times during 2012.2015.

Independence of Deloitte.   Deloitte is directly accountable to the Audit Committee and the Board of Directors. The Audit Committee has received the written disclosures and the letter from Deloitte required by applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight BoardPCAOB regarding Deloitte’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence and has discussed with Deloitte their independence from management and the Company, any disclosed relationships and the impact of those relationships on Deloitte’s independence.

Recommendation Regarding Annual Report on Form 10-K.    In performing its oversight function with regard to the 20122015 financial statements, the Audit Committee relied on financial statements and information prepared by the Company’s management. It also relied on information provided by the internal audit staff as well as Deloitte. The Audit Committee reviewed and discussed with management the Company’s audited financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2012.2015. Based on these discussions, and the information received and reviewed, the Audit Committee recommended to the Company’s Board of Directors that the Company’s financial statements be included in the 2012Company’s 2015 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

This report is furnished by the members of the Audit Committee.

G. Peter D’Aloia, Chair

Christina A. Gold

Linda S. Sanford

Donald J. Stebbins

G. Peter D’Aloia (Chair)Geraud DarnisTimothy H. Powers
Christina A. GoldRebecca A. McDonald


29

Compensation Committee Report

The following Report of the



Compensation and Personnel Committee does not constitute soliciting material and the Report should not be deemed filed or incorporated by reference into any other previous or future filings by the Company under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent the Company specifically incorporates this Report by reference therein.

ITT’s Compensation and Personnel Committee (“Compensation Committee”) is responsible for the overall design and governance of the Company’s executive compensation program, senior leadership development and talent management programs. The Compensation and Personnel Committee’s primary objective is to establish a competitive executive compensation program that clearly links executive compensation to business performance and shareholder return. The Compensation and Personnel Committee considers and monitors appropriate risk factors in structuring compensation to discourage unnecessary or excessive risk-taking behaviors and encourage long-term value creation.

Recommendation Regarding Compensation Discussion and Analysis

In performing its governance function, with regard to the following Compensation Discussion and Analysis, prepared by management, the Compensation and Personnel Committee relied on statements and information prepared by the Company’s management. It also relied on information provided by Pay Governance, LLC, the independent compensation consultant to theGovernance. The Compensation Committee. The Compensationand Personnel Committee reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis included in this Proxy Statement with management. Based on this review and discussion, the Compensation and Personnel Committee recommended to the Company’s Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in the Company’s 2015 Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2012 and this Proxy Statement.

This report is furnished by the members of the Compensation and Personnel Committee.

Christina A. Gold, Chair

Orlando D. Ashford

Donald DeFosset, Jr.

Paul J. Kern

Linda S. Sanford

Christina A. Gold (Chair)Donald DeFosset, Jr.Rebecca A. McDonald
Orlando D. AshfordRichard P. Lavin


30

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS



Compensation Discussion and Analysis
Executive Summary
In 2015, we continued to focus on building and implementing our sustainable growth model for the future. Our 2015 financial results reflected strong net operating productivity and effective cost containment in a challenging macroeconomic environment, which included declining oil and gas markets, weaker than expected general industrial markets, and the negative impacts of foreign exchange.
Our 2015 business performance was as follows:
Revenue down 6% to $2.5 billion and organic revenue down 1%,
GAAP operating income increased 43% and adjusted operating income was up 9% excluding foreign exchange,
Adjusted EPS increased 3% to $2.55, up 13% excluding foreign exchange, and
Record adjusted operating income margins of 12.8%.
Over the past three years, our total shareholder returns have significantly outpaced the S&P 400 Capital Goods Index, of which ITT is a member.
During 2015, we continued to make significant investments in our people, focusing on talent management and building capabilities to grow and develop leaders internally. These personnel investments will enable the Company to identify and develop leaders with a greater focus on effective succession planning. These efforts, combined with the work started in 2013 on creating a healthy, high performing culture, will allow the Company to focus its investment on leaders that will help drive and execute the Company’s strategy in the years to come.
In this Compensation Discussion and Analysis, we explain the Compensation and Personnel Committee’s executive compensation philosophy, andidentify the performance objectives for each of the named executive officers as defined by the SEC in Item 402(a) of Regulation S-K (“NEOs”),our NEOs, describe all elements of the Company’s executive compensation program, and explain why the Compensation and Personnel Committee selected each compensation component. The Compensation Committee’s decisions were based, in part, on the support received for our compensation programs in last year’s executive compensation advisory vote. The Compensation Discussion and Analysis should be read in conjunction with our tabular disclosures regarding the compensation of our NEOs for 2012,2015, which can be found elsewhere in this Proxy Statement under the heading “Compensation Tables.”

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

MAKING AN

•    Setting High Expectations

ENDURING IMPACT

•    Increasing Accountability and Transparency

•    Remaining Accountable to Shareholders

In October 2011, ITT completed a separation by spinning off our defense

What is new for 2015?
As we considered 2015 and water businesses to establish a “New ITT,” a diversified global, industrial company (the “Spin Transaction”). This transaction has allowed us to focus our talents and energy on highly engineered industrial products that supply solutions to the transportation, industrial and energy markets.

As a smaller and more focused company in 2012 we were able to meet the challenges of the slowing economy. Our size allowed us to be more nimble and responsive to the declines in demand for industrial products. We used these advantages to drive our initial progress and gain momentum quickly despite uncertain economic conditions. Our efforts were reinforced through our long-standing commitment to our people and our guiding principles of leading with technology, differentiating with customers and optimizing our work.

LOGO

2012 marks the first full year of the New ITT. During this time of significant change we created value for our Company and our customers, and generated strong returns for our shareholders.

YEAR ONE – A NEW ITT

It was a year of progress and performance, with a focus on building and implementing our sustainable growth model for the future, which we call “The ITT Way.” In our first full year as the New ITT:

LOGO

We exceeded our 2011 performance in internal Company-wide financial areas, including organic revenue growth, earnings per share (“EPS”), and free cash flow.

LOGO

Generated a total shareholder return (“TSR”) of 23%,reflecting 21% growth in our stock price and assumed reinvestment of our quarterly dividend.

LOGO

We focused on building our systems and infrastructureto enable sustained growth, effective management of our portfolio of businesses and successful deployment of our significant available cash.

LOGO

We completed the acquisition of Bornemann Pumps in the fourth quarter which positions ITT as a leader in the oil and gas industry.

OUR 2012 BUSINESS SUMMARY AND RESULTING NEO COMPENSATION ACTIONS

The Company’s2016 executive compensation philosophy ties a substantial percentagedesign, we were mindful of NEO compensation to business performance and share price performance, and our 2012 NEO compensation actions reflect this philosophy and our business results. Many of our NEOs, including our Chief Executive Officer, Denise Ramos, received no base salary increases in 2012 due to the fact that, at the time of the Spin Transaction, we evaluated NEO pay and made adjustments for those NEOs at that time. We reintroduced EPS as a primary goal in our Annual Incentive Plan in order to better align our NEOs’ financial interests with shareholder interests. Our long-term incentive grant practices reflected our commitment to not just increasing the Company’s stock price, but out-performing our industry peers. Finally, we continued to adopt and modify good governance policies in executive compensation that protect shareholder interests and reduce enterprise risk.

The following chart highlights our financial performance in fiscal year 2012 and the related effects on 2012 NEO compensation.

LOGO

Considerations of Say-on-Pay Vote

In 2012, the Company’s advisory votevotes on executive compensation in the last three years, which resulted in just under94%, 95% and 95%, respectively, of shareholder votes cast in favor of our proposal, up from 91% in the advisory 2011 vote.

LOGO

proposals.

We remain committed to continuing the best pay practices and pay-for-performance approach to executive compensation that has resulted in aconsistently high positive vote percentage in 2011percentages.
In August 2015, the Compensation and 2012.

Best Pay Practices

We continued to monitor our executive compensation programs in 2012 to ensure they reflect best pay practices in lightPersonnel Committee approved the elimination of the business needsautomobile allowance for NEOs and certain other executives based in the U.S., effective January 1, 2016. This decision was based on our approach of aligning compensation practices to prevalent market practices and reducing perquisites where appropriate. With the exception of the Company. Set forth below areCEO, the actions we took in 2012 and in previous years to promote and reinforcebest pay practices:

LOGO

Changes Ahead

For 2013, we are changing our mix of long-term incentive compensation. The TSR Awards will now be known as Performance Units and they will include both a Relative Total Shareholder Return metric as well as a Return on Invested Capital metric, equally weighted. The Return on Invested Capital metric is a measure of our ability to deploy our unique capital available. We will also grant and settle these Performance Unit awards in shares following a three-year performance period to provide better shareholder alignment. The Performance Units will also be increased to 50%annual value of the automobile allowance was converted into salary and annual bonus target for each individual, such that the annual total target long-term incentive value provided to NEOs. This will reducecash compensation of each individual remained constant. The Compensation and Personnel Committee did not adjust the weighting of Restricted Stock Units (“RSUs”) and stock options granted under the long-term incentive plan.

We also intend to begin amending our executive severance plans to reduce severance amounts to senior executives in the event of termination of employment, to better align those benefits with current competitive practices. These changes will take place over time as the existing plans have limits on when changes become effective.

As we continue to tell the story of The ITT Way, we will continue to set high expectations for ourselves and seek out new opportunities for sustainable growth and value creation for all stakeholders – customers, employees, partners, communities and shareholders.

COMPENSATION PROCESS

Our Management Team

At the timesalary or bonus target of the Spin Transaction, we established a new management team to leadCEO in conjunction with eliminating the Company. This team underwent certain changes in 2012. The disclosure of our NEO compensation for 2012 covers the following executive officers, including leaders of certain of our business segments (“Segments”):

Ÿ

Denise L. Ramos, Chief Executive Officer and President

Ÿ

Aris C. Chicles, Executive Vice President

Ÿ

Thomas M. Scalera, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Ÿ

Robert J. Pagano, Jr., Senior Vice President and President – Industrial Process

Ÿ

Luca Savi, Senior Vice President and President – Motion Technologies

Ÿ

William E. Taylor, former Senior Vice President and President – Interconnect Solutions

Ÿ

Thomas F. Korber, former Senior Vice President – Human Resources

In 2012, Messrs. Korberautomobile allowance.



31



Governance and Taylor came to mutual agreements with the Company to end their employment with the Company. The terms and conditions of their termination agreements are discussed elsewhere under the heading “Post-Employment Compensation.”

Executive Compensation Philosophy

We believe that our underlying executive compensation programs areprogram is appropriate and effective in motivating and rewarding the behaviors that create long-term shareholder value.
Executive Compensation Philosophy
We have designed our compensation programs to help us recruit and retain the executive talent required to successfully manage our business, achieve our business objectives and maximize their long-term contributions to our success. We provide compensation elements that are designed to align the interests of executives with our goals of enhancing shareholder value and achieving our long-term strategies. We provide targetdetermine total annual compensation that approximatesby reviewing the median with significant upside for superior performance.of the competitive market, then positioning above or below the median based on experience, performance, critical skills, and the general talent market. The Compensation and Personnel Committee looks to both peer companies and published compensation surveys as an important input to understand compensation levels for similarsenior executives.

Key Participants in the Compensation Process
ElementsRole of the Compensation and Personnel Committee.

Annual base salary,  The Compensation and Personnel Committee reviews and approves each of the compensation targets for all of the Company’s executive officers, including the NEOs. The Compensation and Personnel Committee reviewed each compensation element for the CEO and other NEOs, and made the final determination regarding such compensation elements. The Compensation and Personnel Committee also makes determinations with respect to the annual incentives, and long-term incentives provide the foundation for our NEO compensation. Annual cash incentives are awarded under our Annual Incentive Planincentive plan (“AIP”), which uses metrics that we believe are as it relates to our executive officers, including the fundamental measurementsapproval of annual performance goals and subsequent full-year achievement against those goals. It administers all elements of the strengthCompany’s long-term incentive plan, and approves the benefits and perquisites offered to executive officers. Further, the Compensation and Personnel Committee evaluates all compensation programs on an annual basis to ensure that no plans induce or encourage excessive risk-taking by its participants. Pursuant to its charter, the Compensation and Personnel Committee may delegate authority to act upon specific matters to a subcommittee.

Role of Management.    During 2015, the Company’s CEO and its Chief Human Resources Officer made recommendations to the Compensation and Personnel Committee regarding executive compensation actions and incentive awards. The Chief Human Resources Officer serves as the liaison between the Compensation and Personnel Committee and Pay Governance, providing internal data on an as-needed basis so that Pay Governance can produce comparative analyses for the Compensation and Personnel Committee. In 2015, the Company’s human resources, finance and legal departments supported the work of the CompanyCompensation and Personnel Committee, by providing information, answering questions and responding to various requests of committee members.
Role of the Independent Compensation Consultant.    In 2015, the Compensation and Personnel Committee continued to use the services of Pay Governance in fulfilling its obligations under its charter, the material terms of which create long-term shareholder value. The performance metrics selected are described elsewhere in this Compensation Discussion and AnalysisProxy Statement under the heading “AIP Performance Metrics Selection Process”. We provide three types of awards under our Long Term Incentive Plan: RSUs, stock options, and cash awards called Total Shareholder Return (“TSR”) Awards (“TSR Awards”). TSR Awards are based on the performance of the Company’s share price over a three-year period as compared to that of peer companies, reflecting how we create shareholder value relative to our peer group.

The Role of Risk and Risk Mitigation

In 2012, the Compensation Committee evaluated risk factors associated with the Company’s businesses in determining compensation structure and pay practices. The structure“Committees of the Board of Directors’ Committees facilitatesDirectors.”

Pay Governance attended each of the four meetings held by the Compensation and Personnel Committee in 2015 and provided the committee with objective expert analyses, assessments, research and recommendations for executive compensation programs, incentives, perquisites, and compensation standards. In this evaluationcapacity, they provided services that related solely to work performed for, and determination. More specifically, during 2012,at the Chairdirection of, the Compensation and Personnel Committee, including analysis of material prepared by management for the Compensation and Personnel Committee’s review. Pay Governance provided no other services to the Company during 2015. The total amount of fees paid to Pay Governance for 2015 services was a member$192,055. In addition, the Company reimburses Pay Governance for reasonable travel and business expenses.
The Compensation and Personnel Committee selected Pay Governance to serve as its Independent Compensation consultant only after assessing the firm’s independence. As part of its independence review, the Audit Committee. This membership overlap provides insight intoCompensation and Personnel Committee reviewed the Company’s business risksrelationship with Pay Governance and affords the Compensation Committee access to the information necessary to consider the impactdetermined that no conflicts of business risks on compensation structure and pay practices. Further, overall enterprise risk is considered and discussed at Board meetings, providing additional important information to the Compensation Committee. The Chief Executive Officer and President, and the Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, attend those portions of the Compensation Committee meetings at which plan features and design configurations of the Company’s annual and long-term incentive plans are considered and approved.

We believe our executive compensation program appropriately balances risk with maximizing long-term shareholder value. The following features of our executive compensation program especially contribute to the achievement of this goal:

Ÿ

Emphasis on long-term compensation.    By targeting long-term incentive compensation at 40% to 65% of our NEOs’ total compensation package, the Compensation Committee believes that it is encouraging strategies that correlate with the long-term interests of the Company. The Company’s long-term incentive awards, described elsewhere in this Compensation Discussion and Analysis under the heading “Elements of Compensation — 2012 Long-Term Incentive Compensation,” feature a three-year vesting threshold for senior vice presidents and 10-year option terms, encouraging behavior focused on long-term value

creation. The TSR Awards are based on three-year share price performance and also encourage behavior focused on long-term goals, while discouraging behavior focused on short-term risks.

Ÿ

Pay-for-Performance.    Only about 20% to 40% of total target compensation is fixed for NEOs while the remaining total compensation is tied to performance, consistent with the Company’s pay-for-performance philosophy. As scope of responsibility increases, the amount of performance-based pay increases and fixed pay decreases in relation to the level within the Company. The Company’s AIP design, described elsewhere in this Compensation Discussion and Analysis under the heading “Elements of Compensation — 2012 Annual Incentive Plan,” emphasizes overall performance and collaboration among Segments, focuses on metrics that encourage operating performance and earnings per share appreciation, and is tailored to meet the Company’s corporate strategy.

Ÿ

Clawback Policy.    The incentive plan agreements for NEOs and certain other senior executive recipients of RSUs, stock options, and TSR Awards allow the Compensation Committee to claw back certain awards in the case of, among other things, acts of fraud, theft, misappropriation of funds, dishonesty, bad faith or disloyalty.

Ÿ

Required Executive Stock Ownership.    NEOs are required to own Company shares or share equivalents with a value equal to a multiple of their base salary, as discussed elsewhere in this Compensation Discussion and Analysis under the heading “Executive Stock Ownership Guidelines.” We believe this requirement aligns their interests with the interests of the Company’s shareholders and also discourages behavior that is focused only on the short-term.

Ÿ

Prohibition Against Speculating in Company Stock.    The Company has a policy prohibiting employees from speculative trading in and out the Company’s securities, including short sales and leverage transactions, such as puts, calls, and listed and unlisted options.

Our Annual Compensation Cycle

The compensation of our executive officers, including our NEOs, is reviewed in detail by the Compensation Committee every year during the first quarter. This review includes:

Ÿ

Annual performance reviews for the prior year,

Ÿ

Base salary merit increases – normally established in March,

Ÿ

AIP target awards, and

Ÿ

Long-term incentive target awards (including stock options, RSUs, and TSR Awards).

The actual award date of stock options, RSUs and TSR Awards is determined on the date on which the Compensation Committee approves these awards. In recent years, this has occurred at the Compensation Committee’s regularly-scheduled March meeting. TSR Awards reflect a three-year performance period starting on January 1 of the year in which the Compensation Committee approved the TSR Award. RSU, TSR and stock option award recipients receive communication of the award as soon as reasonably practicable after the grant of the award.

interest existed. The Compensation and Personnel Committee will continuehas the sole authority to reviewretain and assess the performance of all NEOs and other senior executives and authorizeterminate consultants, including Pay Governance, with respect to compensation actions it believes are appropriate and commensurate with relevant competitive data, current business performance and the approved compensation programs.

Use of Consultants and matters.



32



External Benchmarking Data

In 2012,2015, as in past years, the Compensation and Personnel Committee looked to competitive market compensation data for companies comparable to the CompanyITT to establish overall policies and programs that address executive compensation, benefits and perquisites.

perquisites in line with its stated pay philosophy.

For 2015 pay decisions for the CEO and CFO, in 2012, the Company createdused a peer group of 1316 companies similarcomparable to ITT in size,terms of revenue, market capitalization and industry in order to better compare executive compensation market practices among

chief executive officers and chief financial officers (the “Representative Peer Group”). The CEO and CFO roles are more easily compared from company to company, taking into account revenue levels between the companies. The 20122015 Representative Peer Group consisted of the following companies.

companies:

Actuant Corporation (ATU)

Flowserve Corporation (FLS)
AMETEK, Inc. (AME)

Harsco Corporation (HSC)
Barnes Group, Inc. (B)Hubbell Incorporated (HUB)
Carlisle Companies Incorporated (CSL)

IDEX Corporation (IEX)
Colfax Corporation (CFX)Nordson Corporation (NDSN)
Crane Co. (CR)

Roper Industries, Inc. (ROP)
EnPro Industries, Inc. (NPO)SPX Corporation (SPW)
Esterline Technologies Corporation (ESL)

Flowserve Corporation (FLS)

Gardner Denver, Inc. (GDI)

Hubbell Incorporated (HUB.B)

IDEX Corporation (IEX)

Robbins & Myers, Inc. (RBN)*

Roper Industries, Inc. (ROP)

SPX Corporation (SPW)

Woodward, Inc. (WWD)

The median revenue of the Representative Peer Group for 2012 was $2.579 billion compared to ITT’s 2012 revenue of $2.228 billion.

The Compensation and Personnel Committee will continue to reviewannually reviews and evaluateevaluates this Representative Peer Group to ensure that it remains appropriate and has determined that these companies will continue to formappropriate. For 2016, SPX Flow, Inc. replaced SPX in the Representative Peer Group, for 2013, with the exception of Robbinsfollowing SPX Flow’s spin-off from SPX Corporation in late 2015.
The Compensation and Myers, Inc, which was acquired in early 2013.

The CompensationPersonnel Committee’s review of external market data also included, as the primary reference for the other NEOs (and as a secondary reference for the CEO and CFO and the primary reference for the other NEOs,CFO), analysis of the Towers Watson Compensation Data Bank (“CDB”) and other compensation survey information provided by the Company’s independent compensation consultant, Pay Governance, LLC (the “Independent Compensation Consultant”).Governance. In particular, the Compensation and Personnel Committee’s analysis used a samplebenchmark group of over 10070 companies listed in Appendix A, from general industrythe Industrials, Materials and Energy sectors that were available in the CDB with annual revenue between $1$1.25 billion and $4$5 billion, and a median revenue of $2.2 billion, which providedin order to provide a representative sample of the Company’s broader market for executive talent. talent (see Appendix A attached).



33



Elements of Compensation
NEO Compensation Elements at a Glance
The Compensation Committee will continue to review and evaluate the companies in this sample annually to ensure that they remain representativedisclosure of the Company’s talent market.

ELEMENTS OF COMPENSATION

our NEO compensation atfor 2015 covers the Company has traditionally consistedfollowing executive officers, including leaders of an annualcertain of our business segments (“Segments”):

Denise L. Ramos, Chief Executive Officer and President;
Thomas M. Scalera, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer;
Aris C. Chicles, Executive Vice President and President, Industrial Process;
Luca Savi, Executive Vice President and President, Motion Technologies; and
Victoria Creamer, Senior Vice President and Chief Human Resource Officer.
The compensation of our executive officers, including our NEOs, is reviewed in detail by the Compensation and Personnel Committee during the first quarter of every year. NEO direct compensation for 2015 consists of a base salary, an annual cash-based incentive in the form of the AIP award, and long-term incentive awards, in the formeach of RSUs, stock options and cash-based TSR awards. Beginning in 2013, the TSR Awards will consist entirely of stock-based compensation.

which is detailed below.
Compensation
Element
FormRationale for Providing

Base Salary

CashBase salary is a competitive fixed pay element tied to role, experience, performance and criticality of skills.
Annual Incentive Plan (AIP) AwardsCashThe Compensation Committee approves base salariesAIP is designed to executives in order to attractreward achievement of the enterprise (company), Segments (where applicable) and retain our executive team with annual salaries that are competitive with the external market. Base salaries also serve as a counter-balance to the significant percentage of total pay that is at risk of depreciation due to stock declines, enhancing compensation stability.

AIP

individual performance. The AIP is structured to reward and emphasize overall enterprise performance and collaboration among the Segments. Its annual financial goals at bothIt uses metrics (adjusted earnings per share, adjusted cash flow, adjusted operating margin and adjusted revenue) that are the Companyfundamental short-term drivers of shareholder value. Each NEO also has 10% of his or her AIP tied to the achievement of individual and Segment level areteam goals.
Long-Term Incentive (LTI) AwardsStock
The long-term incentive plan is designed to reward performance that drives long-term shareholder value through the use of three-year cliff vesting:
● Performance units (50% of LTI mix) provide rewards linked to absolute stock price performance (due to denomination as share units) and can go up or down based on the Board-approved operating plan,two key measures, equally weighted, and meeting the financial goals set out in that plan typically results in a payment equal to 100%aligned with long-term growth:
○ Total Shareholder Return
○ Return on Invested Capital
● RSUs (25% of the target amount.

Long Term

Incentive

Plan

RSUsThe Compensation Committee grants RSUs toLTI mix) link executive compensation to absolute sharestock price performance and strengthen retention value.
● Stock options (25% of LTI mix) only provide value through a three-year cliff vesting schedule.
Stock OptionsThe Compensation Committee grantsif there is stock option awards to link executive compensation to share price appreciation.
TSR Awards
The actual award date of stock options, RSUs and performance units is determined on the date on which the Compensation and Personnel Committee grants TSR Awards to link executive compensation to the Company’s stock performance relative to industry peers overapproves these awards, which is typically in February or March. Performance units reflect a three-year performance period. This plan provides a balance toperiod starting on January 1st of the Company’s annual grants of RSUsyear in which the Compensation and stock options, asPersonnel Committee approved the TSR Award’s value is determined by the Company’s relative, and not absolute, stock performance. It also reinforces the emphasis on long-term stock price appreciation over short-term financial performance.performance unit.

The Compensation Committee believes that these compensation elements work together to provide a reasonable mix of short-term and long-term compensation, fixed and variable compensation, and absolute and relative performance measures to fully align NEO interests with those of the Company’s shareholders. The charts below set forth the compensation mix for our CEO and other NEOs.

LOGO

The Company also provides benefits and limited perquisites to its NEOs that it believes are competitive with the external market for talent. For a more detailed discussion of these benefits and perquisites, see the discussion elsewhere in this Compensation Discussion and Analysis under the heading “Elements of Compensation — Compensation—Benefits and Perquisites.”



34



How the Pay Mix Supports Pay-for-Performance Alignment
The Compensation and Personnel Committee believes that these compensation elements work together to provide a reasonable mix of short-term and long-term compensation and fixed and variable compensation to provide alignment of each NEO’s objectives and rewards with the interests of the Company’s shareholders. As a NEO’s scope of responsibility increases, the amount of performance-based pay increases and fixed pay decreases in relation to the NEO’s level within the Company. The charts below show the mix between fixed and variable compensation and between long term and short term incentives for our CEO and other NEOs.


2012Note:    The information above reflects 2015 base salary, 2015 target AIP award, and 2015 target long-term incentive grant value. Calculations exclude the value of special, long-term incentive grants. Short-term compensation is composed of base salary and target AIP award. Long-term compensation is composed of target long-term incentive grant value. Fixed compensation is composed of base salary. Variable compensation is composed of target AIP award and target long-term incentive grant value.


35



2015 Base Salary Increases

The Compensation Committee approves NEO base salaries annually after referring to external survey data provided by the Independent Compensation Consultant and the NEO’s individual performance.

The Company conducted its annualawarded base salary merit increase processincreases in March 2012.

2012 Annual Merit Increase Process:  At the time of the Spin Transaction, theFebruary 2015.

The Compensation and Personnel Committee reviewed the compensation levels of the NEOs based on the New ITT Corporation. Most current NEOs received salary increases at that timeRepresentative Peer Group and therefore, as set forth in the table below, no additional increases wereexternal survey data provided in March 2012. Mr. Savi’s compensation is evaluated against similarly situated European executives and has a different weighting of fixed and variable compensation than other NEOs.by Pay Governance. Based on the Compensation and Personnel Committee’s targeted pay positioning, the evaluation of each NEO’s performance, and the external market data on competitive pay levels

provided by the Independent Compensation Consultant,Pay Governance, the Compensation and Personnel Committee approved the following 20122015 NEO salaries, effective March 8, 2012:

NEO  Previous Annual Base
Salary
  Current Annual
Base Salary

Denise L. Ramos

  $850,000  $850,000

Aris C. Chicles

  $420,000  $420,000

Thomas M. Scalera

  $308,000  $400,000

Robert J. Pagano, Jr.

  $400,000  $400,000

Luca Savi

  $521,500

(380,000 EUR at

March 2012

exchange rate)

  $521,500

(380,000 EUR at
March 2012
exchange rate)

Thomas F. Korber

  $310,000  N/A

William E. Taylor

  $318,000  N/A

2012February 28, 2015:

Named Executive Officer2014 Annual Base Salary2015 Annual Base SalaryChange
Denise L. Ramos $950,000
 $1,000,000
5%
Thomas M. Scalera 430,000
 475,000
10%
Aris C. Chicles 430,000
 438,500
2%
Luca Savi(1)
 452,880
 461,760
2%
Victoria Creamer(2)
Not Applicable  350,000
Not Applicable
(1)Mr. Savi is employed by ITT Italia s.r.l. and is paid in Euros. His 2014 annual base salary of €408,000 and his 2015 annual base salary of €416,000 were converted to U.S. dollars using the 2015 average exchange rate of 1.11.
(2)Ms. Creamer joined ITT in February 2015.
2015 Annual Incentive Plan

The

For 2015, AIP is an elementpayouts averaged 119% of NEO compensation that rewards annualtarget for the NEOs, reflecting strong net operating performanceproductivity and earnings appreciation.effective cost containment in a challenging macroeconomic environment. The Company’s AIP provides for an annual cash payment to participating executives established as a target percentage of base salary. In setting AIP awards, the Compensation and Personnel Committee approves target AIP awards after careful consideration of external data, individual roles and responsibilities and individual performance. Any
The Company pays for AIP paymentperformance that demonstrates substantial achievement of plan goals. We established strong incentives and set aggressive goals for all financial metrics.
Our most senior executive officers’ eligibility to receive AIP awards is first conditioned upon the productattainment of the annual base salary rate multiplieda threshold performance metric established by the Compensation and Personnel Committee, which for 2015 was the achievement of an EBITDA target base salary percentage multiplied byof 50% of prior year’s EBITDA. This threshold is established in order to qualify bonus payments as performance-based compensation deductible under Section 162(m). Upon satisfaction of this performance threshold, the AIP annual performance factor based on the approved metrics. The Compensation and Personnel Committee may approveexercise negative discretionary adjustmentsdiscretion to determine AIP payments for these individuals in accordance with respectthe performance criteria applied to NEOs.

all other AIP participants. These AIP performance metrics are described below under the heading “2015 AIP Performance Metrics Selection Process

The 2012and Weight.” In 2015, for each NEO, they included four financial metrics and an individual component. In 2015, the Compensation and Personnel Committee exercised negative discretion to subject the most senior executive officers to the same performance criteria as all other AIP approach was designedparticipants and to consider internal business achievements.each officer’s performance against his or her individual goals.

Under these performance criteria, in order to achieve an AIP payout, the Company must achieve a certain threshold for each of the four financial metrics in order for each performance component to be considered in the calculation. Performance below the threshold performance level results in a zero payout for that particular performance component.
The formula to determine each NEO’s AIP total potential payment is as follows:
2015 AIP Potential Payout =
(Base Salary) x (Target Award Percentage) x (AIP Performance Factor)
Both the individual performance components of the AIP and the overall AIP award are capped at 200%. The Compensation and Personnel Committee studied past and projected earnings and other performance measures of comparable multi-industry peersmaintains the right to exercise negative discretion when determining AIP awards, but did not exercise further negative discretion in the CDB. case of our NEOs, when determining the 2015 AIP awards under the criteria described below.


36



2015 AIP Awards Paid in 2016
The 2015 AIP awards that were paid in March 2016 are as follows:
Named Executive Officer2015 Target AIP Awards as Percentage of Base Salary2015 Target AIP Awards2015 AIP Awards (Paid in First Quarter 2016)2015 AIP Awards as Percentage of Target (Paid in First Quarter 2016)
Denise L. Ramos100% $1,000,000
 $1,162,000
116%
Thomas M. Scalera75% 356,250
 417,525
117%
Aris C. Chicles75% 328,875
 348,608
106%
Luca Savi(1)
65% 300,144
 432,207
144%
Victoria Creamer60% 210,000
 235,620
112%
(1)Mr. Savi is employed by ITT Italia s.r.l. and his 2015 AIP Target and 2015 AIP award paid have been converted from Euro (€) to U.S dollars using the 2015 average exchange rate of 1.11.
2015 AIP Performance Metrics and Weight
Based on its 2012the Company’s 2015 business objectives, and an analysis of performance measures used among these peer companies in their annual incentive plans, the Compensation and Personnel Committee identified fourfive performance metrics for the AIP for the 20122015 performance year. The selectedfollowing table shows the weighting assigned to each NEO for each AIP performance metric:
Named Executive OfficerAdjusted Earnings per ShareAdjusted ITT Cash FlowAdjusted ITT Operating MarginAdjusted ITT RevenueAdjusted Segment Free Cash Flow
Adjusted Segment Operating Margin 
Adjusted Segment RevenueIndividual Component
Denise L. Ramos30%25%25%10%10%
Thomas M. Scalera30%25%25%10%10%
Aris C. Chicles30%25%25%10%10%
Luca Savi30%25%25%10%10%
Victoria Creamer30%25%25%10%10%
As permitted by the ITT Annual Incentive Plan for Executive Officers, the Compensation and Personnel Committee may exclude the impact of acquisitions, dispositions and other special items in computing AIP awards. The four financial performance metrics were:

applicable to each NEO are therefore non-GAAP financial measures and should not be considered a substitute for measures determined in accordance with GAAP. These non-GAAP financial measures may not be comparable to similar measures reported by other companies. Descriptions of each of the performance metrics are as follows:
1.
MetricReason for SelectionDetails
Adjusted Earnings per Share:   Adjusted EPS is a primaryShareImportant measure of the value provided to shareholders. Adjusted EPS reflectsshareholdersReflects the adjusted non-GAAP earnings per share from continuing operations of the Company divided by the number of fully-diluted shares outstanding. Adjustments such as acquisitions and divestitures, whichCompany. Special items may include, but are not budgeted for, will affect this measure. This metric is commonly referenced by investment analystslimited to, asbestos-related costs, transformation, realignment and repositioning costs, restructuring costs and asset impairment charges, unbudgeted acquisition-related expenses, income tax settlements or adjustments and other unusual or infrequent non-operating items. Special items represent charges or credits on an after-tax basis that impact current results, but may not be related to the financial press as a measure of the company’s growth potentialCompany’s ongoing operations and ability to deliver shareholder value.performance.

2.

Adjusted Cash Flow and Adjusted Segment Free Cash Flow:   The Company has identified Adjusted Free Cash Flow as an important

Important measure of how the Company converts its net earnings into deployable cash. cashAt the corporate level, Adjusted Free Cash Flow is a non-GAAP measurement defined as net cash provided by operating activities less capital expenditures, cash payments for transformation costs, repositioning costs, net asbestos cash flows and other significant items that impact current results that management believes are not related to ongoing operations and performance. At the Segment level, the Company uses the non-GAAP measure Adjusted OperatingSegment Free Cash Flow. Adjusted OperatingSegment Free Cash Flow is defined as

Segment level net cash flow from operating activities, less capital expenditures and adjusted for special items.
Adjusted Operating Cash Flow should not be considered a substitute for cash flow data prepared in accordance with GAAP. The Company’s definition of Adjusted Operating Cash Flow may not be comparable to similar measures utilized by other companies. Management believes that Adjusted Free Cash Flow and Adjusted Operating Cash Flow are important measures of performance and are utilized as a measure of the Company’s ability to generate cash.

3.Adjusted EBIT Margin and Adjusted Segment Operating Margin:   Adjusted EBIT Margin and Adjusted Segment Operating Margin have been utilized at the corporate and Segment level, respectively, since the completion of the Spin Transaction in order to emphasizeEmphasizes the importance of maintaining healthy margins. marginsAdjusted EBITOperating Margin is defined as the ratio of adjusted segment operating income, less corporate expenses, over adjusted revenue. Adjusted Segment Operating Margin is defined as the ratio of adjusted segment operating income over adjusted revenue. Adjustments would include, but are not limited to, the impact of unbudgeted acquisitions and divestitures and special items.



37



4.
MetricReason for SelectionDetails
Adjusted Revenue Growth:and Adjusted Segment Revenue Growth reflectsReflects the Company’s emphasis on growth. growthAdjusted Revenue Growth is defined as reported GAAP revenue excluding the estimated impact of foreign currency fluctuations and contributionsthe impact from unbudgeted acquisitions and divestitures. The Company’s definition ofdivestitures made in the last 12 months. Adjusted Segment Revenue is Adjusted Revenue, Growth may not be comparablecalculated at the segment level.
Individual ComponentProvides focus on supporting enterprise initiatives that will create growth and increase shareholder valueEach NEO establishes several personal or team goals related to similar measures utilized by other companies. Revenue generated outsideCompany initiatives or Segment initiatives that are aligned with the strategy of the United States is converted to US dollars based onbusiness and the local currency exchange rate each month. Adjusted revenue should not be consideredgoals of the CEO. For 2015, four areas that were established at the start of the performance period were: (1) building a substitute for revenue data prepared in accordancehigh performing culture and enhancing the strength of the ITT leadership team, (2) driving operational execution and lean manufacturing with GAAP.continuous process improvement, (3) targeting research and development investment at key initiatives and (4) cultivating and pursuing acquisition opportunities. The Compensation and Personnel Committee and the Chief Executive Officer evaluate achievement of these goals and assign payout percentages.

For our NEOs at the corporate level, Ms. Ramos, Messrs. Chicles, Scalera,

AIP 2015 Performance Targets and formerly, Mr. Korber, incentive compensation is based on consolidatedResults
Corporate Performance Targets: The Adjusted Earnings per Share,EPS, Adjusted Free Cash Flow, Adjusted EBIT Margin, and Adjusted Revenue Growth. For Mr. Savi, Mr. Pagano and, formerly, Mr. Taylor, who head or headed certain of our Segments, incentive compensation is based on Adjusted Earnings Per Share, Adjusted Operating Cash Flow, Adjusted Operating Margin and Adjusted Revenue Growth at their Segments.

2012 AIP Performance Metrics and Weights

The Compensation Committee established 2012 AIP performance targets for the NEOs after considering recommendations from management and the Independent Compensation Consultant, the Company’s business goals, and input from shareholders. Successful attainment of both qualitative factors and quantitative factors are achievable only if the enterprise and the individual NEO perform at levels established by the Compensation Committee. As permitted by the ITT Annual Incentive Plan for Executive Officers, the Compensation Committee may exclude the impact of acquisitions, dispositions and other special items in computing AIP payments.

Internal performance metrics were weighted to represent operational goals. In order to encourage focus on total Company performance, rather than solely Segment performance, the EPS performance target was 40% of the overall performance metrics for the Company’s 2012 AIP for all NEOs. For corporate-level executives, which include Ms. Ramos and Messrs. Chicles, Scalera, and Korber, consolidated Adjusted Free Cash Flow was weighted in the Company’s 2012 AIP at 30% and consolidated Adjusted Operating Margin and consolidated Adjusted Revenue Growth were each weighted at 15%. For Segment-level executives, which include Messrs. Pagano, Savi and Taylor, the remaining 60% of the AIP weight was distributed between three Segment-specific measures: Adjusted Segment Operating Cash Flow (30%), Adjusted Segment Revenue Growth (15%), and Adjusted Segment Operating Margin (15%). Adjusted Segment Operating Cash Flow was given a larger AIP weight than Adjusted Segment Revenue or Adjusted Segment Operating Margin because the Compensation Committee considered strong Adjusted Segment Operating Cash Flow to be an important measure in converting operating income into deployable cash.

The Company pays for AIP performance that demonstrates substantial achievement of plan goals. We established strong incentives for revenue performance and set aggressive goals for other metrics. In order to achieve an AIP payout, each metric must meet a certain threshold for that component to be considered in the calculation. Performance below the threshold performance level results in a zero payout for that component.

The formula to determine each NEO’s AIP total potential payment (subject to negative Compensation Committee discretion) is as follows:

2012 AIP Potential Payout =

(Base Salary) x (Target Award Percentage) x (AIP Performance Factor)

Both the individual performance components of the AIP and the overall AIP Award are capped at 200%. Results are interpolated between points.

2012 Target AIP Award Percentage of Base Salary and Weighting of AIP Performance Components

Named Executive
Officer
 

2012
Target
Award

Percentage

of Base
Salary

  

Adjusted
Earnings
per Share

(a)

  

Consolidated

Adjusted
Free Cash
Flow

(b)

  

Adjusted
EBIT
Margin
(c)

  

Consolidated
Adjusted
Revenue
Growth

(d)

  Adjusted
Segment
Operating
Cash Flow
(e)
  

Adjusted
Segment
Operating
Margin

(f)

  

Adjusted
Segment
Revenue
Growth

(g)

 Total
Enterprise
Performance

Denise L. Ramos

  100  40  30  15  15           a+b+c+d

Aris C. Chicles

  75  40  30  15  15           a+b+c+d

Thomas M. Scalera

  75  40  30  15  15           a+b+c+d

Robert J. Pagano, Jr.

  50  40              30  15 15% a+e+f+g

Luca Savi

  45  40              30  15 15% a+e+f+g

Thomas F. Korber

  50  40  30  15  15           a+b+c+d

William E. Taylor

  45  40              30  15 15% a+e+f+g

Calculation of AIP 2012 Performance

Company Performance Targets:    The Adjusted EPS, Free Cash Flow, Operating Margin and Revenue Growth targets were based on the 2012 businessCompany’s 2015 operating plan. The Compensation and Personnel Committee reviewed the businessoperating plan with corporate management to ensure that the targets were appropriateappropriate. The Compensation and required significant effort to achieve. The CompensationPersonnel Committee determined that the achievement of the combination of financial goals would be challenging and reflect strong performance in the eyes of shareholders.performance. The table below sets forth the weighting, target and actual amountsresults for each 20122015 AIP financial performance target.

Metric  Weighting   2012 Target   2012 Results 

Adjusted Earnings Per Share

   40%    $1.65    $1.67  

Adjusted Free Cash Flow

   30%    $124.5M    $133.5M  

Adjusted EBIT Margin

   15%     11%     11%  

Adjusted Revenue Growth

   15%    $2,209.8M    $2,241.9M  

Segmentmetric at the corporate level.

Corporate Financial Performance Targets:    For Messrs. Pagano and Savi, the Compensation Committee set the Adjusted Segment Operating Cash Flow, Adjusted Segment Operating Margin, and Adjusted Segment Revenue GrowthTargets
Metric
Threshold
(50%)
Target
(100%)
Maximum
(200%)
2015 Results2015 Payout
Adjusted Earnings per Share$2.34$2.60$2.99$2.5488.4%
Adjusted ITT Cash Flow$145M$170M$204M$183M137.9%
Adjusted ITT Operating Margin11.4%12.7%14.6%13.0%116.9%
Adjusted ITT Revenue$2,330M$2,587M$2,848M$2,512M85.4%
The financial performance targets for the full 12-month period at levels that are consistent with the Company’s long-term CDB targetsMr. Chicles (Industrial Process) and are designed to meet shareholder expectations. The Compensation Committee considers

these targets toMr. Savi (Motion Technologies) reflect strong performance. their respective Segments.

Segment Financial Performance Targets
Metric
Threshold
(50%)
Target
(100%)
Maximum
(200%)
2015 Results2015 Payout
Adjusted Segment Operating Margin (Industrial Process)11.7%13.0%15.0%13.0%100.0%
Adjusted Segment Operating Margin (Motion Technologies)16.3%18.1%20.8%18.8%125.9%
Adjusted Segment Revenue (Industrial Process)$1,062M$1,180M$1,298M$1,141M83.6%
Adjusted Segment Revenue (Motion Technologies)$675M$750M$825M$757M109.5%
The Company does not report on the Adjusted Segment financial results used for Segment AIP calculations,Free Cash Flow metric, as it believes that doing sodisclosing this specific target would causeresult in competitive harm to the Company.

2012 Company in that it may inform competitors and other parties as to the basis for future business decisions and provide insights into the Company’s confidential planning process and strategies.



38



AIP Awards PaidIndividual Component Considerations
Each NEO has 10% of their AIP bonus target based on the individual component, which rewards for achievement of their individual and team goals. The Compensation and Personal Committee considered the following achievements when determining the individual component payout of each NEO. The considerations for the CEO are described below under “CEO Compensation Decisions.”
Thomas M. Scalera, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer:
Provided leadership of Merger and Acquisition and Strategy function, delivering two successful acquisitions and one divestiture in 2013

The 2012 AIP Awards that will be paid2015;

Leveraged capabilities of the ITT Management System team to increase operational excellence within the Value Centers;
Continued leadership and advancement in 2013 are as follows:

Named Executive

Officers

  Target
2012 AIP
Awards ($)
   2012
AIP
Awards ($)
   AIP
2012 Awards
as Percentage
of Target  (%)
 

Denise L. Ramos

  $850,000    $978,350     115.1%

Aris C. Chicles

  $315,000    $362,565     115.1%

Thomas M. Scalera

  $300,000    $345,300     115.1%

Robert J. Pagano, Jr.

  $200,000    $213,000     106.5%

Luca Savi

  $219,219    $217,684     99.3%

Thomas F. Korber

  $142,083    $163,537     115.1

William E. Taylor

  $150,300    $     0%

2012overall management of asbestos-related matters; and

Delivered strong financial results with a focus on operational and corporate efficiency gains.
Aris C. Chicles, Executive Vice President and President, Industrial Process:
Completed shift to new organization design focused on three business units while creating strong product management approach;
Executed challenging restructuring plan and footprint optimization;
Delivered turnaround of Bornemann through integration, creation of growth strategy and leadership changes; and
Delivered strong adjusted operating income margins (+230 bps) during a challenging economic year in oil and gas.
Luca Savi, Executive Vice President and President Motion Technologies:
Delivered market share gains across all regions;
Quickly recovered from operational disruption in Koni, while achieving solid financial results;
Drove successful acquisition of Wolverine Advanced Materials; and
Delivered strong operating margins in China.
Victoria Creamer, Senior Vice President and Chief Human Resource Officer:
Continued transformation of Human Resources function through re-alignment of organization;
Re-designed and simplified the U.S. benefits approach through shifting to a private exchange;
Deployed consistent performance management approach for professional roles with a focus on goals and competencies; and
Executed resource strategies supporting lean transformation and optimization of work locations.


39



2015 Long-Term Incentive Compensation

In 2015, long-term incentives for our NEOs were allocated as follows:
50% was granted in performance units calculated based on the closing stock price on the grant date less the estimated dividend yield during the 3-year performance period;
25% was granted in RSUs calculated based on the closing stock price on grant date; and
25% was granted in stock options calculated using a valuation model consistent with accounting expense.
The following table shows the target value of the long-term incentive award grants made to NEOs in February 2015 as part of the Company’s regular annual compensation process. These long-term incentive values were determined, taking into account base pay and annual incentive values, in developing market competitive total compensation levels and an appropriate mix of fixed versus variable and short-term versus long-term incentives. These values also considered each NEO’s role, potential long-term contribution, performance, experience and skills.
Named Executive OfficerPerformance Unit Awards (Target Award)RSUsStock  Options
Total(1)
Denise L. Ramos $2,125,000
 $1,062,500
 $1,062,500
 $4,250,000
Thomas M. Scalera 400,000
 200,000
 200,000
 800,000
Aris C. Chicles 375,000
 187,500
 187,500
 750,000
Luca Savi(2)
 162,500
 81,250
 81,250
 325,000
Victoria Creamer 175,000
 87,500
 87,500
 350,000
(1)The values in this table differ slightly from the values reported in the Summary Compensation Table and the Grants of Plan-Based Awards in 2015 table, each of which present the value recorded for accounting purposes.
(2)Mr. Savi is employed by ITT Italia s.r.l. and his compensation, including long-term incentive awards, is based on benchmark data and pay practices for similar roles in Italy.
Special Grants
In addition to annual long-term incentive awards, the Compensation and Personnel Committee may award special grants in the form of performance units, RSUs or stock options. These grants are used to attract new senior executives to ITT, provide additional retention incentive or reward extraordinary performance. Three NEOs received the following special grants during 2015, which are not reflected in the table above:
Mr. Scalera received a special grant of $200,000 in RSUs, which vest 100% three years after the grant date. The award was granted to recognize Mr. Scalera’s performance as CFO and also for his leadership managing the strategy and information technology functions.
Mr. Savi received a special grant of $400,000 in RSUs, which vest 100% three years after the grant date. The award was granted to recognize Mr. Savi’s performance in driving continued strong financial results at Motion Technologies and to provide additional retention incentive.
Ms. Creamer received a special grant of 2,500 RSUs ($103,800 at grant date), which vest 100% three years after grant date, pursuant to the terms of her employment offer letter to replace forfeited stock awards from her previous employer and to induce her to join ITT.
The Company’s long-term incentive awards component for senior executives hastake a portfolio approach by using three subcomponents,distinct vehicles, each addressing long-term shareholder value alignment in different ways. The Compensation and Personnel Committee believes these three types of which directly ties long-term compensation to long-term value creation andawards in combination provide strong shareholder return:

Ÿ

RSU Awards.    In 2010, the Compensation Committee awarded restricted stock awards. Beginning in 2011, and continuing in 2012, the Compensation Committee elected to award RSUs, which are settled in shares upon vesting. The Compensation Committee decided to award RSUs rather than restricted stock in 2011 because RSU awards provide consistent tax treatment for domestic and international employees. RSUs granted to international employees are settled in cash rather than shares, again for local income tax purposes. RSUs provide the same economic risk or reward as restricted stock, but recipients do not have voting rights and do not receive cash dividends during the restriction period. Dividend equivalents are accrued and paid in cash upon vesting of the RSUs.

Ÿ

Non-qualified stock option awards.    These awards have a 10-year term and a strike price equal to the closing price of the Company’s stock on the grant date. In the event of retirement after a grant, retiring employees have until the earlier of five years from their retirement date or the original expiration date to exercise their non-qualified stock options.

Ÿ

TSR Awards.    These awards are target cash awards that directly link the Company’s three-year TSR performance to the performance of the S&P 400 Mid-Cap Capital Goods Index, of which ITT is a member, on a relative basis.

The 2012 Long-Term Incentive Program Awards were allocated as follows: one-third of the value was granted in RSUs calculated at grant date fair value; one-third was granted in non-qualified stock options calculated at the grant date fair value of the non-qualified options; and one-third was granted in TSR Awards calculated at target payment amount.

The following table describes the RSU awards, non-qualified stock option awards, and TSR Awards made to NEOs in March 2012. The TSR Award amounts listed reflect the cash targetalignment, retention value, and the opportunity to leverage awards up and down consistent with absolute and relative stock optionprice performance, as well as Company performance over the long term.

Performance Unit Awards.  Performance units are settled in shares after a three-year performance vesting period, with performance tied equally to the Company’s Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) and RSU awards reflect the Company’s three-year total shareholder return (TSR) performance relative to the performance of the S&P 400 Capital Goods Index, of which ITT is a member.
ROIC was selected as a metric by the Committee because it drives efficient and disciplined deployment of capital and is a strong driver of shareholder value.
Relative TSR was selected as a metric to ensure executive compensation is aligned with shareholder value creation.
The number of underlying options or shares granted.

Named Executive Officer  

RSU

(# of
Units)

   

Non-Qualified Stock
Option Award

(# of Options)

   TSR
(Target Cash
Award) ($)
 

Denise L. Ramos

   41,009     136,100    $935,000  

Aris C. Chicles

   9,211     30,570    $210,000  

Thomas M. Scalera

   8,772     29,115    $200,000  

Robert J. Pagano, Jr.

   5,848     19,410    $133,300  

Luca Savi

   4,006     13,295    $91,300  

Thomas F. Korber

   5,336     17,710    $121,700  

William E. Taylor

   4,883     16,210    $111,300  

delivered can range from zero to 200% of the units initially awarded, depending on performance, and delivery generally requires employment throughout the three-year performance period. Performance units therefore provide alignment with absolute stock performance, relative stock performance, Company performance, and potential retention value.



40



There are up to three outstanding performance unit awards at any time. No dividend equivalents are accrued on unvested performance units.
Measuring TSR performance:
TSR performance is measured for all companies in the index by comparing the average closing stock price for the month of December prior to the start of the three-year performance cycle, to the average closing stock price for the month of December that concludes the three-year performance cycle, including adjustments for reinvested dividends and extraordinary payments.
Vesting at the end of the applicable three-year performance period is based on the Company’s TSR performance ranked against the TSR performance of the other companies within the index. The amount vested, if any, is established on a straight-line basis between the 35th and 80th percentile of performance.
If Company’s Relative Total Shareholder Return Performance is:
Payout Factor for TSR Component of
Performance Unit Award
at the 80th percentile or greater200%
at the 50th percentile100%
at the 35th percentile50%
less than the 35th percentile0%
Measuring ROIC performance:
ROIC is defined as: after-tax earnings before interest, taxes and amortization (EBITA), excluding any special items, divided by total assets (excluding asbestos receivable), less non-interest bearing current liabilities. Special items must be approved by the Committee and they represent significant charges or credits that impact results, but may not be related to the Company’s ongoing operations and performance.
In 2015, the Company established threshold, target and maximum ROIC performance targets for the three-year performance period from 2015 through 2017.
2015 ROIC AwardPerformance TargetsPayout*
Maximum13.0%200%
Target12.0%100%
Threshold11.0%50%
* Payouts for performance between threshold and maximum are interpolated
The ROIC performance targets are designed to be appropriately challenging, and there is a risk that the performance units will not vest or will vest at less than 100% of the target amount. The level of performance required to attain a threshold payout is generally set at a level of performance where the Compensation and Personnel Committee believes that a significantly reduced incentive payment is appropriate and below which no payout is appropriate. The level of performance to attain the target payout is designed to be reasonably challenging. The level of performance to attain a maximum payout is generally set at a level of performance that the Compensation and Personnel Committee deems exceptional.
Vesting, if any, generally occurs following the end of the applicable three-year performance period and is based on the ROIC achieved during the final year of the performance period.
Restricted Stock Units ComponentUnits.

    RSUs are settled in shares after a three-year vesting period and provide alignment with stock performance and retention value. Grants of RSUs provide NEOs with stock ownership of unrestricted shares after the restrictions lapse. NEOs receive RSU awards because, in the judgment of the Compensation and Personnel Committee and based on management recommendations, these individuals are in positions most likely to influence the achievement of the Company’s long-term value creation goals and to create shareholder value over time. The Compensation and Personnel Committee reviews all grants of RSUs for executive officers prior to the award, including awards based on performance, retention-based awards and awards contemplated for new employees as part of employment offers. The CEO has the authority to grant RSUs to other employees in certain situations, and up to certain pre-approved limits.situations. These grants are reviewed by the Compensation and Personnel Committee at its next scheduled meeting.

Key elements of RSUs do not grant dividend or voting rights to the 2012 RSU program wereholder over the following.

Ÿ

RSUs do not grant dividend or voting rights to the holder over the vesting period; dividend equivalents are accrued and paid on the vesting date.

Ÿ

RSUs are generally subject to a three-year restriction period.

Ÿ

If an acceleration event occurs (as described under the heading “Potential Post-Employment Compensation — Change of Control Arrangements”) the RSUs vest in full.

Ÿ

If an employee dies or becomes disabled, the RSUs vest in full.

Ÿ

If an employee leaves the Company prior to vesting, whether through resignation or termination for cause, the RSUs are forfeited.

Ÿ

If an employee retires or is terminated other than for cause, a pro-rata portion of the RSU award vests.

vesting period, however, dividend equivalents are accrued and paid after vesting. In certain cases, such as for new hires or to facilitate retention, selected employees may receive RSUs subject to different vesting terms as determined byterms.



41



Stock Options.  Stock options provide the Compensation Committee.

Non-Qualified Stock Options Component

Non-qualified stock options permit option holdersright to buy CompanyITT stock in the future at a price equal to the stock’s closing value on the date of the option was granted,grant, which is the stock option exercise price. Stock options have a 10-year term and a three-year vesting period before becoming exercisable and provide alignment with stock price growth. Stock option awards to employees other than executive officers generally vest one-third per year over the three years. Non-qualified stock option terms were selected after the Compensation and Personnel Committee’s review and assessment of the CDBmarket practices and consideration of terms best suited to the Company.

For each of our NEOs, non-qualified stock options do not vest until three years after the award date. This delayed vesting is referred to as “three-year cliff vesting.” This vesting schedule prohibits early option exercises, and focuses senior executives on the Company’s long-term value creation goals.

In 2012,2015, the fair value of stock options granted under the employee stock option program was calculated using a binomial lattice valuation model, a financial model used to determine the value of stock options. This model applies a binomial approach to discrete time periods to value the option to purchase a share of stock. The Compensation Committee considered this a preferred model, versus the Black-Scholes model, since the model can incorporate multiple and variable assumptions over time, including assumptions such as employee exercise patterns, stock price volatility and changes in dividends.

Key elements of the non-qualified stock options granted to NEOs in 2012 are2015 were as follows.

follows:
Exercise Price:
Ÿ

Exercise Price:

¡

The option exercise price of stock options awarded is the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”)NYSE closing price of the Company’s common stock on the date the award is approved by the Compensation and Personnel Committee.

¡

ForStock options granted to new executives the optionhave an exercise price of approved stock option awards isequal to the closing price on the grant date, generally during the first of the month followingof employment.

¡

The Omnibus Incentive2011 Plan prohibits the repricing of, or exchange of, stock options and stock appreciation rights that are priced below the prevailing market price with lower-priced stock options or stock appreciation rights without shareholder approval, except in the event of an equity restructuring.

Vesting Schedule:
Ÿ

Vesting Schedule:

¡

Three-year cliff vesting is required for executives at the level of senior vice president or above, while stock options vest in one-third cumulative annual installments for executives below the senior vice president level.

above.

¡

OptionsStock options cannot be exercised prior to vesting.

Option Term and Exercise Period:
¡

If an acceleration event occurs (as described under the heading “Compensation Tables – Change of Control Arrangements”) the stock option award vests in full.

Ÿ

Option Term and Exercise Period:

¡

OptionsStock options awarded between 2005 and 2009 expire seven years after the grant date. OptionsStock options awarded before 2005 or after 2009 expire ten10 years after the grant date.

¡

There may be adjustments to the post-employment exercise period of ana stock option grant if an employee’s tenure with the Company is terminated due to death, disability, retirement or termination by the Company other than for cause, provided that any post-employment exercise period cannot exceed the original expiration date of the stock option.

Ÿ

Termination Provisions:

¡

If an employee

2013 Performance Unit Award Payout
In 2013, ITT granted performance unit awards to certain executives, including each of the NEOs except for Ms. Creamer. The payout of the 2013 performance unit is terminated for cause, or voluntarily terminates employment without an acceleration event, vested and unvested portions of the options expire on the date of termination.

¡

If an employee dies or becomes permanently disabled, all unvested options vest in full.

¡

If the employee is terminated for a reason other than for cause or retires, a pro-rata portion of the stock options vest.

¡

If employment is terminated due to an acceleration event or because the option holder believes in good faith that he or she would be unable to discharge his or her duties effectively after the acceleration event, the option expires on the earlier of the date seven months after the acceleration event or the normal expiration date.

TSR Awards Component

TSR Awards are variable cash payments, based equally on the Company’s stock price appreciationTSR performance relative to thatthe performance of a pre-approved group of 43 industry peer companies, the S&P Mid-Cap400 Capital Goods Index (the “TSR Performance Index”)and the Company’s ROIC relative to certain performance targets, each over athe three-year performance cycle. period.

2013-2015 TSR Results: During the three-year performance period, ITT’s TSR was at the 76th percentile of the index of companies, which resulted in a payout that was 186% of target.
2013-2015 ROIC Results: ITT’s ROIC performance was 11.44%, which resulted in a payout of 144% of target. ITT’s ROIC expanded 144 basis points over the three years and exceeded the 2015 peer group median by 174 basis points.
2013 ROIC AwardPerformance TargetsPayout*
Maximum12.0%200%
Target11.0%100%
Threshold10.0%50%
* Payouts for performance between threshold and maximum are interpolated


42



The TSR Performance Index was chosenoverall payout of 165% is based on companies with similar revenue and market capitalization as the Company. The Compensation Committee feels that the companies in the TSR Performance Index are those with which we compete for capital. The Compensation Committee evaluates the TSR Performance Index at least every two years to ensure that it remains appropriate and relevant. The Compensation Committee, at its discretion, determines the size and frequency of TSR Awards, performance measures and performance goals, in addition to performance periods

Determining TSR Awards.    In determining the sizeequal weighting of the TSR Awards,payout (186%) and the Compensation Committee considers comparative data provided by the Independent Compensation Consultant, as well as the individual’s role, potential contribution to the company’s long-term goals and performance. Key elements of the TSR Awards include the following:

ROIC payout (144%):
Name
2013
Performance Units Granted
(at target)
2013
Payout Factor
2013
Performance Units Vested
Denise L. Ramos54,871165%90,537
Thomas M. Scalera11,972165%19,754
Aris C. Chicles12,324165%20,335
Luca Savi5,360165%8,844
Victoria Creamer(1)
Not ApplicableNot ApplicableNot Applicable
Ÿ

The Company’s performance is measured by comparing the Company’s average closing stock price for the month of December prior to the start of the TSR Award three-year performance cycle, to the Company’s average closing stock price for the month of December that concludes the three-year performance cycle, including adjustments for dividends and extraordinary payments.

Ÿ

Payment, if any, of cash awards generally are made following the end of the applicable three-year performance period and are based on the Company’s performance measured against the TSR performance of the TSR Performance Index. There are up to three outstanding TSR Awards at any time. As a result of the Spin Transaction and the previously disclosed treatment of outstanding TSR Awards, only the 2012 grant was outstanding as of December 31, 2012.

Ÿ

If a participant’s employment terminates before the end of the three-year performance period, the award is forfeited except in two cases: 1) if a participant dies or becomes disabled, the TSR Award vests in full and payment, if any, is made according to its original terms (vesting in full in the case of death or disability reflects the inability of the participant to control the triggering event and is consistent with benefit plan provisions related to death and disability); and 2) if a participant retires or is terminated by the Company other than for cause, a pro-rated payout, if any, is provided based on the number of full months of employment during the measurement period divided by 36 months (the term of the three-year TSR). This pro-rated payout, if any, is provided because it reflects the participant’s service during the pro-rated period.

Ÿ

Subject to the provisions of Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code, in the event of an acceleration event in a change of control (described elsewhere in this Proxy Statement under the heading “Potential Post-Employment Compensation — Change in Control Arrangements”), a pro-rated portion of outstanding awards is paid through the date of the change of control based on actual performance and the balance of each award is paid at target (100%).

Ÿ

Performance goals for the applicable TSR performance period are established in writing no later than 90 days after the beginning of the applicable performance period.

Performance Goals and Payments for the TSR Awards.    Individual targets for the NEOs for the 2012-2014 performance period (the “2012-14 TSR Award Period”) used to determine TSR Awards are provided in the “Grants of Plan Based Awards in 2012” table under the heading “Compensation Tables.” Payouts, if any, are based on a non discretionary formula and interpolated for values

between the 35th and 80th percentile of performance. The Compensation Committee felt these breakpoints were properly motivational and rewarded the desired behavior.

If Company’s Total Shareholder Return Rank

Against the Companies that Comprise the

TSR Performance Index is

(1)

Payout Factor

(% of Target TSR
Award)

less than the 35th percentile

0

at the 35th percentile

50

at the 50th percentile

100

at the 80th percentile or more

200Ms. Creamer joined ITT in 2015.

Benefits and Perquisites

All of the NEOs, except for Mr. Savi who is employed by ITT Italia s.r.l., are eligible to participate in the Company’s broad-based U.S. employee benefits program. The program includes a retirement savings plan that includesthe ITT Retirement Savings Plan, which provides before-tax and after-tax savings features, group medical and dental coverage, group life insurance, group accidental death and dismemberment insurance and other benefit plans. These other benefit plans include short-term disability insurance and a flexible spending account plan. Prior to the Spin Transaction,spin-off of our defense and water businesses on October 31, 2011 to establish a new diversified global, multi-industrial company (the “Spin Transaction”), employees also participated in a pension program.

All of the NEOs, except for Mr. Savi, together with most of the Company’s other salaried employees who work in the United States, participate in the ITT Retirement Savings Plan, for Salaried Employees, a tax-qualified savings plan, which allows employees to contribute to the plan on a before-tax basis and/or on an after-tax basis. The Company makes a core contribution of three3% or four percent4% of pay to the plan for all eligible employees, and matches 50% of employee contributions, up to six percent6% of pay. The core contribution is three percent3% for employees whose age plus service is less than 50, and four percent4% for employees whose age plus service is at least 50. In addition, employees who were participating in the ITT Salaried Retirement Plan at the time it was frozen, as described below, and whose age and service iswas at least 60 at that time, may be eligible for up to five years of transition employer contributions following the Spin Transaction. Prior to the Spin Transaction, the floor contribution in the ITT Salaried Investment and Savings Plan was one half of one percent0.5% and all contributions were based on base salary only. In 2012only; since October 31, 2011, the ITT Salaried Investment and Savings Planplan considers salary and bonus as eligible pay.

The Company provides only those perquisites that it considers to be reasonable and consistent with competitive practice.practices. Perquisites available for NEOsMs. Ramos, Mr. Scalera, Mr. Chicles and Ms. Creamer include a caran automobile allowance up toof $1,300 per month (a leased car is provided to Mr. Savi) and financial and estate planning.planning reimbursement of up to $15,000 per year. As noted above, the automobile allowance was eliminated on January 1, 2016. Mr. Savi is provided a leased car. Since 2011, the Company doeshas not provideprovided any tax gross-up for personal income taxes due on these perquisites.

Amounts reported as perquisites also include reimbursement of certain relocation-related expenses. Mr. Chicles has been receiving a $5,000 monthly allowance since June 2014 for housing and commuting expenses in connection with his appointment to lead the Industrial Process segment, which is headquartered in Seneca Falls, NY. The Company is committed to only providing special relocation assistance when there is a compelling business need to do so. As noted in the Executive Summary, the Company is making significant investments in its people, focusing on talent management and building capability to grow our leaders from within. These investments will enable the Company to identify and develop leaders with a greater focus on effective succession planning.
Retirement plan for Mr. Savi:Mr. Savi participates in a supplemental retirement plan provided under the terms of thea collective bargaining agreement for industrial sector businesses.agreement. These benefits are provided in addition to the government providedItalian government-provided retirement benefits. Under the terms of the plan Mr. Savi can contribute up to €6,000 annually and receive a company matching contribution of up to €6,000.

Employee Benefits for Mr.Savi:    Mr. Savi:Mr. Savi participates inis eligible for other statutory retirement and health and welfare benefits that are alsogenerally provided to other Italian employees.

Relocation Expenses for Mr. Savi:    At the time ofour employees in Italy. During Mr. Savi’s employmentassignment in November 2011, we agreed to reimburse him for relocation expenses to assist in the costs associated withChina, he and his move from Detroit, Michigan to Italy. Costs associated with this relocation that were incurred in fiscal year 2012 included reimbursement of loss on the sale of his home, closing costs, the movement of physical goods and temporary living expenses for the first two years of his employment. Under the Company’s relocation program, he received reimbursement for taxes associated with certain of these relocation expenses. The relocation program also includes the payment of one month’s salary, grossed up for taxes, to assist with miscellaneous expense. Mr. Savi also received a relocation bonus

of €60,000, of which €30,000 was paid in 2011 and €30,000 was paid in 2012. The relocation was primarily completed in 2012, some minor expenses may be paid in 2013, and thus the amount paid by the Company to Mr. Savi in connection with this relocation was a non-recurring event.

Post-Employment Compensation

Salaried Retirement Plan.    Until October 31, 2011, most of the Company’s salaried employees who work in the United States participated in the ITT Salaried Retirement Plan. Under the plan, participants had the option, on an annual basis, to elect tofamily will be covered by either a Traditional Pension Plan or a Pension Equity Plan formula for future pension accruals. The ITT Salaried Retirement Plan was a tax-qualifiedITT’s international healthcare coverage plan, which provided a base of financial security forcovers all employees after they cease working. The ITT Salaried Retirement Plan was transferred to Exelis Inc., our defense business that was spun offparticipate in the Spin Transaction, byan international assignment.



43



Other Compensation and Benefits
CEO Compensation and Employment Agreement
Ms. Ramos has an employment agreement with the Company effectivethat governs the terms of her employment. The agreement was entered into on the October 31, 2011 and both service credit and accrued benefits were frozen as of that date, subject to transition employer contributions into the ITT Retirement Savings Plandoes not have a stated expiration date. Ms. Ramos’ compensation for Salaried Employees.

Excess Pension Plans.    Because federal law limits the amount of benefits that can be paid and the amount of compensation that can be recognized under tax-qualified retirement plans, the Company established and maintained non-qualified, unfunded excess pension plans solely to pay retirement benefits that could not be paid from the ITT Salaried Retirement Plan. All of our NEOs except Messrs. Korber and Savi are eligible to participate in this plan. Benefits under the excess pension plans were generally paid directly by the Company. Participating officers with excess plan benefits had the opportunity to make a one-time election prior to December 31, 2008 to receive their excess benefit earned under the Traditional Pension Plan formula (described elsewhere in this Proxy Statement2015 is set forth under the heading “Compensation Tables — The Company’s Pension Benefits”) in a single discounted lump-sum payment or as an annuity. An election of a single-sum payment was only effective if the officer met the requirements for early or normal retirement benefits under the plan; otherwise, the excess benefit earned under the Traditional Pension Plan formula would be paid as an annuity. Since the excess pension plans are an unfunded obligation of the Company, in the event of a change of control, any excess plan benefit would become immediately payable, subject to any applicable Section 409A restrictions with respect to form and timing of payments, and would be paid in a single discounted sum. The single-sum payment provision provides executives the earliest possible access to the funds in the event of a change of control, and avoids leaving unfunded pension payments in the hands of the acquirer. The Excess Pension Plan that provided benefits in addition to those that could be received under the tax-qualified ITT Salaried Retirement Plan was transferred to Exelis Inc. by the Company, effective on the date of the Spin Transaction, and both service credit and accrued benefits were frozen as of that date, subject to transition credits.

Deferred“CEO Compensation Plan.    All of our NEOs except Mr. Savi are eligible to participate in the ITT Deferred Compensation Plan. This plan provides executives an opportunity to defer receipt of between 2% and 90% of any AIP payments they earn. The amount of deferred compensation ultimately received reflects the performance of benchmark investment funds made available under the Deferred Compensation Plan as selected by the executive. Participants in the Deferred Compensation Plan may elect a fund that tracks the performance of the Company’s common stock.

Severance Plan Arrangements

The Company maintains two severance plans for most of its senior executives, including all of the NEOs except Mr. Savi — the Senior Executive Severance Pay Plan and the Special Senior Executive Severance Pay Plan. The Company’s Senior Executive Severance Pay Plan and Special Senior Executive Severance Pay Plan were originally established in 1984 and are regularly reviewed by the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee is currently undergoing a review of these plans to ensure that they are consistent with competitive market practices.

The purpose of the Senior Executive Severance Pay Plan is to provide a period of transition for senior executives. Senior executives who are U.S. citizens or who are employed in the United States

are covered by this plan. The plan generally provides for severance payments if the Company terminates a senior executive’s employment without cause.

The purpose of the Special Senior Executive Severance Pay Plan is to provide compensation in the case of termination of employment in connection with an acceleration event (defined under the heading “Potential Post-Employment Compensation — Change of Control Arrangements”) including a change of control. The provisions of this plan are specifically designed to address the inability of senior executives to influence the Company’s future performance after certain change of control events. The plan is structured to encourage executives to act in the best interests of shareholders by providing for certain compensation and retention benefits and payments, including change of control provisions, in the case of an acceleration event.

These plans, including the potential post-employment payments that our NEOs would receive pursuant to these plans, are described in more detail elsewhere in this Compensation Discussion and Analysis under the heading “Potential Post-Employment Compensation.Decisions. The severance plans apply to the Company’s key employees as defined by Section 409A. The Company’s severance plan arrangements are not considered in determining other elements of compensation.

Mr. Savi does not participate in the Senior Executive Severance Pay Plan. Mr. Savi participates under the National Collective Agreement for the Industrial Sector Managers. This agreement provides Mr. Savi with termination benefits in the event his employment is terminated for other than cause.

CEO COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENTS

Denise L. Ramos Compensation and Employment Agreements:    Upon her appointment as Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, effective October 31, 2011, Ms. Ramos’ compensation in the role was as follows:

Ÿ

Annual base salary of $850,000.

Ÿ

AIP target incentive payment of 100% of base salary, with a range of possible payment of 0% to 200% of the target. The AIP target incentive percentage was made effective starting with the 2012 fiscal year.

Ÿ

Long-Term Incentive Award target award expected value of $2,800,000.

Ms. Ramos’ employment letter also provided that Ms. Ramos would receive a Founders’ Grant in connection with the Spin Transaction composed of non-qualified stock options and RSUs with terms set forth in her employment letter and having an aggregate expected value of $4,200,000, based on the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the November 7, 2011 grant date.

In 2012, the Compensation Committee elected not to increase Ms. Ramos’ compensation, either in total or by compensation element. The Compensation Committee took this action because Ms. Ramos’ compensation was reviewed and adjusted in November 2011 at the time of the Spin Transaction.

If the Company terminates her employment other than for cause (as defined in her employment letter)agreement) and other than as a result of her death or disability, in any case prior to her normal retirement date, Ms. Ramos will, subject to certain conditions and limitations set forth in her employment letter,agreement, be entitled to severance pay in an amount equal to two times the sum of her then-current annual base salary and target annual incentive payable in installments over 24 months and will also be entitled to receive certain benefits during that time. The terms of her employment agreement were described in the amended Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 17,20, 2011.

Post-Employment Compensation
Deferred Compensation Plan.  Our NEOs, except Mr. Savi, are eligible to participate in the ITT Deferred Compensation Plan. This plan provides United States executives an opportunity to defer receipt of between 2% and 90% of any AIP awards they earn. The amount of deferred compensation ultimately received reflects the performance of benchmark investment funds made available under the Deferred Compensation Committee reviewsPlan as selected by the compensationexecutive. Participants in the Deferred Compensation Plan may elect a fund that tracks the performance of the CEO and all of her direct reports to ensure that any and all differences are understood and appropriate. The Compensation Committee reviews the overall pay structure to ensure internal pay equity and competitiveness with market practices.

KEY PARTICIPANTS IN THE COMPENSATION PROCESSCompany’s common stock.

Role

Frozen Plans
ITT Salaried Retirement Plan: Until October 31, 2011, most of the Compensation Committee:    Company’s salaried employees who work in the United States participated in the ITT Salaried Retirement Plan. Under the plan, participants could elect, on an annual basis, to be covered by either a Traditional Pension Plan (described elsewhere in this Proxy Statement under the heading “Compensation Tables—2015 Pension Benefits”) or a Pension Equity Plan formula for future pension accruals. The Compensation Committee, with input from corporate-level managementITT Salaried Retirement Plan was a tax-qualified plan, which provided a base of financial security for employees after they cease working. The ITT Salaried Retirement Plan was transferred by the Company to Exelis Inc., our defense business that was spun off in the Spin Transaction, effective on October 31, 2011, and external databoth service credit and advice fromaccrued benefits were frozen as of that date, and certain participants are eligible to receive transition employer contributions into the Independent Compensation Consultant, reviews and approves eachITT Retirement Savings Plan.
ITT Excess Pension Plan: Because federal law limits the amount of benefits that can be paid and the amount of compensation that can be recognized under tax-qualified retirement plans, the Company established, and until October 31, 2011 maintained, a non-qualified, unfunded excess pension plan solely to pay retirement benefits that could not be paid from the ITT Salaried Retirement Plan. Ms. Ramos, Mr. Scalera and Mr. Chicles participated in this plan. The ITT Excess Pension Plan was transferred by the Company to Exelis Inc., effective on the date of the Spin Transaction, and both service credit and accrued benefits were frozen as of that date. In 2015, the Harris Corporation acquired Exelis, Inc., which triggered a lump sum payout of individual benefits accumulated under the ITT Excess Pension Plan. As of December 31, 2015 the Plan has been paid out and closed, and none of the NEOs have any additional benefits owed to them under this Plan.
Severance Plan Arrangements
The Company maintains severance arrangements for most of the compensation targets forits senior executives, including all of the Company’s executive officers, including its NEOs. NEOs except Mr. Savi. These arrangements are included in two plans, one covering most severance circumstances (the Senior Executive Severance Pay Plan), and the other covering severance following a change-in-control event (the Senior Executive Change in Control Severance Pay Plan). These plans are regularly reviewed by the Compensation and Personnel Committee.
The Compensation Committee reviewed each compensation elementpurpose of the Senior Executive Severance Pay Plan is to provide a period of transition for senior executives. The Senior Executive Severance Pay Plan applies to Mr. Scalera, Mr. Chicles and Ms. Creamer. The severance terms for Ms. Ramos are covered under her employment agreement. The severance terms for Mr. Savi are covered under the National Collective Agreement for the Industrial Sector Managers in Italy. This agreement provides Mr. Savi with termination benefits in the event his employment is terminated for other than cause. Senior executives, who are full-time salaried employees of the Company or any subsidiary, who are paid under a U.S. payroll and who report directly to the CEO, are covered by the Senior Executive Severance Pay Plan. The plan generally provides for severance payments if the Company terminates a senior executive’s employment without cause.
The purpose of the Senior Executive Change in Control Severance Pay Plan is to provide compensation in the case of termination of employment in connection with an acceleration event (defined under the heading “Potential Post—Employment Compensation—Change of Control Arrangements”) including a change of control. The provisions of this plan are specifically designed to address the inability of senior executives to influence the Company’s future performance after certain change of


44



control events. The plan is structured to encourage executives to act in the best interests of shareholders by providing for certain compensation and otherretention benefits and payments in the case of an acceleration event.
These plans, including the potential post-employment payments that our NEOs and made the final determination regarding executive compensation forwould receive pursuant to these officers using the processesplans, are described in more detail elsewhere in this Compensation Discussion and Analysis. It also makes determinations with respectAnalysis under the heading “Potential Post-Employment Compensation.” The severance plans apply to the AIPCompany’s key employees as it relatesdefined by Section 409A.
Policies
The Role of Risk and Risk Mitigation
In 2015, the Compensation and Personnel Committee evaluated risk factors associated with the Company’s businesses in determining compensation structure and pay practices. The structure of the Board of Directors’ committees facilitates this evaluation and determination. More specifically, during 2015, the Chair of the Compensation and Personnel Committee was a member of the Audit Committee. This membership overlap provides insight into the Company’s business risks and affords the Compensation and Personnel Committee access to our executive officers, including the approvalinformation necessary to consider the impact of annual performance goalsbusiness risks on compensation structure and subsequent full-year achievement againstpay practices. Further, overall enterprise risk is considered and discussed at Board meetings, providing additional important information to the Compensation and Personnel Committee. The Chief Executive Officer and President, and the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, attend those goals. It administers all elementsportions of the Compensation and Personnel Committee meetings at which plan features and design configurations of the Company’s annual and long-term incentive grantplans are considered and approved.
We believe our executive compensation program and approves the benefits and perquisites offered toappropriately balances risk with maximizing long-term shareholder value. The following features of our executive officers. It evaluates all compensation programs on an annual basis to ensure that no plans induce or encourage excessive risk-taking by its participants.

Role of Management:    The Compensation Committee has delegatedprogram especially contribute to the Company’s senior human resources executive responsibility for administering the executiveachievement of this goal:

Emphasis on Long-Term Compensation.    By granting long-term incentive compensation program. During 2012, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, senior human resources executive, as well as other senior executives, made recommendationsat 30% to 68% of our NEOs’ total compensation package, the Compensation and Personnel Committee regarding executive compensation actions and incentive awards. They serve as a liaisonbelieves that it is encouraging strategies that correlate with the Independent Compensation Consultant, providing internal data on an as-needed basis so that the Independent Compensation Consultant can provide comparative analyses to the Compensation Committee. In 2012, the Company’s human resources, finance and legal departments supported the worklong-term interests of the Compensation Committee, provided information, answered questions and responded to requests.

Role of the Independent Compensation Consultant:    In 2012, the Compensation Committee retained the Independent Compensation Consultant to provide independent consulting services to support the Compensation Committee in fulfilling its obligations under its charter, the material terms of which areCompany. The Company’s long-term incentive awards, described elsewhere in this proxy statementCompensation Discussion and Analysis under the heading “Committees“Elements of Compensation—2015 Long-Term Incentive Compensation,” feature a three-year vesting threshold for senior vice presidents and 10-year stock option terms, encouraging behavior focused on long-term value creation. Performance unit awards focus on ITT’s three-year stock price and Return on Invested Capital, encouraging behavior focused on long-term goals while discouraging behavior focused on short-term risks.

Pay Mix.    16% to 42% of total target compensation is fixed for NEOs while the Boardremaining total compensation is tied to performance, consistent with the Company’s pay-for-performance philosophy. As scope of Directors.” The Independent Compensation Consultant also provided independent consulting servicesresponsibility increases, the amount of performance-based pay increases and fixed pay decreases in support of the Compensation Committee’s charter, including providing competitive data on director compensation.

The Independent Compensation Consultant’s engagement leader provided the Compensation Committee with objective expert analyses, assessments, research and recommendations for executive and non-executive employee compensation programs, incentives, perquisites, and compensation standards. In this capacity, the Independent Compensation Consultant provided services that related solely to work performed for and at the direction of the Compensation Committee including analysis of material prepared by corporate-level management for the Compensation Committee’s review. Additionally, the Independent Compensation Consultant provided analysesrelation to the Nominatinglevel within the Company. The Company’s incentive design provides multiple performance time frames and Governance Committeea variety of financial measures that are intended to drive profitable and the full Board of Directors on non-management director compensation.sustained growth.

Clawback Policy.    The Compensation Consultant provided no other services to the Company during 2012.

Fees paid to the Independent Compensation Consultant in 2012 are set forth in the table below.

Ÿ   Services performed that related solely to work performed for, and at the direction of, the Compensation Committee or the Nominating and Governance Committee, and analyses of documents prepared by corporate-level management for the Compensation Committee’s review during 2012:

  $359,411 

Ÿ   Other services performed for the Company during 2012:

  $0 

The Compensation Committee annually reviews the Independent Compensation Consultant’s independence, and determined the Independent Compensation Consultant was independent in 2012. The Compensation Committee has reviewed the relationship with the Independent Compensation Consultant and has determined that no conflicts of interest currently exist. The Compensation Committee has sole authority to retain and terminate consultants, including the Independent Compensation Consultant, with respect to compensation matters.

RECOUPMENT POLICY

In 2008, the Company, upon the recommendation of the Compensation Committee, adopted a policy that provides for recoupment of performance-based compensation if the Board of Directors determines that a senior executive has engaged in fraud or willful misconduct that caused or otherwise contributed to the need for a material restatement of the Company’s financial results. In such a situation, the Board will review all compensation awarded to or earned by that senior executive on the basis of the Company’s financial performance during fiscal periods materiallyaffected by the restatement. This would include annual cash incentive and bonus awards and all forms of equity-based compensation. If, in the Board’s view, the compensation related to the Company’s financial performance would have been lower if it had been based on the restated results, the Board will, to the extent permitted by applicable law, seek recoupment from that senior executive of any portion of such compensation as it deems appropriate after a review of all relevant facts and circumstances. The NEOs are covered by this policy. In 2014, the Compensation and Personnel Committee amended the Clawback Policy to cover all executives that receive performance unit awards.

Required Executive Stock Ownership.    NEOs are required to own Company shares or share equivalents with a value equal to a multiple of their base salary, as discussed in more detail below. We believe this requirement aligns their interests with the interests of the Company’s shareholders and also discourages behavior that is focused only on the short-term.
Prohibition Against Speculating, Hedging or Pledging Company Stock.    The Company has a policy prohibiting employees from hedging and speculative trading in and out of the Company’s securities, including short sales and leverage transactions, such as puts, calls, and listed and unlisted options. The Company also prohibits employees from pledging Company securities as collateral for a loan.


45



Rule 10b5-1 Trading Plans.    ITT’s Board of Directors has authorized the use by executive officers of prearranged trading plans under Rule 10b5-1 under the Exchange Act. Rule 10b5-1 permits insiders to adopt predetermined plans for selling specified amounts of stock or exercising stock options under specified conditions and at specified times. Executive officers may only enter into a trading plan during an open trading window and they must not possess material nonpublic information regarding the Company at the time they adopt the plan. Using trading plans, insiders can diversify their investment portfolios while avoiding concerns about transactions occurring at a time when they might possess material nonpublic information. Generally, under these trading plans, the individual relinquishes control over the transactions once the trading plan is put into place. Accordingly, sales under these plans may occur at any time, including possibly before, simultaneously with, or immediately after significant events involving the Company. Both new plans and modifications are subject to a mandatory “waiting period” designed to safeguard the plans from manipulation or market timing. All trading plans adopted by executive officers are reviewed and approved by the Company’s Legal Department.

EXECUTIVE STOCK OWNERSHIP GUIDELINES

Executive Stock Ownership Guidelines
The Company maintains stock ownership guidelines for all of its executives,executive officers, including the NEOs. TheExecutive officers have five years in order to meet the guidelines.
Share ownership guidelines which are described in greater detail elsewhere in this Proxy Statement under the heading “Stock Ownership Information,”for officers specify the desired levels of Company stock ownership and encourage a set of behaviors for each officer to reach the guideline levels. The approved guidelines requirespecify expected share ownership levels expressed as a multiple of base salary, for all corporate officers. The guidelines for all Company executives are:

CEO

5 X Annual Base Salary

CFO and EVP

3 X Annual Base Salary

Senior Vice Presidents

2 X Annual Base Salary

Vice Presidents

1 X Annual Base Salary

as set forth in the table below. In achieving these ownership levels, shares owned outright, Company restricted stock and unvested RSUs, shares held in the Company’s dividend reinvestment plan, shares owned in the ITT Salaried Investment andRetirement Savings Plan, and “phantom” shares held in a fund that tracks an index of the Company’s stock in the deferred compensation plan are considered.

To attain the ownership levels set forth in the guidelines, any restricted shares that become unrestricted and all shares acquired through the exercise of stock options will be held, except, in all cases, to the extent necessary to meet tax and exercise price obligations.
Both the guidelines, and compliance with the guidelines, are monitored periodically.
Chief Executive Officer5 X Annual Base Salary
Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice Presidents3 X Annual Base Salary
Senior Vice Presidents2 X Annual Base Salary
Selected Vice Presidents1 X Annual Base Salary
As of the writingdate of this proxy statement,Proxy Statement, all NEOs either have met the guidelines, or are expectedon track to meet the guidelines within the next two years, with the exceptionguidelines.
Considerations of Mr. Savi who will have five years from his date of hire to achieve the guideline.

CONSIDERATIONS OF TAX AND ACCOUNTING IMPACTS

Tax and Accounting Impacts

Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code places a limit of $1,000,000 on the amount of compensation that the Company may deduct in any one year with respect to its Chief Executive Officer and the three other highest-paid NEOs, other than the Chief Financial Officer. There is an exception to the $1,000,000 limitation for performance-based compensation meeting certain requirements. Compensation attributable toOur AIP awards as well as awards under the Company’s AIP andour long-term incentive program are generally structuredintended to qualify as performance-based compensation deductible under Section 162(m).

However, the Compensation and Personnel Committee realizes that evaluation of the overall performance of the senior executives cannot be reduced in all cases to a fixed formula. There may be situations in which the prudent use of discretion in determining pay levels is in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders and, therefore, desirable. In those situations where discretion is used, awards may be structured in ways that will not permit them to qualify as performance-based compensation under Section 162(m).

The Company’s plans are intended to comply with Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code, to the extent applicable,applicable.


46



CEO Compensation Decisions
2015 Pay Decisions for the CEO
The Company’s executive compensation philosophy ties a substantial percentage of CEO compensation to business performance and stock price performance. In the Companyfirst quarter of each year, the Compensation and Personnel Committee meets to determine CEO pay decisions for base salary, AIP, and long-term incentive grants reflecting both prior year performance and appropriate positioning versus the Representative Peer Group. The following table displays the decisions made amendments toin the plans during 2008 in this regard. While the Company complies with other applicable sectionsfirst quarter of the Internal Revenue Code with respect to compensation, the Company2015 and the Compensation Committee do not consider other tax implicationsand Personnel Committee’s rationale:
Pay ComponentFirst Quarter 2015 Decisions (following 2014 performance)Decision Driver for First Quarter 2015 Decisions
Base Salary(1)
$1,000,000Ms. Ramos’ base salary was increased from $950,000 to $1,000,000 in recognition of her leadership in driving strong operating performance, building a foundation and culture for continued future growth and delivering significant shareholder value since the Spin Transaction.
Annual Incentive Plan(2)
1,412,689The Company significantly exceeded its financial targets, resulting in a 2014 AIP payout for Ms. Ramos of 149% of target based on significant increases in adjusted earnings per share, cash flow, operating margins and revenue growth. These metrics are fundamental to the growth in shareholder value. Ms. Ramos was also recognized for her performance related to personal and team goals associated with strategic initiatives. Ms. Ramos’ AIP target for 2015 remained at 100% of base salary.
Long-Term Incentives(3)
4,250,000The 2015 LTI award was increased from $3,500,000 to $4,250,000 reflecting Ms. Ramos’ strong leadership, proven financial and operational results and continued focus on increasing long-term shareholder value.
Total Direct Compensation$6,662,689
(1)The base salary total differs from what is displayed in the Summary Compensation Table which appears later in this Proxy Statement because the new salary did not become effective until February 28, 2015.
(2)The AIP bonus shown was paid in March 2015 and is based on 2014 performance and therefore is included in the Summary Compensation Table under 2014 compensation.
(3)The LTI value also differs from what is displayed in the Summary Compensation Table and the Grants of Plan-Based Awards in 2015 table, each of which present the value recorded for accounting purposes.
Pay Decisions for the CEO Following 2015
The following table displays the decisions made in designing its compensation programs.

the first quarter of 2016 and the Compensation and Personnel Committee’s rationale:

Pay Component
First Quarter 2016
Decisions
(following 2015
performance)
Decision Driver for First Quarter 2016 Decisions
Base Salary$1,000,000The Committee considered Ms. Ramos’ base salary to be competitively positioned and did not increase the rate for 2016.
Annual Incentive Plan(1)
$1,162,000Ms. Ramos received an AIP payout that was 116% of target. As described above, 90% of the AIP payout for NEOs is tied directly to ITT’s financial results. The Committee chose to award Ms. Ramos an above target payout for the 10% individual component of the AIP to recognize her leadership in delivering strong net operating productivity and effective cost containment in a challenging macroeconomic environment. Ms. Ramos’ AIP target for 2016 remains at 100% of base salary.
Long-Term Incentives(2)
$4,500,000The Committee increased Ms. Ramos’ LTI grant value to $4,500,000 in 2016 to reward her leadership and further align her pay with the long-term success of ITT.
Total Direct Compensation$6,662,000
(1)The AIP bonus shown was paid in March 2016 and is included in the Summary Compensation Table as 2015 compensation.
(2)The LTI value was granted in February 2016 and is not included in the Summary Compensation Table and the Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table below.



47

COMPENSATION TABLES



Compensation Tables
Summary Compensation Table

The following table provides information regarding the compensation earned by each of our named executive officers as defined by the SEC in Item 402(a) of Regulation S-K (“NEOs”).

Name and Principal
Position
 Year   Salary
($)
  Bonus
($)
  Stock
Awards
($)(1)
  Option
Awards
($)(2)
  Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
($)(3)
  

Change in
Pension

Value and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings
($)(4)

  All Other
Compensation
($)(5)
  

Total

($)

 

Denise L. Ramos

  2012     850,000    —      1,870,000    935,000    978,350    109,444    30,528    4,773,322  

Chief Executive

  2011     640,788    20,000   3,158,816    2,965,014    687,500    265,992    51,443    7,789,553  

Officer & President

  2010     580,384    —      845,946    413,641    774,300    124,047    67,981    2,806,299  

Aris C. Chicles

  2012     420,000    —      420,000    210,000    542,565    63,892    29,192    1,685,649  
Executive Vice President  2011     365,385    7,500    1,010,543    949,151    483,500    129,839    35,785    2,981,703  

Thomas M. Scalera

  2012     381,246    —      400,000    200,000    460,300    13,715    24,994    1,480,255  

Chief Financial Officer

  2011     289,800    1,850    445,763    433,008    296,800    34,941    12,840    1,515,002  

Robert J. Pagano, Jr.

  2012     400,000    —      266,633    133,333    388,000    295,425    17,023    1,500,414  

President, Industrial

Process

  2011     355,273    7,072    564,697    596,532    376,100    460,899    1,294,205    3,654,778  

Luca Savi

President, Motion

Technologies

  2012     487,154(6)   —      182,633    91,333    217,684    —      299,967    1,278,771  

Thomas F. Korber

Former Senior Vice

President, Human

Resources

  2012     292,115    —      243,367    121,667    243,537    —      992,869    1,893,555  

William E. Taylor

  2012     330,431    —      222,633    111,333    160,000    83,865    1,492,888    2,401,150  

Former Senior Vice

President and Former

               

President, Interconnect

Solutions

                                     
NEOs.
Name and Principal PositionYearSalary
Bonus(1)
Stock Awards(2)
Option Awards(3)
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Comp(4)
Change in
Pension
Value and
Non-qualified
Deferred
Comp
Earnings(5)
All Other
Comp(6)
Total
Denise L. Ramos
Chief Executive Officer & President
2015$992,308
$
$3,335,117
$1,062,571
$1,162,000
$24,729
$244,883
$6,821,608
2014942,308

2,760,828
907,789
1,412,689
234,036
355,421
6,613,071
2013890,384

2,320,489
712,847
1,449,000

114,504
5,487,224
Thomas M. Scalera
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
2015468,077

828,180
200,034
417,525

87,092
2,000,908
2014426,615

512,893
168,588
469,899
18,845
88,073
1,684,913
2013406,461

506,281
155,541
474,300

43,834
1,586,417
Aris C. Chicles
Executive Vice President and President, Industrial Process
2015437,192

588,785
187,543
348,608

144,675
1,706,803
2014428,462

512,893
168,588
382,969
109,950
152,670
1,755,532
2013420,000

771,182
160,111
497,700

66,118
1,915,111
Luca Savi
Executive Vice President and President Motion Technologies
(7)
2015460,394

655,384
81,309
432,207

732,586
2,361,880
2014539,162

345,518
77,833
457,725

164,713
1,584,951
2013517,778

252,664
69,663
397,823

152,533
1,390,461
Victoria Creamer
Senior Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer
2015321,731
570,000
378,666
87,554
235,620

63,237
1,656,808
         
         
(1)The payment for Ms. Creamer was made pursuant to her employment offer letter and intended as an inducement to employment to replace the value of unvested equity awards from her previous employer that she forfeited upon joining the Company in February 2015.
(2)Amounts in this column include the aggregate grant date fair value computed in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”)FASB ASC Topic 718 for TSR Award unitsperformance unit awards and RSUs. A TSR Award is considered a liability under the provisions of FASB ASC Topic 718. A discussion of RSUs, the TSR Awardperformance unit awards and assumptions used in calculating these values may be found in Note 1716 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in the Company’s 20122015 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

(2)

(3)Amounts in this column include the aggregate grant date fair value of non-qualified stock option awards in the year of grant based on a binomial lattice valuation. A discussion of assumptions

relating to stock option awards may be found in Note 1716 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in the Company’s 20122015 Form 10-K. The 2011 amounts for Ms. Ramos and for Messrs. Chicles, Scalera and Pagano include one-time option modification expenses
(4)As described in the “2015 Annual Incentive Plan” section of $334,686, $128,555, $36,780 and $164,019, respectively. As previously disclosed, in connection with the Spin Transaction, the Compensation Committee approved a conversionDiscussion and Analysis on pages 36-38 of all unvested restricted stock, unvested RSUs and unexercised stock option awards. This conversion resulted in a one-time modification expense related to previously granted stock options, as requiredthis Proxy Statement, the amounts reported reflect compensation earned for performance under ASC Topic 718.

(3)Amounts in this columnthe annual incentive compensation program for all NEOs includethat year. AIP awards for the performance year 2012, determined by the Compensation Committee on March 5, 2013, which to the extent not deferred by an executive, were paid out shortly after that date. Amounts include Transition Success Incentive (“TSI”) Bonus for Messrs. Chicles, Scalera, Pagano and Taylor. As previously disclosed, these TSI Bonus payments were made in March 2012, four months following2016. None of the Spin Transaction date, and all plan participants neededNEOs chose to remain employed bydefer their 2015 AIP payment into the Company through the payment date in order to be eligible to receive a TSI bonus.Deferred Compensation Plan.



48



(4)No NEO received preferential or above-market earnings on deferred compensation.
(5)The change in the present value in accrued pension benefits was determined by measuring the present value of the accrued benefit at the representative dates using a discount rate of 5.75%4.0% for December 31, 2010, 4.75%2014 and 4.3% for December 31, 2011 and 4.09% for December 21, 20122015 (corresponding to the discount rates used for the ITT Salaried Retirement Plan). These pension plans are frozen and no additional benefits are being accrued, so the change in pension value reported is a result of changes to the actuarial assumptions used to calculate the present value of the benefits rather than an increase of the benefits. Below is the change in pension value for each NEO from December 31, 2014 to December 31, 2015.

Named Executive OfficerITT Salaried Retirement PlanITT  Excess Pension PlanTotal
Denise L. Ramos $(5,124) $
 $(5,124)
Thomas M. Scalera (1,629) 
 (1,629)
Aris C. Chicles (6,270) 
 (6,270)
Luca Savi 
 
 
Victoria Creamer 
 
 
Assumptions used to calculate the above amounts can be found immediately after the 2015 Pension Benefits table. The value of the ITT Salaried Retirement Plan benefits decreased in 2015 and therefore such amounts have not been included in the Summary Compensation Table. Ms. Creamer was hired after October 31, 2011, the date on which the plans were frozen. Mr. Savi is eligible for retirement benefits in Italy.
Accrued benefits under the ITT Excess Pension Plan were paid out to eligible employees on June 1, 2015 due to the Harris Corporation acquisition of Exelis and therefore no values are included in this table. The following NEOs received payments under this plan:
Named Executive OfficerLump Sum Payment AmountPension Value Change from Dec. 31, 2014 to June 1, 2015
Denise L. Ramos $895,566
  $189,175
 
Thomas M. Scalera 44,521
  8,330
 
Aris C. Chicles 387,494
  104,243
 
The non-qualified deferred compensation earnings include investment returns that were in excess of 3.29%, which was 120% of the Applicable Federal Long-term Rate (AFR) in December 2014 when the deferred compensation plan fixed rate option percentage was set. Ms. Ramos is the only NEO with a deferred compensation balance in 2015 and received $24,729 as a result of the earnings in excess of the AFR. The earnings were calculated by applying the rate of 0.71%, which is the difference between the fixed rate option return of 4.0% and the AFR of 3.29%.
(5)
(6)Amounts in this column for 20122015 represent items specified in the All Other Compensation Table.

(6)
(7)Mr. Savi received his salary in Euros. The dollar amount of Mr. Savi’s salarycompensation was calculated usingconverted from Euro (€) to U.S. dollars based on the December 2012 Treasury foreign currentaverage exchange rate of 1.281985 Euros to U.S. dollars.for the year Mr. Savi was paid. The exchange rates used were 1.11, 1.33 and 1.33 for 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively.



49



All Other Compensation Table

Name Executive Perquisites  All Other Compensation     
 Financial
Counseling
($)(1)
  Auto
Allowance
($)(2)
  Total
Perquisites
($)
  Severance
Payments
($)(3)
  Tax
Reimbursements
($)(4)
  Relocation
Expense
($)(5)
  Group
Life
Insurance
($)(6)
  Total All
Other
Compensation
($)
 

Denise L. Ramos

  10,800    15,600    26,400    —      —      —      4,128    30,528  

Aris C. Chicles

  12,571    15,600    28,171    —      —      —      1,021    29,192  

Thomas M. Scalera

  9,000    15,600    24,600    —      —          394    24,994  

Robert J. Pagano,Jr.

  457    15,600    16,057    —      —      —      966    17,023  

Luca Savi

  —      52,290    52,290    —      97,555    111,662        261,507  

Thomas F. Korber

  16,784    14,300    31,084    712,563    79,216    169,538    468    992,869  

William E. Taylor

  —      13,200    13,200    1,467,720    11,002    —      966    1,492,888  

 Denise L. RamosThomas M. ScaleraAris C. ChiclesLuca SaviVictoria Creamer
Executive Perquisites:          
Financial Counseling(1)
 $9,000
 $9,000
 $13,000
 $
 $15,000
Auto Allowance(2)
 15,600
 15,600
 15,600
 41,070
 14,340
Relocation Expense(3)
 
 
 60,000
 309,047
 
Total Perquisites 24,600
 24,600
 88,600
 350,117
 29,340
All Other Compensation:          
Tax Reimbursements(4)
 
 
 
 278,297
 
Insurance Benefits(5)
 4,852
 500
 1,069
 18,960
 478
Retirement Plan Contributions(6)
 215,431
 61,992
 55,006
 6,600
 33,419
Other(7)
 
 
 
 78,612
 
Total All Other Compensation $244,883
 $87,092
 $144,675
 $732,586
 $63,237
(1)Amounts represent taxable financial counseling and tax serviceestate planning services fees paid during 2012.2015.

(2)Semi-monthly taxable auto allowances arewere provided in 2015 to a range of executives, including the NEOs. Mr. Savi utilizes a car leased by the Company.

(3)Severance payments are based on base salary and service with the company and include (i) a lump sum payment for vacation and/or personal days, (ii) benefit costs, (iii) acceleration expense on restricted stock and options and (iv) TSR expense.Amounts under Relocation Expense:

Mr. Chicles receives a taxable $5,000 monthly allowance that was initiated in June 2014 for housing and commuting expenses in connection with his appointment to lead the Industrial Process business, which is headquartered in Seneca Falls, NY. No tax reimbursements were paid on this allowance.
Mr. Savi started an assignment in China during 2015. This assignment places one of ITT’s senior leaders in China, which is a country with significant potential growth for ITT. In connection with his assignment and pursuant to the ITT International Assignment policy, ITT provides allowances for the costs that Mr. Savi and his family incur in excess of their costs had they remained in Italy. The total amount includes: costs for his children to attend school in China ($119,243), housing costs in China ($57,937), cost of shipping household items from Italy to China ($40,762) and other assignment-related costs including immigration fees, transportation costs in China, cost of living differential between Italy and China and temporary housing and meals.
(4)The amounts for Mr. Savi and Mr. Korber reflect aUnder the ITT International Assignment policy, employees on assignment to another country maintain the tax equalization payment related to their relocation described in Note 5 below, which provided them with the same after-tax income astreatment they would have received hadif they not relocated atremained in their home country. Any incremental home or host country taxes associated with the requestassignment are paid by the Company. ITT paid $153,893 for taxes and associated gross-ups for Mr. Savi in connection with his assignment from Italy to China. In addition, Mr. Savi is a U.S. Green Card holder and has a U.S. tax liability and corresponding tax gross-up of $124,404 that was paid by the Company.

(5)The amounts for Mr. Savi and Mr. Korber reflect those expenses that the Company reimbursed for their respective relocations, which included reimbursement for the loss of sale on their homes. In Mr. Korber’s case the amount also includes a relocation allowance of $10,000 related to his relocation back to Philadelphia, PA following his departure from the Company.

(6)(5)Amounts include taxable group term-life insurance premiums attributable to each NEO.NEO, except Mr. Savi. Mr. Savi’s insurance benefits include taxable amounts for medical, business trip, life and disability.

(6)Amounts represent the total employer contributions under the ITT Retirement Savings Plan and the ITT Corporation Supplemental Retirement Savings Plan. 2015 contributions to the ITT Retirement Savings Plan are: $26,500 for Ms. Ramos, $18,550 for Mr. Scalera, $18,550 for Mr. Chicles and $15,900 for Ms. Creamer. Contributions to the ITT Corporation Supplemental Retirement Savings Plan are discussed in the 2015 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation table.
(7)The amount for Mr. Savi is the employer contribution to the Italian statutory termination indemnity fund that would be paid upon termination from the Company.


50



Grants of Plan-Based Awards in 2012

2015

The following table provides information about 20122015 equity and non-equity awards for the NEOs. The table includes the grant date for equity-based awards, the estimated future payouts under non-equity incentive plan awards (which consist of potential payouts under the 20122015 AIP) and estimated future payouts under 20122015 equity incentive plan awards, includingwhich consist of potential payouts related to the TSR targetperformance unit award granted in 20122015 for the 2012-20142015-2017 performance period (each unit equals $1).period. Also provided is the number of shares underlying all other stock and option awards, which are composed of RSU and non-qualified stock option awards. The table also provides the exercise price of the non-qualified stock option awards, reflecting the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the grant date and the grant date fair value of each equity award computed under FASB ASC Topic 718. The compensation plans under which the grants in the following table were made are described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis and include the AIP, TSR Awards,performance unit awards, RSU awards, and non-qualified stock options awards.

Name Action
Date
    Grant
  Date
  Estimated Future Payouts
Under Non-Equity Incentive
Plan Awards (1)
  Estimated Future Payouts
Under Equity Incentive Plan
Awards(2)
  All
Other
Stock
Awards:
Number
of
Shares
of Stock
or Units
(#)(3)
  

All

Other
Option
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Options
(#)(4)

  Exercise
or Base
Price of
Option
Awards
($ /
Sh)(5)
  

Grant
Date
Fair
Value -
Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards

($)(6)

 
   Threshold
($)
  Target
($)
  Maximum
($)
  Threshold
($)
  Target
($)
  Maximum
($)
     

Denise L. Ramos

  3/8/2012    3/8/2012    425,000    850,000    1,700,000                
   3/8/2012    3/8/2012          467,500    935,000    1,870,000          935,000  
   3/8/2012    3/8/2012(a)               41,009        935,005  
   3/8/2012    3/8/2012                                136,100    22.80    935,007  

Aris C. Chicles

  3/8/2012    3/8/2012    157,500    315,000    630,000                
   3/8/2012    3/8/2012          105,000    210,000    420,000          210,000  
   3/8/2012    3/8/2012(a)              9,211        210,011  
   3/8/2012    3/8/2012                                30,570    22.80    210,016  

Thomas M. Scalera

  3/8/2012    3/8/2012    150,000    300,000    600,000                
   3/8/2012    3/8/2012          100,000    200,000    400,000          200,000  
   3/8/2012    3/8/2012(a)               8,772        200,002  
   3/8/2012    3/8/2012                                29,115    22.80    200,020  

Robert J. Pagano, Jr.

  3/8/2012    3/8/2012    100,000    200,000    400,000                
   3/8/2012    3/8/2012          66,650    133,300    266,600          133,300  
   3/8/2012    3/8/2012(a)               5,848        133,334  
   3/8/2012    3/8/2012                                19,410    22.80    133,347  

Luca Savi

  3/8/2012    3/8/2012    109,610    219,219    438,438                
   3/8/2012    3/8/2012          45,650    91,300    182,600          91,300  
   3/8/2012    3/8/2012(a)               4,006        91,337  
   3/8/2012    3/8/2012                                13,295    22.80    91,337  

Thomas Korber

  3/8/2012    3/8/2012    71,042    142,083    284,166                
   3/8/2012    3/8/2012          60,850    121,700    243,400          121,700  
   3/8/2012    3/8/2012(a)               5,336        121,661  
   3/8/2012    3/8/2012                                17,710    22.80    121,668  

William E. Taylor

  3/8/2012    3/8/2012    75,150    150,300    300,600                
   3/8/2012    3/8/2012          55,650    111,300    222,600          111,300  
   3/8/2012    3/8/2012(a)               4,883        111,332  
   3/8/2012    3/8/2012                                16,210    22.80    111,363  

NameAction DateGrant Date
Estimated Future Payouts
Under Non-Equity Incentive
Plan Awards(1)
 
Estimated Future Payouts
Under Equity Incentive
Plan Awards(2)
All Other Stock Awards: Number of Shares of Stock or Units(3) (#)
All Other Option Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Options(4) (#)
Exercise or Base Price of Option Awards(5) ($)
Grant Date Fair Value: Equity Incentive Plan Awards(6)
ThresholdTargetMaximum 
Threshold
(#)
Target
(#)
Maximum
(#)
Denise L. Ramos2/25/20152/25/2015$500,000
$1,000,000
$2,000,000
        
 2/25/20152/25/2015    26,485
52,970
105,940
   $2,272,413
 2/25/20152/25/2015       25,595
  $1,062,704
 2/25/20152/25/2015        92,720
$41.52
$1,062,571
Thomas M. Scalera2/25/20152/25/2015$178,125
$356,250
$712,500
        
 2/25/20152/25/2015    4,988
9,975
19,950
   $427,928
 2/25/20152/25/2015       9,640
  $400,253
 2/25/20152/25/2015        17,455
$41.52
$200,034
Aris C. Chicles2/25/20152/25/2015$164,438
$328,875
$657,750
        
 2/25/20152/25/2015    4,675
9,350
18,700
   $401,115
 2/25/20152/25/2015       4,520
  $187,670
 2/25/20152/25/2015        16,365
$41.52
$187,543
Luca Savi2/25/20152/25/2015$150,072
$300,144
$600,288
        
 2/25/20152/25/2015    2,028
4,055
8,110
   $173,960
 2/25/20152/25/2015       11,595
  $481,424
 2/25/20152/25/2015        7,095
$41.52
$81,309
Victoria Creamer2/25/20152/25/2015$105,000
$210,000
$420,000
        
 2/25/20152/25/2015    2,183
4,365
8,730
   $187,259
 2/25/20152/25/2015       4,610
  $191,407
 2/25/20152/25/2015        7,640
$41.52
$87,554
(1)
Amounts reflect the threshold, target and maximum payment levels, respectively, if an award payout is achieved under the Company’s AIP. These potential payments are based on achievement of specific performance metrics and are completely at risk. The AIP target award is computed based upon the applicable range of net estimated payments denominated in dollars where the target award is equal to 100% of the award potential, the threshold is equal to 50% of target and the maximum is equal to 200% of target. Zero payment is possible for performance below threshold performance. Amounts for Ms. Ramosthe threshold. Mr. Savi is employed by ITT Italia s.r.l. and Messrs. Chicles, Scalera, Pagano, Savi, Korber and Taylor for the AIP reflect the threshold, target and maximum payment levels.his amounts have been converted from Euro (€) to U.S. dollars using a 2015 average exchange rate of 1.11.

(2)Amounts reflect the threshold, target and maximum paymentunit levels, respectively, if an award payout is achieved under the Company’s TSR Plan forperformance unit awards. These potential unit amounts are based on achievement of specific performance metrics and are completely at risk. The performance unit award is computed based upon the 2012-14 TSR Award Period describedapplicable range of net estimated payments denominated in units where the Compensation Discussiontarget award is equal to 100% of the award potential, the threshold is equal to 50% of target and Analysis under the heading “Elementsmaximum is equal to 200% of Compensation — TSR Awards Component.” Each unit under the TSR Plan equals $1.target.

(3)Amounts reflect the number of RSU awards granted in 20122015 to the NEOs.

(4)Amounts reflect the number of non-qualified stock options granted in 20122015 to the NEOs.

(5)The stock option exercise price for non-qualified stock options granted in 20122015 was the closing price of ITTour common stock on the date the non-qualified stock options were granted.

(6)Amounts in this column represent the aggregate grant date fair value computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 for TSR targetperformance unit awards, RSU awards, and non-qualified stock option awards granted to the NEOs in 2012.2015. A discussion of assumptions relating to stock option awards may be found in Note 1716 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in the Company’s 20122015 Form 10-K.



51

Outstanding Equity Awards at 2012 Fiscal Year End

Name

     Option Awards  Stock Awards 
 

Grant Date

(mm/dd/yyyy)

  

Number of

Securities

Underlying

Unexercised

Options (#)

Exercisable(1)

  

Number of

Securities

Underlying

Unexercised

Options (#)

Unexercisable

  

Equity Incentive

Plan Awards:

Number of

Securities

Underlying

Unexercised

Unearned

Options

(#)

  

Option

Exercise

Price

($)

  

Option

Expiration

Date

  Number of
Shares or
Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested
(#)(2)
  

Market

Value of

Shares or

Units of

Stock That

Have Not

Vested

($)(3)

  

Equity

Incentive

Plan

Awards:

Number of

Unearned

Shares, Units

or Other

Rights That

Have Not

Vested

($)

  

Equity

Incentive

Plan

Awards:

Market

or Payout

Value of

Unearned

Shares,

Units or

Other

Rights

That

Have Not

Vested

($)

 

Denise L. Ramos

  07/02/2007    43,829            25.75    7/2/2014    210,297    4,933,568          
   03/10/2008    48,721            19.82    3/10/2015                  
   03/05/2009    80,724            12.39    3/5/2016                  
   03/05/2010        71,590        19.97    3/5/2020                  
   03/03/2011        89,643        21.53    3/3/2021                  
   11/07/2011    100,865    201,729        20.28    11/7/2021                  
   03/08/2012        136,100        22.80    03/08/2022                  

Aris C. Chicles

  03/07/2007    15,793            21.64    3/7/2014    63,413    1,487,669          
   03/10/2008    22,250            19.82    3/10/2015                  
   03/05/2010        24,163        19.97    3/5/2020                  
   03/03/2011        32,217        21.53    3/3/2021                  
   11/07/2011    30,260    60,518        20.28    11/7/2021                  
   03/08/2012        30,570        22.80    3/8/2022                  

Thomas M. Scalera

  03/06/2006    5,082            19.66    3/6/2013    31,973    750,087          
   03/07/2007    4,286            21.64    3/7/2014                  
   03/10/2008    5,438            19.82    3/10/2015                  
   03/05/2009    8,868            12.39    3/5/2016                  
   03/05/2010    4,677    2,342        19.97    3/5/2020                  
   03/03/2011    3,102    6,208        21.53    3/3/2021                  
   11/07/2011    16,643    33,285        20.28    11/7/2021                  
   03/08/2012        29,115        22.80    3/8/2022                  

Robert J. Pagano, Jr.

  08/09/2004    10,716            14.29    8/9/2014    48,058    1,127,441          
   03/07/2007    19,169            21.64    3/7/2014                  
   03/10/2008    21,018            19.82    3/10/2015                  
   03/05/2009    33,851            12.39    3/5/2016                  
   03/05/2010    16,779    8,392        19.97    3/5/2020                  
   03/03/2011    8,268    16,541        21.53    3/3/2021                  
   11/07/2011    14,410    28,818        20.28    11/7/2021                  
   03/08/2012        19,410        22.80    3/8/2022                  

Luca Savi

  03/08/2012        13,295        22.80    3/8/2022    4,006    93,981          

Thomas F. Korber

  11/07/2011    7,205    14,409     20.28    11/7/2021    12,732    298,693          
   03/08/2012        17,710        22.80    3/8/2022                  

William E. Taylor

  03/07/2007    15,793            21.64    3/7/2014    29,698    696,715          
   03/10/2008    14,829            19.82    3/10/2015                  
   03/05/2009    23,925            12.39    3/5/2016                  
   03/05/2010    12,742    6,374        19.97    3/5/2020                  
   03/03/2011    6,199    12,408        21.53    3/3/2021                  
   11/07/2011    10,807    21,614        20.28    11/7/2021                  
   03/08/2012        16,210        22.80    3/8/2022                  



Outstanding Equity Awards at 20122015 Fiscal Year-EndYear End

  Option Awards Stock Awards
NameGrant DateNumber of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options Exercisable (#)
Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options Unexercisable(1) (#)
Equity 
Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Unearned Options
(#)
Option Exercise Price
($)
Option Expiration Date 
Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested(2)
(#)
Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested(3)
($)
Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested(2)
(#)
Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested(3)
($)
Denise L. Ramos3/3/201189,643


$21.53
3/3/2021  
  $
 
 $
 
 11/7/2011302,594


20.28
11/7/2021  
  
 
 
 
 3/8/2012136,100


22.80
3/8/2022  
  
 
 
 
 3/5/2013
105,295

26.76
3/5/2023  26,205
  951,766
 27,436
 996,476
 
 3/4/2014
74,470

43.52
3/4/2024  20,110
  730,395
 20,735
 753,095
 
 2/25/2015
92,720

41.52
2/25/2025  25,595
  929,610
 26,485
 961,935
 
Thomas M. Scalera3/5/20107,019


19.97
3/5/2020  
  
 
 
 
 3/3/20119,310


21.53
3/3/2021  
  
 
 
 
 11/7/201149,928


20.28
11/7/2021  
  
 
 
 
 3/8/201229,115


22.80
3/8/2022  
  
 
 
 
 3/5/2013
22,975

26.76
3/5/2023  5,717
  207,641
 5,986
 217,411
 
 3/4/2014
13,830

43.52
3/4/2024  3,735
  135,655
 3,853
 139,941
 
 2/25/2015
17,455

41.52
2/25/2025  9,640
  350,125
 4,987
 181,128
 
Aris C. Chicles3/5/201024,163


19.97
3/5/2020  
  
 
 
 
 3/3/201132,217


21.53
3/3/2021  
  
 
 
 
 11/7/201190,778


20.28
11/7/2021  
  
 
 
 
 3/8/201230,570


22.80
3/8/2022  
  
 
 
 
 3/5/2013
23,650

26.76
3/5/2023  15,228
  553,081
 6,162
 223,804
 
 3/4/2014
13,830

43.52
3/4/2024  3,735
  135,655
 3,853
 139,941
 
 2/25/2015
16,365

41.52
2/25/2025  4,520
  164,166
 4,675
 169,796
 
Luca Savi3/8/201213,295


22.80
3/8/2022  
  
 
 
 
 3/5/2013
10,290

26.76
3/5/2023  3,531
  128,246
 2,680
 97,338
 
 3/4/2014
6,385

43.52
3/4/2024  4,225
  153,452
 1,778
 64,577
 
 2/25/2015
7,095

41.52
2/25/2025  11,595
  421,130
 2,027
 73,621
 
Victoria Creamer2/25/2015
7,640

41.52
2/25/2025  4,610
  167,435
 2,182
 79,250
 
(1)Vesting schedule for unvested stock options (optionsoutstanding at 2015 fiscal year-end (stock options vest on the applicable anniversary of the grant date):

              Future Vesting Schedule (# of options) 
Name  Grant Date   Expiration Date   2013   2014   2015 

Denise L. Ramos

   3/5/2010     3/5/2020     71,590            
    3/3/2011     3/3/2021          89,643       
    11/7/2011     11/7/2021     100,865     100,864       
    3/8/2012     3/8/2022               136,100  

Aris C. Chicles

   3/5/2010     3/5/2020     24,163            
    3/3/2011     3/3/2021          32,217       
    11/7/2011     11/7/2021     30,259     30,259       
    3/8/2012     3/8/2022               30,570  

Thomas M. Scalera

   3/5/2010     3/5/2020     2,342            
    3/3/2011     3/3/2021     3,103     3,103       
    11/7/2011     11/7/2021     16,643     16,642       
    3/8/2012     3/8/2022               29,115  

Robert J. Pagano, Jr.

   3/5/2010     3/5/2020     8,391            
    3/3/2011     3/3/2021     8,270     8,269       
    11/7/2011     11/7/2021     14,409     14,409       
    3/8/2012     3/8/2022               19,410  

Luca Savi

   3/8/2012     3/8/2022               13,295  

Thomas F. Korber

   11/7/2011     11/7/2021     7,205     7,204       
    3/8/2012     3/8/2022               17,710  

William E. Taylor

   3/5/2010     3/5/2020     6,374            
    3/3/2011     3/3/2021     6,203     6,205       
    11/7/2011     11/7/2021     10,807     10,807       
    3/8/2012     3/8/2022               16,210  

 Grant DateExpiration DateFuture Vesting  Schedule (# of options)
Name201620172018
Denise L. Ramos3/5/20133/5/2023105,295


 3/4/20143/4/2024
74,470

 2/25/20152/25/2025

92,720
Thomas M. Scalera3/5/20133/5/202322,975


 3/4/20143/4/2024
13,830

 2/25/20152/25/2025

17,455
Aris C. Chicles3/5/20133/5/202323,650


 3/4/20143/4/2024
13,830

 2/25/20152/25/2025

16,365
Luca Savi3/5/20133/5/202310,290


 3/4/20143/4/2024
6,385

 2/25/20152/25/2025

7,095
Victoria Creamer2/25/20152/25/2025

7,640
(2)Vesting schedule for unvested restricted stock and unvested RSUs (restricted stock and RSUs vest on the applicablethird anniversary of the grant date):date. Performance units vest upon the completion of a three year performance period beginning January 1 of the grant year and are shown at threshold payout. The 2013 performance unit award will be settled in March 2016 at 165% of target.

        Future Vesting Schedule (# of shares) 
Name  Grant Date  2013   2014   2015 

Denise L. Ramos

   3/5/2010    22,336            
    3/3/2011         24,410       
    11/7/2011(a)  18,992            
    11/7/2011         103,550       
    3/8/2012              41,009  

Aris C. Chicles

   3/5/2010    7,539            
    3/3/2011         8,771       
    11/7/2011(a)  6,827            
    11/7/2011         31,065       
    3/8/2012              9,211  

Thomas M. Scalera

   3/5/2010    2,046            
    3/3/2011         2,288       
    11/7/2011(a)  1,781            
    11/7/2011         17,086       
    3/8/2012              8,772  

Robert J. Pagano, Jr.

   3/10/2008    9,216            
    3/5/2010    7,351            
    3/3/2011         6,103       
    11/7/2011(a)  4,747            
    11/7/2011         14,793       
    3/8/2012              5,848  

Luca Savi

   3/8/2012              4,006  

William E. Taylor

   3/5/2010    5,583            
    3/3/2011         4,576       
    11/7/2011(a)  3,561            
    11/7/2011         11,095       
    3/8/2012              4,883  

(a)
(3)Reflects RSUs granted in recognitionthe Company’s closing stock price of the uncompleted portion of the 2011-2013 TSR Award Period, which will vest$36.32 on December 31, 2013.2015.



52



Option Exercises and Stock Vested in 20122015

The following table provides information regarding the values realized by our NEOs upon the exercise of stock options and the vesting of stock awards.

    Option Awards   Stock Awards 
Name  

Number of Shares

Acquired on
Exercise

(#)

   

Value Realized on

Exercise

($)

   

Number of Shares

Acquired on

Vesting(1)(#)

   

Value Realized on

Vesting(2)($)

 

Denise L. Ramos

             25,449     600,851  

Aris C. Chicles

   42,978     345,456     9,543     225,310  

Thomas M. Scalera

             2,357     55,649  

Robert J. Pagano, Jr.

   152,740     1,095,570     18,213     422,456  

Luca Savi

                    

Thomas F. Korber

                    

William E. Taylor

   29,018     115,804     6,363     150,230  

RSU Awards. In 2010, the Compensation Committee awarded restricted stock awards. Beginningawards in 2011, and continuing in 2012, the Compensation Committee elected to award RSUs, which are settled in shares upon vesting. The Compensation Committee decided to award RSUs rather than restricted stock in 2011 because RSU awards provide consistent tax treatment for domestic and international employees. RSUs granted to international employees are settled in cash rather than shares, again for local income tax purposes. RSUs provide the same economic risk or reward as restricted stock, but recipients do not have voting rights and do not receive cash dividends during the restriction period. Dividend equivalents are accrued and paid in cash upon vesting of the RSUs.2015.

The Company’s

 Option Awards Stock Awards
Named Executive Officer# of Shares Acquired on ExerciseValue Realized on Exercise # of Shares Acquired on VestingValue Realized on Vesting
Denise L. Ramos71,590 $1,521,130
 41,009 $1,683,419
Thomas M. Scalera8,868 252,515
 8,772 360,090
Aris C. Chicles 
 9,211 378,111
Luca Savi(1)
 
  
Victoria Creamer 
  
(1)Mr. Savi’s 2012 RSU award of 4,006 shares which vested in 2015 was settled in cash rather than shares.
2015 Pension Benefits

Effective on October 31, 2011, all of the Company’s pension benefits described in this section were frozen, and the cumulative liability of these benefits was assumed by Exelis. All NEOs, with the exception ofExelis Inc. Ms. Ramos, Mr. Savi,Scalera and Mr. Chicles participated in the plans described below, and remain eligible for frozen pension benefits under these plans.

the ITT Salaried Retirement Plan.

ITT Salaried Retirement Plan.    Under the ITT Salaried Retirement Plan, participants had the option, on an annual basis, to elect to be covered under either a Traditional Pension Plan or a Pension Equity Plan formula for future pension accruals. The ITT Salaried Retirement Plan was a funded and tax-qualified retirement program. The plan is described in detail below.

While the Traditional Pension Plan formula paid benefits on a monthly basis after retirement, the Pension Equity Plan formula enabled participants to elect to have benefits paid as a single sum payment upon employment termination, regardless of the participant’s age. The Traditional Pension Plan benefit payable to an employee depended upon the date an employee first became a participant under the plan.

Traditional Pension Plan

A participant first employed prior to January 1, 2000, under the Traditional Pension Plan would receive an annual pension that would be the total of:

Ÿ

2% of his or her “average final compensation” (as described below) for each of the first 25 years of benefit service, plus

Ÿ

1.5% of his or her average final compensation for each of the next 15 years of benefit service, reduced by

Ÿ

1.25% of his or her primary Social Security benefit for each year of benefit service up to a maximum of 40 years.

2% of his or her “average final compensation” (as defined below) for each of the first 25 years of benefit service, plus
1.5% of his or her average final compensation for each of the next 15 years of benefit service, reduced by
1.25% of his or her primary Social Security benefit for each year of benefit service up to a maximum of 40 years.
A participant first employed on or after January 1, 2000, under the Traditional Pension Plan would receive an annual pension that would equal:

Ÿ

1.5% of his or her average final compensation (as defined below) for each year of benefit service up to 40 years, reduced by

Ÿ

1.25% of his or her primary Social Security benefit for each year of benefit service up to a maximum of 40 years.

1.5% of his or her average final compensation for each year of benefit service up to 40 years, reduced by
1.25% of his or her primary Social Security benefit for each year of benefit service up to a maximum of 40 years.
For a participant first employed prior to January 1, 2005, average final compensation (including salary and approved bonus or AIP payments)awards) is the total of:

Ÿ

The participant’s average annual base salary for the five calendar years of the last 120 consecutive calendar months of eligibility service that would result in the highest average annual base salary amount, plus

Ÿ

The participant’s average annual pension eligible compensation, not including base salary, for the five calendar years of the participant’s last 120 consecutive calendar months of eligibility service that would result in the highest average annual compensation amount.

The participant’s average annual base salary for the five calendar years of the last 120 consecutive calendar months of eligibility service that would result in the highest average annual base salary amount, plus
The participant’s average annual pension eligible compensation, not including base salary, for the five calendar years of the participant’s last 120 consecutive calendar months of eligibility service that would result in the highest average annual compensation amount.
For a participant first employed on or after January 1, 2005, average final compensation wasis the average of the participant’s total pension eligible compensation (salary, bonus and annual incentive payments for NEOs and other exempt salaried employees) over the highest five consecutive calendar years of the participant’s final 120 months of eligibility service.

As it applies to participants first employed prior to January 1, 2000, under the Traditional Pension Plan, Standard Early Retirement is available to employees at least 55 years of age with 10 years of eligibility service. Special Early Retirement is available to employees at least age 55 with 15 years of eligibility service or at least age 50 whose age plus total eligibility service equals at least 80. For Standard Early Retirement, if payments begin before age 65, payments from anticipated payments at the normal retirement age of 65 (the “Normal Retirement Age”) are reduced by one fourthone-fourth of one percent for each


53



month that payments commence prior to the Normal Retirement Age. For Special Early Retirement, if payments begin between ages 60-64, benefits will be payable at 100%. If payments begin prior to age 60, they are reduced by five twelfthsfive-twelfths of one percent for each month that payments start before age 60 but not more than 25%.

For participants first employed from January 1, 2000 through December 31, 2004, under the Traditional Pension Plan, Standard Early Retirement was available as described above. Special Early Retirement was also available to employees who attained at least age 55 with 15 years of eligibility service (but not earlier than age 55). For Special Early Retirement, the benefit payable at or after age 62 would be at 100%; if payments commenced prior to age 62 they would be reduced by five twelfthsfive-twelfths of one percent for each of the first 48 months prior to age 62 and by an additional four twelfths of one percent for each of the next 12 months and by an additional three twelfthsthree-twelfths of one percent for each month prior to age 57.

For participants first employed on or after January 1, 2005, and who retire before age 65, benefits may commence at or after age 55 but they would be reduced by five ninths of one percent for each of the first 60 months prior to age 65 and an additional five eighteenths of one percent for each month prior to age 60.

Pension Equity Plan

A participant under the Pension Equity Plan would receive a single sum pension that would equal the total accumulated percentage (as described below) times final average compensation (as defined above).

Total accumulated percentage is the sum of annual percentages earned for each year of benefit service. The percentage earned for any given year of benefit service ranges from three percent to six percent based on age:

Ÿ

Under age 30: three percent per year of benefit service

Ÿ

Age 30 to age 39: four percent per year of benefit service

Ÿ

Age 40 to age 49: five percent per year of benefit service

Ÿ

Age 50 and over: six percent per year of benefit service

Under age 30: 3% per year of benefit service
Age 30 to age 39: 4% per year of benefit service
Age 40 to age 49: 5% per year of benefit service
Age 50 and over: 6% per year of benefit service
In December 2007, effective January 1, 2008, the ITT Salaried Retirement Plan and the ITT Excess Pension PlansPlan were amended to provide for a three-year vesting requirement. In addition, for employees who were already vested and who were involuntarily terminated and entitled to severance payments from the Company, additional months of age and service (not to exceed 24 months) were to be imputed based on the employee’s actual service to his or her last day worked, solely for purposes of determining eligibility for early retirement.

The 20122015 Pension Benefits table provides information on the pension benefits for the NEOs. Mr. Pagano participated under the terms of the plan in effect for employees hired prior to January, 1 2000. Ms. Ramos, Mr. Scalera and Messrs.Mr. Chicles and Scalera participated under the terms of the plan in effect for employees hired after January 1, 2005. The Traditional Pension Plan accumulated benefit an employee earned over his or her career with the Company is payable on a monthly basis starting after retirement. Employees may retire as early as age 50 under the terms of the plan. Pensions may be reduced if retirement starts before age 65. Possible pension reductions are described above. The Pension Equity Plan benefit can be received as a lump sum or an annuity following termination. Mr. Scalera participated in the Pension Equity Plan formula prior to 2011. All of the other NEOsMs. Ramos and Mr. Chicles have always participated only under the Traditional Pension Plan formula, except Mr. Savi who is covered by benefits provided under the terms of the collective bargaining agreement covering managers within the industrial sector businesses. Mr. Savi participates in the Previndai Pension Fund under the National Collective Agreement for Industrial Sector Managers.

formula. Benefits under this plan are subject to the limitations imposed under Sections 415 and 401(a)(17) of the Internal Revenue Code in effect as of December 31, 2011. Section 415 limits the amount of annual pension payable from a qualified plan. For 2012,2015, this limit is $200,000$210,000 per year for a single-life annuity payable at an IRS-prescribed retirement age. This ceiling may be actuarially adjusted in accordance with IRS rules for items such as employee contributions, other forms of distribution and different annuity starting dates. Section 401(a)(17) limits the amount of compensation that may be recognized in the determination of a benefit under a qualified plan. For 2012,2015, this limit is $250,000.

$265,000.

ITT Excess Pension Plan.    Since federal law limits the amount of benefits paid under and the amount of compensation recognized under tax-qualified retirement plans, the Company maintained the unfunded ITT Excess Pension Plan, which is not qualified for tax purposes, until the date of the Spin Transaction date.Transaction. The purpose of the ITT Excess Pension Plan was to restore benefits calculated under the ITT Salaried Retirement Plan formula that cannot be paid because of the IRS limitations noted above. The Company did not grant any extra years of benefit service to any employee under either the ITT Salaried Retirement Plan or the ITT Excess Pension Plan.

No

On June 1, 2015, participants in the ITT Excess Pension Plan received a payout of their pension benefits were paid to anybenefits. The termination of the other named executivespension plan was a result of the Harris Corporation acquisition of Exelis. The payments to NEOs are shown in the last fiscal year.

table below.



54



20122015 Pension Benefits(1)Benefits Table

Name  Plan Name  

Number of

Years Credit

Service (#)

   Present Value of
Accumulated
Benefit at
Earliest Date for
Unreduced
Benefit
   Payments
During Last
Fiscal Year
($)
 

Denise L. Ramos

  ITT Salaried Retirement Plan   4.33    $133,355    $0  
   ITT Excess Pension Plan   4.33    $589,878    $0  

Aris C. Chicles

  ITT Salaried Retirement Plan   5.42    $126,977    $0  
   ITT Excess Pension Plan   5.42    $234,717    $0  

Thomas M. Scalera

  ITT Salaried Retirement Plan   5.77    $39,412    $0  
   ITT Excess Pension Plan   5.77    $31,492    $0  

Robert J. Pagano, Jr.(2)

  ITT Salaried Retirement Plan   22.08    $883,187    $0  
   ITT Excess Pension Plan   13.25    $944,107    $0  

Luca Savi

  ITT Salaried Retirement Plan   0.0    $0    $0  
   ITT Excess Pension Plan   0.0    $0    $0  

Thomas F. Korber

  ITT Salaried Retirement Plan   0.0    $0    $0  
   ITT Excess Pension Plan   0.0    $0    $0  

William E. Taylor

  ITT Salaried Retirement Plan   8.79    $291,868    $0  
   ITT Excess Pension Plan   8.79    $356,391    $0  

Named Executive OfficerPlan NameNumber of Years Credit Service (#)Present Value of Accumulated Benefit at Earliest Date for Unreduced BenefitPayments During Last Fiscal Year
Denise L. RamosITT Salaried Retirement Plan4.33 $154,572
  $
 
 ITT Excess Pension Plan4.33 
  895,566
 
Thomas M. Scalera(1)
ITT Salaried Retirement Plan5.77 43,729
  
 
 ITT Excess Pension Plan5.77 
  44,521
 
Aris C. ChiclesITT Salaried Retirement Plan5.42 146,963
  
 
 ITT Excess Pension Plan5.42 
  387,494
 
Luca Savi(2)
ITT Salaried Retirement Plan 
  
 
 ITT Excess Pension Plan 
  
 
Victoria Creamer(2)
ITT Salaried Retirement Plan 
  
 
 ITT Excess Pension Plan 
  
 
(1)AllMr. Scalera has an accrued benefit obligations for plans shown in this table were transferred to Exelis Inc. as of October 31, 2011. Accordingly, all benefitsunder both the Traditional Pension Plan formula and the Pension Equity Plan formula. His lump sum Pension Equity Plan benefit is $49,739 under the ITT Salaried Retirement Plan and the ITT Excess Pension Planas of December 31, 2015.
(2)Ms. Creamer was hired after October 31, 2011, are payable by Exelis Inc.the date on which the plans were frozen. Mr. Savi receives separate retirement benefits associated with status as an Italian citizen.

Assumptions used to determine present value as of December 31, 2012,2015, are as follows and are generally consistent with those used by Exelis Inc. for 20122015 financial statement reporting purposes:

Ÿ

Measurement date: December 31, 2012

Ÿ

Discount Rate: 4.09%

Ÿ

Mortality (pre-commencement): None

Ÿ

Mortality (post-commencement): 2012 PPA Annuitant Mortality Table, separate rates for males and females;

Ÿ

Normal retirement date: age 65

Ÿ

Earliest age at which a participant first employed prior to January 1, 2000 may receive unreduced benefits: age 60

Ÿ

Assumed benefit commencement date: age 60 for Mr. Pagano and 65 for all other NEOs

Ÿ

Accumulated benefit is calculated based on credited service and pay as of October 31, 2011

Ÿ

Measurement date: December 31, 2015
Discount Rate: 4.3%
Mortality (pre-commencement): None
Mortality (post-commencement): RP-2014 Annuitant Mortality Table, separate rates for males and females
Normal retirement date: age 65
Unreduced retirement date: age 65 for all other NEOs
Assumed benefit commencement date: 65 for all other NEOs
Accumulated benefit is calculated based on credited service and pay as of October 31, 2011
For benefits under the Traditional Pension Plan formula, present value is based on the single life annuity payable at assumed benefit commencement date.
For benefits under the Pension Equity Plan formula, present value is based on projected lump sum value at assumed benefit commencement date; Pension Equity Plan (“TPP”) formula, present value is based on the single life annuity payable at assumed benefit commencement date

Ÿ

For benefits under the Pension Equity Plan(“PEP”) formula, present value is based on projected lump sum value at assumed benefit commencement date; PEP value is projected from October 31, 2011, to age 65 using an interest crediting rate of 1.55% for the ITT Salaried Retirement Plan and 3.25% for the ITT Excess Pension Plan

Ÿ

The six-month delay under the Pension Plan as required under Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code was disregarded for this purpose

Ÿ

All results shown are estimates only; actual benefits will be based on precise credited service and compensation history, which will be determined at benefit commencement date.

The 2012 row of the column titled Change in Pension Plan Value & Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings in the Summary Compensation Table quantifies the change in the present value of the Pension Plan benefit from December 31, 2011,2015, to December 31, 2012. To determineage 65 using an interest crediting rate of 1.55% for the present value of the planITT Salaried Retirement Plan.

All results shown are estimates only; actual benefits will be based on precise credited service and compensation history, which will be determined at benefit as of December 31, 2011, the same assumptions that are described above to determine present value as of December 31, 2012, were used, except the following:

Ÿ

Discount rate: 4.09%

Ÿ

Mortality (post commencement): UP-94 Mortality Table projected 16 years with Scale AA

Ÿ

PEP value is projected from December 31, 2011 to age 65 using an interest crediting rate of 1.55% for both the ITT Salaried Retirement Plan and the ITT Excess Pension Plan

(2)Mr. Pagano became a participant in the ITT Salaried Retirement Plan as of December 1, 1998, following the ITT acquisition of Goulds Pumps Inc. (“Goulds”). Mr. Pagano’s services are calculated under the Goulds Retirement Plan provisions and such services are treated as a former benefit plan under the ITT Salaried Retirement Plan. Accordingly, the years of credited service for Mr. Pagano include 8.83 years of service accrued as an employee of Goulds. The Goulds plan did not provide benefits in excess of the IRS limits.

commencement date.




55

ITT


2015 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan

ITT Deferred Compensation Plan.    The ITT Deferred Compensation Plan is a tax deferral plan. The ITT Deferred Compensation Plan permits eligible executivesemployees with a base salary of at least $200,000 to defer between 2% and 90% of their AIP payment. The AIP amount deferred is included in the Summary Compensation Table under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation. Withdrawals under the plan are available on payment dates elected by participants at the time of the deferral election. The withdrawal election is irrevocable except in cases of demonstrated hardship due to an unforeseeable emergency as provided by the ITT Deferred Compensation Plan. Amounts deferred will be unsecured general obligations of the Company to pay the deferred compensation in the future and will rank with other unsecured and unsubordinated indebtedness of the Company.

Participants can elect to have their account balances allocated into one or more of the 2521 phantom investment funds (including a phantom Company stock fund) and can change their investment allocations on a daily basis. All plan accounts are maintained on the accounts of the Company and investment earnings are credited to a participant’s account (and charged to corporate earnings) to mirror the investment returns achieved by the investment funds chosen by that participant.

A participant can establish up to six “accounts” into which AIP paymentaward deferrals are credited and he or she can elect a different form of payment and a different payment commencement date for each “account.” One account may be selected based on a termination date (the “Termination Account”) and five accounts are based on employee-specified dates (each a “Special Purpose Account”). Each Special Purpose and Termination Account may have different investment and payment options. Termination Accounts will be paid in the seventh month following the last day worked. Changes to Special Purpose Account distribution elections must be made at least 12 months before any existing benefit payment date, may not take effect for at least 12 months, and must postpone the existing benefit payment date by at least five years. Additionally, Termination Account distribution elections are irrevocable.

The table below shows the annual rate of return for the funds available under the ITT Deferred Compensation Plan, as reported by the administrator for the calendar year ended December 31, 2015.
Name of FundRate of Return 1/1/15 to 12/31/15Name of FundRate of Return 1/1/15 to 12/31/15
Fixed Rate Option(1)
4.00%American Funds EuroPacific Growth (REREX)(0.82)%
PIMCO Total Return Institutional (PTTRX)0.72%First Eagle Overseas A (SGOVX)2.27%
PIMCO Real Return Institutional (PRRIX)(2.83)%Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Open (LZOEX)(20.33)%
T Rowe Price High Yield (PRHYX)(3.26)%Invesco Global Real Estate A(1.61)%
Dodge & Cox Stock (DODGX)(4.49)%
Model Portfolio(2) - Conservative
(0.15)%
Vanguard 500 Index (VFINX)1.25%
Model Portfolio(2) - Moderate Conservative
(0.93)%
American Funds Growth Fund of America R4 (RGAEX)5.34%
Model Portfolio(2) - Moderate
(1.23)%
Artisan Mid Cap (ARTMX)2.17%
Model Portfolio(2) - Moderate Aggressive
(1.58)%
American Century Small Cap Value (ASVIX)(2.67)%
Model Portfolio(2) - Aggressive
(1.71)%
Harbor International (HIINX)(4.16)%ITT Corporation Stock Fund (ITT)(9.13)%
Vanguard Total Bond Market Index (VBMFX)0.30%  
(1)The Fixed Rate Option rate is based on guaranteed contractual returns from the insurance company provider.
(2)The returns shown in the model portfolio are not subsidized by the Company, but represent returns for a managed portfolio based on funds available to deferred compensation participants.


56



ITT Corporation Supplemental Retirement Savings Plan for Salaried Employees.Plan.    Since federal law limits the amount of compensation that can be used to determine employee and employer contribution amounts to $250,000 in 2012 to the tax-qualified plan to $265,000 in 2015, the Company has established and maintains a

non-qualified unfunded ITT Corporation Supplemental Retirement Savings Plan for Salaried Employees to allow for employee and Company contributions based on base salary and actual annual bonus paid in excess of these limits. Employee contributions under this plan were limited to six percent of base salary. All balances under this plan are maintained on the books of the Company and earnings are credited to the accumulated savings under the plan based on the earnings in the Stable Value Fund in the tax-qualified plan. Benefits will be paid in a lump sum in the seventh month following the last day worked.

Effective January 1, 2012, the plan was amended to no longer permit employee contributions.

2015 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation.    Non-qualified savingsCompensation Table
The table below shows the Nonqualified Deferred Compensation activity for the NEOs for 2015.
Name
Executive Contributions Last Fiscal Year(1)
Registrant Contributions Last Fiscal Year(2)
Aggregate Earnings Last Fiscal Year(3)
Aggregate Withdrawals/DistributionsAggregate Balance at Last Fiscal Year End
Denise L. Ramos          
Non-qualified savings $
 $188,931
 $9,237
 $
 $642,258
Deferred Compensation 
 
 139,318
 
 3,650,552
Total 
 188,931
 148,555
 
 4,292,810
Thomas M. Scalera          
Non-qualified savings 
 43,442
 1,801
 
 139,045
Deferred Compensation 
 
 
 
 
Total 
 43,442
 1,801
 
 139,045
Aris C. Chicles          
Non-qualified savings 
 36,456
 3,022
 
 241,197
Deferred Compensation 
 
 
 
 
Total 
 36,456
 3,022
 
 241,197
Luca Savi          
Non-qualified savings 
 
 
 
 
Deferred Compensation 
 
 
 
 
Total 
 
 
 
 
Victoria Creamer          
Non-qualified savings 
 17,519
 3
 
 17,522
Deferred Compensation 
 
 
 
 
Total 
 17,519
 3
 
 17,522
Note:    “Non-qualified savings” represent amounts in the ITT Corporation Supplemental Retirement Savings Plan for Salaried Employees. Deferred CompensationPlan. “Deferred Compensation” earnings under the ITT Deferred Compensation Plan are calculated by reference to actual earnings of mutualthe investment funds or the Company’s stock as provided in the accompanying chart.

2012 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation

The table below shows the activity within the Deferred Compensation Plan for the NEOs for 2012.

Name(a)

 

Executive
Contributions
Last Fiscal
Year

($)(1)(b)

  

Registrant
Contributions
Last Fiscal
Year

($)(2)(c)

  

Aggregate
Earnings
Last
Fiscal
Year

($)(d)

  Aggregate
Withdrawals/
Distributions
($)(e)
  

Aggregate
Balance
at
Last
Fiscal
Year End

($)(3)(f)

 

Denise L. Ramos

           

Non-qualified savings

  1,962    96,183    1,271        225,699  

Deferred compensation

          72,729        1,394,985  

Total

  1,962    96,183    74,000        1,620,684  

Aris C. Chicles

        

Non-qualified savings

  25,063    18,787    1,194        94,195  

Deferred compensation

                    

Total

  25,063    18,787    1,194        94,195  

Thomas M. Scalera

                    

Non-qualified savings

  8,769    8,769    49        17,637  

Deferred compensation

                    

Total

  8,769    8,769    49        17,637  

Robert J. Pagano, Jr.

        

Non-qualified savings

  923    24,615    1,597        114,340  

Deferred compensation

  70,385    8,446    23,166        443,895  

Total

  71,308    33,061    24,763        558,235  

Luca Savi

                    

Non-qualified savings

                    

Deferred compensation

                    

Total

                    

Thomas F. Korber

        

Non-qualified savings

      25,280    229        29,510  

Deferred compensation

                    

Total

      25,280    229        29,510  

William E. Taylor

                    

Non-qualified savings

      15,239    329        31,209  

Deferred compensation

          6,449        123,693  

Total

      15,239    6,778        154,902  

above.
(1)The amount for Executive Contributions Last Fiscal Year for Ms. Ramos representsNone of the deferred portion of her 2012 AIP payment,NEOs elected to defer their 2015 annual bonus that was paid in March 2016.
(2)Amounts represent the total of which was includedcore, match and applicable transition employer contributions into the ITT Corporation Supplemental Retirement Savings Plan (Non-qualified savings) and the ITT Deferred Compensation Plan (Deferred Compensation).
(3)As noted in the Summary Compensation Table, the fixed rate investment option in this Proxy Statement.the ITT Deferred Compensation Plan was set at 4.0% for 2015. The Aggregate Balance at Last Fiscal Year-End was adjusted to reflect this deferral, which took place in March 2013.

(2)The amounts in column (c) non-qualified savings are also reflected in column (g)rate exceeded the Applicable Federal Long-term Rate of 3.29% by 0.71 percentage points and Ms. Ramos received $24,729 as a result of the All Other Compensation Table as the ITT Supplemental Retirement Savings Plan for Salaried Employees Match and Core and includedearnings in the All Other Compensation columnexcess of the Summary Compensation Table.

(3)AFR. The amounts in column (f) include Executive Contributions in the last fiscal year, and the deferred portionrate of the earned 2012 AIP, which amounts were credited to the executives’ accounts in 2012 and reported in the Summary Compensation Table in this Proxy Statement. Registrant Contributions in the Last Fiscal Year for Non-qualified savings for all NEOs are included in the All Other Compensation Table and the Summary Compensation Table.

The table below shows the funds available under the ITT Deferred Compensation Plan, as reported by the administrator, and their annual rate of return for the calendar year ended December 31, 2012.

Name of Fund Rate of
Return
1/1/12 to
12/31/12
  Name of Fund Rate of
Return
1/1/12 to
12/31/12
 

Fixed Rate Option(1)

  5.50   Vanguard Developed Markets Index (VDMIX)  18.83  

PIMCO Total Return Institutional (PTTRX)

  10.35   Artio International Equity A (BJBIX)  14.87  

PIMCO Real Return Institutional (PRRIX)

  9.26   American Funds EuroPacific Growth (REREX)  19.22  

T Rowe Price High Yield (PRHYX)

  15.24   First Eagle Overseas A (SGOVX)  13.98  

Dodge & Cox Stock (DODGX)

  22.01   Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Open (LZOEX)  22.03  

Vanguard 500 Index (VFINX)

  15.82   Invesco Global Real Estate A  27.75  

American Funds Growth Fund of America R4 (RGAEX)

  20.56   Model Portfolio* — Conservative  9.76  

Perkins Mid Cap Value (JMCVX)

  10.32   Model Portfolio* — Moderate Conservative  12.54  

Artisan Mid Cap (ARTMX)

  19.52   Model Portfolio* — Moderate  15.00  

American Century Small Cap Value (ASVIX)

  16.70   Model Portfolio* — Moderate Aggressive  16.48  

Perimeter Small Cap Growth (PSCGX)

  10.38   Model Portfolio* — Aggressive  18.34  

Harbor International (HIINX)

  20.41   ITT Corporation Stock Fund (ITT)  23.46  

Vanguard Total Bond Market Index (VBMFX)

  4.05        

(1)The Fixed Rate Option 5.50% rate4.0% is based on a guaranteed contractual returnsreturn from the insurance company provider.

*The returns shown in the model portfolio are not subsidized by the Company, but represent returns for a managed portfolio based on funds available to deferred compensation participants.



57

POST-EMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION

In 2012, Mr. Taylor reached a mutual agreement with the Company to end his employment. Following are the amounts paid to Mr. Taylor as a result of his retirement.

Salary for a period of 22.6 months

  $628,652  

Accrued but Untaken Vacation

  $26,335  

Additional Employee Benefits

  $188,595  

Additional vesting of RSUs

  $322,887  

Additional vesting of NQSOs

  $202,472  

Additional vesting of TSR Awards

  $98,779  
  

 

 

 

Total amount payable upon termination (paid through 7/19/14)

  $1,467,720  

In 2012, Mr. Korber reached a mutual agreement with the Company to end his employment. Following are the amounts paid to Mr. Korber as a result of his departure from the Company.

Salary for a period of 12 months

  $310,000  

Accrued but Untaken Vacation

  $23,846  

Additional Employee Benefits

  $93,000  

Additional vesting of RSUs

  $112,420  

Additional vesting of NQSOs

  $80,490  

Additional vesting of TSR Awards

  $82,807  

Relocation benefits payable

  $10,000  
  

 

 

 

Total amount payable upon termination (paid through 11/30/13)

  $712,563  

POTENTIAL POST-EMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION



Potential Post-Employment Compensation
The potential post-employment compensation tables reflect the amount of compensation payable to each of the NEOs named who continue to be employed by the Company in the event oftheir employment termination under several different circumstances,is terminated, including voluntary termination, termination for cause, death or disability, termination without cause or termination in connection with a change of control. Ms. Ramos, Mr. Scalera, Mr. Chicles and Messrs. Chicles, Scalera, and PaganoMs. Creamer are covered under the Senior Executive Severance Pay Plan or Special Senior Executive Change in Control Severance Pay Plan (applicable to situations involving a change of control) described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis under the heading “Post-Employment Compensation.”

Mr. Savi is an Italian employee and is covered by the National Collective Agreement for Industrial Sector Managers. This collective bargaining agreement provides for severance benefits in the eventCompensation—Change of termination of employment for other than cause.

Control Arrangements.”

The amounts shown in the potential post-employment compensation tables are estimates, (or the estimated present value of the ITT Excess Pension Plan which may be paid in continuing annuity payments), assuming that the triggering event was effective as of December 31, 2012,2015, including amounts that would be earned through such date (or that would be earned during a period of severance), and where applicable, are based on the closing price of the Company’s stock on December 31, 2012,2015, the last trading day of 2012,2015, which was $23.46.

$36.32.

The actual amounts to be paid out can only be determined at the time of such executive’s separation from the Company. For purposes of calculating the estimated potential payments to our officers under the ITT Excess Pension Plan, as reflected in the tables below, we have used the same assumptions described in the notes to the 2012 Pension Benefits table, except as noted in the footnotes.

Payments and Benefits Provided Generally to Salaried Employees.    The amounts shown in the tables in this section do not include payments and benefits to the extent these payments and benefits are provided on a non-discriminatory basis to salaried employees generally upon termination of employment. These include:

Ÿ

Accrued salary and vacation pay

Ÿ

Accrued salary and vacation pay.
Regular pension benefits under the ITT Salaried Retirement Plan (frozen as of the date of the Spin Transaction and transferred to Exelis Inc.). ITT participants do not accrue any additional service credit under the plan in the event of a termination. See the section “Elements of Compensation — Post-Employment Compensation” in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis for more information.

Ÿ

Pension benefits under the ITT Excess Pension Plan (frozen as of the date of the Spin Transaction and transferred to Exelis Inc.). The plan balances for the ITT Excess Pension Plan were shown as part of this analysis in previous years, but with the transfer of the plan

balances to Exelis Inc. in 2011, ITT participants do not accrue any additional service credit under the plan in the event of a termination. See the section “Elements of Compensation — Compensation—Post-Employment Compensation” in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis for more information.

Ÿ

Health care benefits provided to retirees under the ITT Salaried Retirement Plain, including retiree medical and dental insurance (if eligible as of the date of the Spin Transaction). Employees who terminate prior to retirement are eligible for continued benefits under COBRA.

Ÿ

Distributions of plan balances under the ITT Retirement Savings Plan for Salaried Employees and amounts currently vested under the ITT Supplemental Retirement Savings Plan for Salaried Employees.

Health care benefits provided to retirees under the ITT Salaried Retirement Plan, including retiree medical and dental insurance (if eligible as of the date of the Spin Transaction). Employees who terminate prior to retirement are eligible for continued benefits under COBRA.
Distributions of plan balances under the ITT Retirement Savings Plan and amounts currently vested under the ITT Corporation Supplemental Retirement Savings Plan.
No perquisites are available to any NEOs in any of the post-employment compensation circumstances. With respect to the ITT Salaried Retirement Plan, frozen benefits under such plan may be deferred to age 65, but may become payable at early retirement age, or earlier for benefits under the Pension Equity Plan formula. Employees of the Company do not have to terminate employment in order to receive their benefits from the ITT Salaried Retirement Plan since the plan is now sponsored by Exelis Inc. Benefits under the ITT Excess Pension Plan must commence as soon as possible following termination but generally would be payable seven months following such date, retroactive to the date the ITT Excess Pension Plan benefit became payable. Benefits for the ITT Excess Pension Plan will not generally be payable prior to termination.

Senior Executive Severance Pay Plan.    The Senior Executive Severance Pay Plan provides overall cash severance benefits to executives, provides participants with outplacement assistance for one year and does not allow for the vesting of equity awards during the severance period. The amount of severance pay under this plan depends on the executive’s base pay and years of service. Theservice and the amount will not exceed 2412 months of base pay or be greater than two times the executive’s total annual compensation during the year immediately preceding termination.pay. The Company considers these severance pay provisions appropriate transitional provisions given the job responsibilities and competitive market in which senior executives function.

No severance is provided for termination for cause, because the Company believes employees terminated for cause should not receive additional compensation. No severance is provided in the case of termination after a normal retirement date because the executive will be eligible for retirement payments. No severance is provided when an executive accepts or refuses comparable employment because the executive has the opportunity to receive employment income from another party under comparable circumstances.

In addition, the Company’s obligation to continue severance payments stops if the executive does not comply with the Company’s Code of Corporate Conduct. We consider this cessation provision to be critical to the Company’s emphasis on ethical behavior. The Company’s obligation to continue severance payments also stops if the executive does not comply with non-competition provisions of the ITT Severance Policy or Senior Executive Severance Pay Plan. These provisions protect the integrity of our businesses and are consistent with typical commercial arrangements. Mr. Scalera, Mr. Chicles and Ms. Ramos and Messrs. Chicles, Scalera and PaganoCreamer are covered under this plan.

If a covered executive receives or is entitled to receive other compensation from another company, the amount of that other compensation could be used to offset amounts otherwise payable under the ITT Senior Executive Severance Pay Plan. During the severance payment period, the executive will have a limited right to continue to be eligible for participation in certain benefit plans. Severance pay will start within 60 days following the covered executive’s scheduled termination date.



58



Special Ms. Ramos.    Under the terms of Ms. Ramos’ employment agreement, should Ms. Ramos be terminated by the Company other than for cause, Ms. Ramos is entitled to a severance benefit in an amount equal to two times the sum of her then-current base salary and target annual incentive. The information under the heading “CEO Compensation and Employment Agreement” and the Potential Post-Employment Compensation table for Ms. Ramos below provides additional information.
Senior Executive Change in Control Severance Pay Plan.    This plan provides two levels of benefits for covered executives, based on their position within the Company. The Compensation and Personnel Committee considered two levels of benefits appropriate based on the relative ability of each level of employee to influence future Company performance. (SeniorExecutive Vice Presidents and Senior Vice Presidents receive the higher level and certain Vice Presidents the second level).level. Under the Special Senior Executive Change in Control Severance Pay Plan, if a covered

executive is terminated within two years of a change ofin control or in contemplation of a change ofin control event that ultimately occurs or if the covered executive terminates his or her employment for good reason within two years of a change ofin control, he or she would be entitled to:

Ÿ

Any accrued but unpaid base salary, bonus (AIP payment)

Any accrued but unpaid base salary, bonus (AIP award), unreimbursed expenses and employee benefits, including vacation

Ÿ

Two or three times the current base salary and target annual incentive as of the termination date

Ÿ

Continuation of health and life insurance benefits at the same levels for two or three years

Ÿ

A lump sum payment equal to two or three times the highest annual base salary rate during the three years preceding termination or an acceleration event times the highest percentage rate of the Company’s contributions to the ITT Salaried Investment and Savings Plan and the ITT Supplemental Savings Plan for Salaried Employees, such payment not to exceed 3.5% per year

Ÿ

One year of outplacement

Ms. Ramos and Messrs. Chicles, Scalera,employee benefits, including vacation;

Two or three times the current base salary and Paganotarget annual incentive as of the termination date;
A lump sum payment equal to two or three times the highest annual base salary rate during the three years preceding termination or an acceleration event times the highest percentage rate of the Company’s contributions to the ITT Retirement Savings Plan and the ITT Corporation Supplemental Retirement Savings Plan, such percentage rate not to exceed 7% per year; and
One year of outplacement assistance.
All of the NEOs are all covered at the highest level of benefits. Ms. Ramos is entitledIn 2014, the Company made certain changes to a cash payment upon severance, as described on elsewherethe plan in this Proxy Statementorder to further clarify eligibility and coverage under the heading “CEO Compensationplan and Employment Agreements,” which payment may be delayed, if required by Section 409A.

Ms. Ramos.    Under Ms. Ramos’ termsto conform certain practices across all of employment, should Ms. Ramos be terminated by the Company other than for cause, Ms. Ramos is entitled to a severance benefit equal to twenty-four months of base salary and target AIP award, subject to the Company’s severance policies.

The Potential Post-Employment Compensation tables provide additional information.

plans.

Change in Control Arrangements

The payment or vesting of awards or benefits under eachcertain of the plans listed below would beare accelerated solely upon the occurrence of a change ofin control of the Company. The reasons for the change ofin control provisions in these plans are to put the executive in the same position he or she would have been in had the change ofin control not occurred. Executives then can focus on preserving value for shareholders when evaluating situations that, without change ofin control provisions, could be personally adverse to the executive. There would be
The following Company plans have change in control provisions:
2011 PlanITT Corporation Change in Control Severance Pay Plan
2003 Equity Incentive PlanDeferred Compensation Plan
ITT Annual Incentive Plan for Executive OfficersITT Corporation Supplemental Retirement Savings Plan
Senior Executive Change in Control Severance Pay PlanRamos Employment Agreement
The 2011 Plan, 2003 Equity Incentive Plan, ITT Annual Incentive Plan for Executive Officers, Senior Executive Change in Control Severance Pay Plan and ITT Corporation Change in Control Severance Pay Plan consider a change ofin control of the Companyto have occurred if one of the following acceleration events occurred:

1. occurs:

1.A report on Schedule 13D was filed with the SEC disclosing that any person, other than the Company or one of its subsidiaries or any employee benefit plan that is sponsored by the Company or a subsidiary, had become the beneficial owner of 20% or more of the Company’s outstanding stock.
2.A person other than the Company or one of its subsidiaries or any employee benefit plan that is sponsored by the Company or a subsidiary purchased the Company’s shares in connection with a tender or exchange offer, if after consummation of the offer the person purchasing the shares is the beneficial owner of 20% or more of the Company’s outstanding stock.
3.The shareholders of the Company approved, and the Company fully executed:
(a)Any consolidation, business combination or merger of the Company other than a consolidation, business combination or merger in which the shareholders of the Company immediately prior to the merger would hold 50% or more of the combined voting power of the Company or the surviving corporation of the merger and would have the same proportionate ownership of common stock of the surviving corporation that they held in the Company immediately prior to the merger; or
(b)Any sale, lease, exchange or other transfer of all or substantially all of the assets of the Company.


59



4.A majority of the members of the Board of Directors of the Company changed within a 12-month period, unless the election or nomination for election of each of the new Directors by the Company’s shareholders had been approved by two-thirds of the Directors still in office who had been Directors at the beginning of the 12-month period or whose nomination for election or election was recommended or approved by a majority of Directors who were Directors at the beginning of the 12-month period.
5.Any person other than the Company or one of its subsidiaries or any employee benefit plan sponsored by the Company or a subsidiary became the beneficial owner of 20% or more of the Company’s outstanding stock.
The ITT Corporation Supplemental Retirement Savings Plan and Deferred Compensation Plan consider a change in control to have occurred if one of the following acceleration events occurs:
1.A majority of the members of the Board of Directors of the Company changed within a 12-month period, unless the election or nomination for election of each of the new Directors by the Company’s shareholders had been approved by two-thirds of the Directors still in office who had been Directors at the beginning of the 12-month period or whose nomination for election or election was recommended or approved by a majority of Directors who were Directors at the beginning of the 12-month period.
2.Any one person, or more than one person acting as a group (as defined in Treasury Regs. 1.409A-2(i)(5)(v)(B)), acquires ownership of shares that, together with shares held by such person or group constitutes more than 50% of the total fair market value or total voting power of the shares of the Corporation.
3.Either (i) a person, or more than one person acting as a group (as defined in Treasury Regs. 1.409A-2(i)(5)(v)(B)), acquires ownership of shares possessing 30% or more of the total voting power of the shares of the Corporation, taking into account all such shares acquired during the 12-month period ending on the date of the most recent acquisition, or (ii) a majority of the members of the Board of Directors is replaced during any 12-month period by directors whose appointment or election is not endorsed by a majority of the members of such Board of Directors prior to the date of the appointment or election, but only if no other corporation is a majority shareholder.
4.A change in the ownership of a substantial portion of assets occurs on the date on which any one person, or more than one person acting as a group (as defined in Treasury Regs. 1.409A-2(i)(5)(v)(B)), other than a person or group of persons that is related to the Corporation, acquires assets that have a total gross fair market value equal to or more than 40% of the total gross fair market value of all of the assets of the Corporation immediately prior to such acquisition or acquisitions, taking into account all such assets acquired during the 12-month period ending on the date of the most recent acquisition.
Beginning with the SEC disclosing that any person, other than the Company or one of its subsidiaries or any employee benefit plan that is sponsored by the Company orCompany’s annual grant cycle in March 2014, all long-term incentive awards (performance units, RSUs and stock options) have included a subsidiary, had become the beneficial owner of 20% or more of the Company’s outstanding stock.

2. A person other than the Company or one of its subsidiaries or any employee benefit plan that is sponsored by the Company or a subsidiary purchased the Company’s shares in connection with a tender or exchange offer, if after consummation of the offer the person purchasing the shares is the beneficial owner of 20% or more of the Company’s outstanding stock.

3. The shareholders of the Company approved, and the Company fully executed:

(a) Any consolidation, business combination or merger of the Company other than a consolidation, business combination or merger in which the shareholders of the Company immediately prior to the merger would hold 50% or more of the combined voting power of the Company or the surviving corporation of the merger and would have the same proportionate ownership of common stock of the surviving corporation that they held in the Company immediately prior to the merger; or

(b) Any sale, lease, exchange or other transfer of all or substantially all of the assets of the Company.

4. A majority of the members of the Board of Directors of the Company changed within a 12-month period, unless the election or nomination for election of each of the new Directors by the Company’s shareholders had been approved by two-thirds of the Directors still in office who had been Directors at the beginning of the 12-month period or whose nomination for election or election was recommended or approved by a majority of Directors who were Directors at the beginning of the 12-month period.

5. Any person other than the Company or one of its subsidiaries or any employee benefit plan sponsored by the Company or a subsidiary became the beneficial owner of 20% or more of the Company’s outstanding stock.

Pre-2005 awards and“double trigger” provision, whereby no benefits will be paid to an executive unless (i) a change in control of the Company has occurred and (ii) there has been a specified change in the employment status of the executive within a period of time following the change in control. For example, if a covered executive is terminated without cause within two years of a change in control or terminates his or her employment for good reason within two years of a change in control, or is terminated before the 20% threshold described above is reached. For awardschange in control occurs, but after its announcement or benefits earned since January 1, 2005, paymentat the request of awardsa participant, he or benefitsshe would be made ifentitled to the severance benefits provided pursuant to that plan, rather than being entitled to severance benefits solely due to the occurrence of a person other thanchange in control. This change reflects a best pay practice and provides competitive benefits in the Company, its subsidiaries or anyevent that an executive’s employment benefit plan sponsored by the Company becomes the beneficial owner of 30% or moreis terminated due to a change in control of the Company’s outstanding stock.

Company. The following Company plansSenior Executive Change in Control Severance Plan and ITT Corporation Change in Control Severance Pay Plan also have change of control provisions:

Ÿ

2011 Omnibus Incentive Plan (under the 2011 Omnibus Incentive Plan, a change of control requires consummation of the transactions described in 3(a) and (b) above);

Ÿ

2003 Equity Incentive Plan;

Ÿ

1994 Incentive Stock Plan;

Ÿ

1996 Restricted Stock Plan for Non-Employee Directors;

Ÿ

ITT Annual Incentive Plan for Executive Officers;

Ÿ

1997 Annual Incentive Plan;

Ÿ

1997 Long-Term Incentive Plan;

Ÿ

Special Senior Executive Severance Pay Plan;

Ÿ

Enhanced Severance Pay Plan;

Ÿ

Deferred Compensation Plan;

Ÿ

Supplemental Retirement Savings Plan for Salaried Employees; and

Ÿ

Ramos Letter Agreement.

double trigger provisions.

Potential post-employment compensation arrangements are more fully described for the NEOs in the following tables.

    Denise L. Ramos 
    Resignation 
($)
   Termination 
For Cause 
($)
   Death ($)   Disability
($)
   Termination
Not For Cause 
($)
   

Termination
Not For Cause 
or With Good
Reason

After Change
of Control

($)

 

Cash Severance (1)

                 

Salary

                       1,700,000     2,550,000  

AIP

                       1,700,000     2,550,000  

Total

                       3,400,000     5,100,000  

Unvested Equity
Awards (2)

                 

3/5/2010 Option Award

             249,849     249,849     249,849     249,849  

3/5/2010 Restricted Stock

             524,003     524,003     524,003     524,003  

3/3/2011 Option Award

             173,011     173,011     173,011     173,011  

3/3/2011 Restricted Stock

             572,659     572,659     572,659     572,659  

11/7/2011 Option Award

             641,498     641,498     641,498     641,498  

11/7/2011 Restricted Stock (3)

             2,429,283     2,429,283     2,429,283     2,429,283  

11/7/2011 Restricted Stock (4)

             445,552     445,552     445,552     445,552  

3/8/2012 Option Award

             89,826     89,826          89,826  

3/8/2012 Restricted Stock

             962,071     962,071     881,899     962,071  

2012-2014 TSR Award

        935,000     935,000     935,000     846,175  

Total

             7,022,752     7,022,752     6,852,753     6,933,927  

Non-Qualified Retirement Benefits

                 

ITT Excess Pension Plan (5)

                              

ITT Excess Savings Plan (6)

                            89,250  

Total

                            89,250  

Other Benefits

                 

Outplacement (7)

                       5,000     5,000  

Health and
Welfare (8)

                       30,944     46,416  

Total

                       35,944     51,416  

Total (9)

             7,022,752     7,022,752     10,288,697     12,174,593  

As noted above, these tables assume a triggering event as of December 31, 2015. Please see the discussion in “Potential Post-Employment Compensation—Senior Executive Severance Pay Plan,” regarding changes made in severance arrangements, which will affect the severance entitlements of the Named Executive Officers in the future.


60



Denise L. Ramos
 Resignation
Termination 
For Cause
DeathDisabilityTermination Not For CauseTermination Not For Cause or With Good Reason After Change of Control
Cash Severance(1)
            
Salary $
  $
 $
$
$2,000,000
 $3,000,000
 
AIP 
  
 

2,000,000
 3,000,000
 
Total 
  
 

4,000,000
 6,000,000
 
Unvested Equity Award(2)
            
3/5/2013 Option Award 
  
 1,006,620
1,006,620
1,006,620
 1,006,620
 
3/5/2013 Restricted Stock 
  
 951,766
951,766
951,766
 951,766
 
3/4/2014 Option Award 
  
 


 
 
3/4/2014 Restricted Stock 
  
 730,395
730,395
426,064
 730,395
 
2/25/2015 Option Award 
  
 


 
 
2/25/2015 Restricted Stock 
  
 929,610
929,610
258,225
 929,610
 
2014-2016 Performance Unit Award 
  
 1,506,190
1,506,190
1,004,127
 2,485,214
 
2015-2017 Performance Unit Award 
  
 1,923,870
1,923,870
641,290
 3,174,386
 
Total 
  
 7,048,451
7,048,451
4,288,092
 9,277,991
 
Non-Qualified Retirement Benefits            
ITT Excess Savings Plan(3)
 
  
 


 210,000
 
Total 
  
 


 210,000
 
Other Benefits            
Outplacement(4)
 
  
 

5,000
 5,000
 
Health and Welfare(5)
 
  
 

31,756
 48,821
 
Total 
  
 

36,756
 53,821
 
Total(6)
 $
  $
 $7,048,451
$7,048,451
$8,324,848
 $15,541,812
 



61



Thomas M. Scalera
 Resignation
Termination 
For Cause
DeathDisabilityTermination Not For CauseTermination Not For Cause or With Good Reason After Change of Control
Cash Severance(1)
            
Salary $
  $
 $
$
$475,000
 $1,425,000
 
AIP 
  
 


 1,068,750
 
Total 
  
 

475,000
 2,493,750
 
Unvested Equity Award(2)
            
3/5/2013 Option Award 
  
 219,641
219,641
219,641
 219,641
 
3/5/2013 Restricted Stock 
  
 207,641
207,641
207,641
 207,641
 
3/4/2014 Option Award 
  
 


 
 
3/4/2014 Restricted Stock 
  
 135,655
135,655
79,132
 135,655
 
2/25/2015 Option Award 
  
 


 
 
2/25/2015 Restricted Stock 
  
 350,125
350,125
97,257
 350,125
 
2014-2016 Performance Unit Award 
  
 279,846
279,846
186,564
 461,745
 
2015-2017 Performance Unit Award 
  
 362,292
362,292
120,764
 597,782
 
Total 
  
 1,555,200
1,555,200
910,999
 1,972,589
 
Non-Qualified Retirement Benefits            
ITT Excess Savings Plan(3)
 
  
 


 99,750
 
Total 
  
 


 99,750
 
Other Benefits            
Outplacement(4)
 
  
 

5,000
 5,000
 
Health and Welfare(5)
 
  
 

7,482
 7,482
 
Total 
  
 

12,482
 12,482
 
Total(6)
 $
  $
 $1,555,200
$1,555,200
$1,398,481
 $4,578,571
 


62



Aris C. Chicles
 Resignation
Termination 
For Cause
DeathDisabilityTermination Not For CauseTermination Not For Cause or With Good Reason After Change of Control
Cash Severance(1)
            
Salary $
  $
 $
$
$438,500
 $1,315,500
 
AIP 
  
 


 986,625
 
Total 
  
 

438,500
 2,302,125
 
Unvested Equity Award(2)
            
3/5/2013 Option Award 
  
 226,094
226,094
226,094
 226,094
 
3/5/2013 Restricted Stock 
  
 553,081
553,081
553,081
 553,081
 
3/4/2014 Option Award 
  
 


 
 
3/4/2014 Restricted Stock 
  
 135,655
135,655
79,132
 135,655
 
2/25/2015 Option Award 
  
 


 
 
2/25/2015 Restricted Stock 
  
 164,166
164,166
45,602
 164,166
 
2014-2016 Performance Unit Award 
  
 279,846
279,846
186,564
 461,745
 
2015-2017 Performance Unit Award 
  
 339,592
339,592
113,197
 560,327
 
Total 
  
 1,698,434
1,698,434
1,203,670
 2,101,068
 
Non-Qualified Retirement Benefits            
ITT Excess Savings Plan(3)
 
  
 


 92,085
 
Total 
  
 


 92,085
 
Other Benefits            
Outplacement(4)
 
  
 

5,000
 5,000
 
Health and Welfare(5)
 
  
 

6,798
 6,798
 
Total 
  
 

11,798
 11,798
 
Total(6)
 $
  $
 $1,698,434
$1,698,434
$1,653,968
 $4,507,076
 



63



Luca Savi
 Resignation
Termination 
For Cause
DeathDisabilityTermination Not For CauseTermination Not For Cause or With Good Reason After Change of Control
Cash Severance(1)
            
Salary $
  $
 $
$
$461,760
 $1,385,280
 
AIP 
  
 


 900,432
 
Total 
  
 

461,760
 2,285,712
 
Unvested Equity Award(2)
            
3/5/2013 Option Award 
  
 98,372
98,372
98,372
 98,372
 
3/5/2013 Restricted Stock 
  
 128,246
128,246
128,246
 128,246
 
3/4/2014 Option Award 
  
 


 
 
3/4/2014 Restricted Stock 
  
 153,452
153,452
89,514
 153,452
 
2/25/2015 Option Award 
  
 


 
 
2/25/2015 Restricted Stock 
  
 421,130
421,130
116,981
 421,130
 
2014-2016 Performance Unit Award 
  
 129,118
129,118
86,078
 213,044
 
2015-2017 Performance Unit Award 
  
 147,278
147,278
49,093
 243,008
 
Total 
  
 1,077,596
1,077,596
568,284
 1,257,252
 
Non-Qualified Retirement Benefits            
ITT Excess Savings Plan(3)
 
  
 


 
 
Total 
  
 


 
 
Other Benefits            
Outplacement(4)
 
  
 

5,000
 5,000
 
Health and Welfare(5)
 
  
 


 
 
Total 
  
 

5,000
 5,000
 
Total(6)
 $
  $
 $1,077,596
$1,077,596
$1,035,044
 $3,547,964
 



64



Victoria Creamer
 Resignation
Termination 
For Cause
DeathDisabilityTermination Not For CauseTermination Not For Cause or With Good Reason After Change of Control
Cash Severance(1)
            
Salary $
  $
 $
$
$235,577
 $1,050,000
 
AIP 
  
 


 630,000
 
Total 
  
 

235,577
 1,680,000
 
Unvested Equity Award(2)
            
2/25/2015 Option Award 
  
 


 
 
2/25/2015 Restricted Stock 
  
 167,435
167,435
46,510
 167,435
 
2015-2017 Performance Unit Award 
  
 158,537
158,537
52,846
 261,586
 
Total 
  
 325,972
325,972
99,356
 429,021
 
Non-Qualified Retirement Benefits            
ITT Excess Savings Plan(3)
 
  
 


 63,000
 
Total 
  
 


 63,000
 
Other Benefits            
Outplacement(4)
 
  
 

5,000
 5,000
 
Health and Welfare(5)
 
  
 

6,798
 6,798
 
Total 
  
 

11,798
 11,798
 
Total(6)
 $
  $
 $325,972
$325,972
$346,731
 $2,183,819
 
(1)

Under Ms. Ramos’ employment agreement dated October 4, 2011, described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis under the heading “CEO Compensation and Employment Agreements,” should Ms. Ramos be terminated other than for cause, Ms. Ramos will be entitled to receive severance pay in an amount equal to two times the sum of (x) annual base salary and (y) target annual incentive due toincentive. Under the Senior Executive Severance Pay Plan, as described elsewhere in this Proxy Statement under the heading “Potential Post-Retirement Compensation,” the other NEOs will receive base salary after termination notwithout cause for cause.the following severance period: Mr. Scalera 12 months, Mr. Chicles 12 months, Mr. Savi 12 months and Ms. Creamer 35 weeks. In the event of a change inof control, Ms. Ramos isall NEOs, with the exception of Mr. Savi, are covered under the Company’s Special

Senior Executive Change in Control Severance Pay Plan, described elsewhere in this Proxy Statement under the heading “Potential Post-Retirement Compensation” and, under the terms of the plan, would be paid a lump sum payment equal to the sum of three times (x) annual base salary and (y) target annual incentive.incentive (assumed at target). Mr. Savi’s salary and AIP have been converted from Euro to U.S. dollars using the 2015 average monthly exchange rate of 1.11.

(2)Unvested equity awards reflect the market value of stock and in the money value of stock options based on the Company’s December 31, 20122015 closing stock price of $23.46.$36.32. Termination provisions are set forth in the specific award agreements. Generally, the termination provisions are as follows (unless otherwise noted):

Performance Unit Awards:
If an employee is terminated for cause, or voluntarily terminates employment without an acceleration event, performance unit awards are forfeited on the date of termination.
If an employee dies or becomes disabled, performance unit award vests in full and payment, if any, is made according to its original terms.
If an employee is terminated by the Company other than for cause, a pro-rated payout, if any, is made according to its original terms and is provided based on the number of full months of employment during the performance period divided by 36.
Acceleration Events (as described under the heading “Potential Post-Employment Compensation—Change of Control Arrangements”):
(3)Reflects special Founders’ Grants made on November 7, 2011.

(4)Reflects RSUs granted in recognitionThe performance unit awards vest with an acceleration event and, within two years, a qualifying termination of the uncompleted portionemployee. The payout is based on the greater of: (i) the payout percentage of the 2011-13 TSR Award Period.most recently completed 3-year performance award and (ii) target performance. For the tables above, a factor of 165% was used to calculate the termination value (the payout of the 2013 performance unit award).



65



Retirement:
(5)
Early Retirement (55 years old and 10 years of service): Performance unit awards are pro-rated and vest based on retirement date and a pro-rated payout, if any, is made according to its original terms.
Normal Retirement (65 years old or 62 years old and 10 years of service): Performance unit awards fully vest upon retirement for employees that retire at least 12 months after the beginning of the performance period. The awards will be pro-rated for employees that retire within 12 months of the beginning of the performance period.
RSUs:     
If an employee is terminated for cause, or voluntarily terminates employment without an acceleration event, the RSUs are forfeited on the date of termination.
If an employee dies or becomes disabled, unvested RSUs vest in full.
Termination by the Company for other than cause:
Prior to 2014 awards, RSUs continue to vest through the severance period; and
in 2014 and later awards, vesting does not continue through the severance period.
Acceleration Events:
Prior to 2014 awards, RSUs vested in full upon an acceleration event; and
in 2014 and later awards, vesting does not occur until an acceleration event and, within two years, the termination of employment by the Company or by the employee with good reason.
Retirement:
Early Retirement (55 years old and 10 years of service): unvested RSUs are pro-rated and vested based on retirement date.
Normal Retirement (65 years old or 62 years old and 10 years of service):
prior to 2014 awards, unvested RSUs are pro-rated and vested based on retirement date; and
in 2014 and later awards, unvested RSUs fully vest upon retirement for employees that retire at least 12 months after the grant date. The awards will be pro-rated and vest for employees that retire within 12 months of the beginning of the performance period.
Stock Options
If an employee is terminated for cause, or voluntarily terminates employment without an acceleration event, unvested stock options are forfeited on the date of termination.
If an employee dies or becomes disabled, all unvested stock options vest in full.
If an employee is terminated by the Company other than for cause:
prior to 2014 awards, unvested options at the time of termination of employment are forfeited (the severance period is included as employment); and
in 2014 and later awards, vesting does not continue through the severance period.
Acceleration Events:
prior to 2014 awards, options vested in full upon an acceleration event; and
in 2014 and later awards, vesting does not occur until an acceleration event and, within two years, the termination of employment by the Company or by the employee with good reason.
Retirement:
Early Retirement (55 years old and 10 years of service): Unvested options are pro-rated and vested based on retirement date.
Normal Retirement (65 years old or 62 years old and 10 years of service):
prior to 2014 awards, unvested options are pro-rated and vested based on retirement date; and
in 2014 and later awards, stock options fully vest upon retirement for employees that retire at least 12 months after the grant date. The awards will be pro-rated and vest for employees that retire within 12 months of the grant date.
(3)No additional ITT Excess PensionCorporation Supplemental Retirement Savings Plan payments are made in(formerly known as the event of termination. All benefits under the ITT Excess Pension Plan are payable by Exelis Inc.

(6)No additional ITT Excess Savings PlanPlan) payments are made in the event of voluntary or involuntary termination, or termination for cause. Amount reflects the additional cash payment representing Company contributions, which would be made following a change of control as described in the Special Senior Executive Change in Control Severance Pay Plan described elsewhere in this Proxy Statement under the heading “Potential Post-Retirement Compensation.”



66



(7)
(4)The Company’s Senior Executive Change in Control Severance Pay Plan includes one year of outplacement services. Amounts shown are based on a competitive bid.

(8)
(5)Under Ms. Ramos’ employment agreement, Ms. Ramos will continue to be eligible to participate in Company benefit plans for a period of two years after termination not for cause. Under the Senior Executive Severance Pay Plan, the other NEOs will continue to receive subsidized healthcare benefits during the severance period for the first six months after termination without cause. In the event of a change inof control, Ms. Ramos iswill continue to be eligible to participate in Company benefit plans for a period of three years as outlined in her employment agreement. The other NEOs are covered under the Company’s Special Senior Executive Change in Control Severance Pay Plan, which providesand will receive subsidized healthcare benefits during the severance period for three years continued health and life insurance benefits.the first six months after termination without cause.

(9)
(6)Values in this table show the full payments per the applicable plan documents under the potential termination scenarios. In the event of a change inof control a “best net” provision would apply, which provides either an unreduced benefit or a reduction in payments sufficient to avoid triggering an excise tax, whichever is better after-tax.

   Aris C. Chicles 
   Resignation
($)
  Termination
For Cause
($)
  Death ($)  Disability
($)
  Termination
Not For
Cause ($)
  Termination
Not For
Cause or
With Good
Reason
After
Change of
Control ($)
 

Cash Severance (1)

            

Salary

                  525,000    1,260,000  

AIP

                      945,000  

Total

                  525,000    2,205,000  

Unvested Equity Awards (2)

            

3/5/2010 Option Award

          84,329    84,329    84,329    84,329  

3/5/2010 Restricted Stock

          176,865    176,865    176,865    176,865  

3/3/2011 Option Award

          62,179    62,179    62,179    62,179  

3/3/2011 Restricted Stock

          205,768    205,768    205,768    205,768  

11/7/2011 Option Award

          192,447    192,447    96,224    192,447  

11/7/2011 Restricted Stock (3)

          728,785    728,785    566,833    728,785  

11/7/2011 Restricted Stock (4)

          160,161    160,161    160,161    160,161  

3/8/2012 Option Award

          20,176    20,176        20,176  

3/8/2012 Restricted Stock

          216,090    216,090    144,060    216,090  

2012-2014 TSR Award

      210,000    210,000    157,500    190,050  

Total

          2,056,800    2,056,800    1,653,918    2,036,850  

Non-Qualified Retirement Benefits

            

ITT Excess Pension
Plan (5)

                        

ITT Excess Savings
Plan (6)

                      44,100  

Total

                      44,100  

Other Benefits

            

Outplacement (7)

                  5,000    5,000  

Health and Welfare (8)

                  29,782    44,673  

Total

                  34,782    49,673  

Total (9)

          2,056,800    2,056,800    2,213,700    4,335,623  



67



Other Matters
Equity Compensation Plan Information
The following sets forth information concerning the shares of common stock that may be issued under equity compensation plans as of December 31, 2015.
 Number of Securities to be Issued Upon Exercise of Outstanding Options, Warrants and RightsWeighted-Average Exercise Price of Outstanding Options, Warrants and RightsNumber of Securities Remaining Available for Future Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans
Equity Compensation Plans:   
Approved by Security Holders(1)
3,079,067(2)
$27.10(3)
39,284,157(4)
Not Approved by Security Holders
Total3,079,067$27.1039,284,157
(1)UnderEquity compensation plans approved by shareholders include the Senior Executive Severance Pay2003 Equity Incentive Plan Mr. Chiclesand the 2011 Plan. Since the approval of the 2011 Plan, no additional awards will receive 15 monthsbe granted under the ITT Amended and Restated 2003 Equity Incentive Plan.
(2)This amount includes 1,747,222 shares of base salary after termination without cause,common stock that are issuable upon the exercise of outstanding stock options, 829,804 shares of common stock that are deliverable under restricted stock unit awards and 502,041 shares of common stock that may be issued under outstanding performance unit awards, which includes the 2013 performance unit awards at a 165% payout and the 2014 and 2015 performance unit awards at the target (100%) number of shares that may be issuable under such awards. The weighted-average remaining contractual life of the total number of outstanding options was 6.5 years as disclosed in Note 16 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in the Company’s 2015 Annual Report on Form 10-K. The number of shares, if any, to be issued pursuant to outstanding performance units can range from zero to 200% of the units initially awarded based on our achievement, over a three-year period, of the performance goals described elsewhere in this Proxy StatementStatement.
(3)The weighted-average exercise price pertains only to outstanding options and not to outstanding restricted stock units or performance units, which by their nature have no exercise price.
(4)This amount represents the number of shares available for issuance pursuant to equity awards that may be granted in the future under the heading “Potential Post-Retirement Compensation.” In the event of a change in control, Mr. Chicles is covered under the Company’s Special Senior Executive Severance Pay Plan, described elsewhere in this Proxy Statement under the heading “Potential Post-Retirement Compensation” and, under the terms of the plan, would be paid a lump sum payment equal to the sum of three times (x) annual base salary and (y) target annual incentive.2011 Plan.

(2)Unvested equity awards reflect the market value of stock and in the money value of options based on the Company’s December 31, 2012 closing stock price of $23.46.

(3)Reflects special Founders’ Grants made on November 7, 2011.

(4)Reflects RSUs granted in recognition of the uncompleted portion of the 2011-13 TSR Award Period.

(5)No additional ITT Excess Pension Plan payments are made in the event of termination. All benefits under the ITT Excess Pension Plan are payable by Exelis Inc.

(6)No additional ITT Excess Savings Plan payments are made in the event of voluntary or involuntary termination, or termination for cause. Amount reflects the additional cash payment representing Company contributions, which would be made following a change of control as described in the Special Senior Executive Severance Pay Plan described elsewhere in this Proxy Statement under the heading “Potential Post-Retirement Compensation.”

(7)The Company’s Senior Executive Severance Pay Plan includes one year of outplacement services. Amounts shown are based on a competitive bid.

(8)Under the Senior Executive Severance Plan, Mr. Chicles will continue to receive benefits during the Severance period after termination without cause. In the event of a change in control, Mr. Chicles is covered under the Company’s Special Senior Executive Severance Pay Plan, which provides for three years continued health and life insurance benefits.

(9)Values in this table show the full payments per the applicable plan documents under the potential termination scenarios. In the event of a change in control a “best net” provision would apply, which provides either an unreduced benefit or a reduction in payments sufficient to avoid triggering an excise tax, whichever is better after-tax.

   Thomas M. Scalera 
   Resignation 
($) 
  Termination
For Cause
($)
  

Death

($)

  Disability
($)
  Termination
Not For
Cause ($)
  Termination
Not For
Cause or
With Good
Reason
After
Change of
Control ($)
 

Cash Severance(1)

            

Salary

                  500,000    1,200,000  

AIP

                      900,000  

Total

                  500,000    2,100,000  

Unvested Equity Awards(2)

            

3/5/2010 Option Award

          8,174    8,174    8,174    8,174  

3/5/2010 Restricted Stock

          47,999    47,999    47,999    47,999  

3/3/2011 Option Award

          11,981    11,981    5,991    11,981  

3/3/2011 Restricted Stock

          53,676    53,676    52,185    53,676  

11/7/2011 Option Award

          105,846    105,846    105,846    105,846  

11/7/2011 Restricted
Stock(3)

          400,838    400,838    300,628    400,838  

11/7/2011 Restricted
Stock(4)

          41,782    41,782    41,782    41,782  

3/8/2012 Option Award

          19,216    19,216        19,216  

3/8/2012 Restricted Stock

          205,791    205,791    131,478    205,791  

2012-2014 TSR Award

      200,000    200,000    144,444    181,000  

Total

          1,095,304    1,095,304    838,528    1,076,304  

Non-Qualified Retirement Benefits

            

ITT Excess Pension Plan(5)

                        

ITT Excess Savings Plan(6)

                      42,000  

Total

                      42,000  

Other Benefits

            

Outplacement(7)

                  5,000    5,000  

Health and Welfare(8)

                  29,728    44,592  

Total

                  34,728    49,592  

Total(9)

          1,095,304    1,095,304    1,350,219    3,267,896  

(1)Under the Senior Executive Severance Pay Plan, Mr. Scalera will receive 15 months of base salary after termination without cause, as described described elsewhere in this Proxy Statement under the heading “Potential Post-Retirement Compensation.” In the event of a change in control, Mr. Scalera is covered under the Company’s Special Senior Executive Severance Pay Plan, described described elsewhere in this Proxy Statement under the heading “Potential Post-Retirement Compensation” and, under the terms of the plan, would be paid a lump sum payment equal to the sum of three times (x) annual base salary and (y) target annual incentive.

(2)Unvested equity awards reflect the market value of stock and in the money value of options based on the Company’s December 31, 2012 closing stock price of $23.46.

(3)Reflects special Founders’ Grants made on November 7, 2011.

(4)Reflects RSUs granted in recognition of the uncompleted portion of the 2011-13 TSR Award Period.

(5)No additional ITT Excess Pension Plan payments are made in the event of termination. All benefits under the ITT Excess Pension Plan are payable by Exelis Inc.

(6)No additional ITT Excess Savings Plan payments are made in the event of voluntary or involuntary termination, or termination for cause. Amount reflects the additional cash payment representing Company contributions, which would be made following a change of control as described in the Special Senior Executive Severance Pay Plan described elsewhere in this Proxy Statement under the heading “Potential Post-Retirement Compensation.”

(7)The Company’s Senior Executive Severance Pay Plan includes one year of outplacement services. Amounts shown are based on a competitive bid.

(8)Under the Senior Executive Severance Plan, Mr. Scalera will continue to receive benefits during the Severance period after termination without cause. In the event of a change in control, Mr. Scalera is covered under the Company’s Special Senior Executive Severance Pay Plan, which provides for three years continued health and life insurance benefits.

(9)Values in this table show the full payments per the applicable plan documents under the potential termination scenarios. In the event of a change in control a “best net” provision would apply, which provides either an unreduced benefit or a reduction in payments sufficient to avoid triggering an excise tax, whichever is better after-tax.

   Robert J. Pagano, Jr. 
   Resignation
($)
   Termination
For Cause
($)
   Death ($)   Disability
($)
   Termination
Not For
Cause ($)
  Termination
Not For
Cause or
With Good
Reason
After
Change of
Control ($)
 

Cash Severance(1)

              

Salary

                      800,000    1,200,000  

AIP

                          600,000  

Total

                      800,000    1,800,000  

Unvested Equity Awards(2)

              

3/10/2008 Restricted Stock

            216,207     216,207     216,207    216,090  

3/5/2010 Option Award

            29,288     29,288     29,288    29,288  

3/5/2010 Restricted Stock

            172,454     172,454     172,454    172,454  

3/3/2011 Option Award

            31,924     31,924     31,924    31,924  

3/3/2011 Restricted Stock

            143,176     143,176     143,176    143,176  

11/7/2011 Option Award

            91,641     91,641     91,641    91,641  

11/7/2011 Restricted Stock(3)

            347,044     347,044     347,044    347,044  

11/7/2011 Restricted Stock(4)

            111,365     111,365     111,365    111,365  

3/8/2012 Option Award

            12,811     12,811         12,811  

3/8/2012 Restricted Stock

            137,194     137,194     125,761    137,194  

2012-2014 TSR Award

      133,300     133,300     96,272    120,637  

Total

            1,426,405     1,426,405     1,365,134    1,413,624  

Non-Qualified Retirement Benefits

              

ITT Excess Pension Plan(5)

                            

ITT Excess Savings Plan(6)

                          42,000  

Total

                          42,000  

Other Benefits

              

Outplacement(7)

                      5,000    5,000  

Health and Welfare(8)

                      22,200    33,300  

Total

                      27,200    38,300  

Total (9)

            1,426,405     1,426,405     2,229,361    3,294,041  

(1)Under the Senior Executive Severance Pay Plan, Mr. Pagano will receive 24 months of base salary after termination without cause, as described elsewhere in this Proxy Statement under the heading “Post-Retirement Compensation.” In the event of a change in control, Mr. Pagano is covered under the Company’s Special Senior Executive Severance Pay Plan, described elsewhere in this Proxy Statement under the heading “Potential Post-Retirement Compensation” and, under the terms of the plan, would be paid a lump sum payment equal to the sum of three times (x) annual base salary and (y) target annual incentive.

(2)Unvested equity awards reflect the market value of stock and in the money value of options based on the Company’s December 31, 2012 closing stock price of $23.46.

(3)Reflects special Founders’ Grants made on November 7, 2011.

(4)Reflects RSUs granted in recognition of the uncompleted portion of the 2011-13 TSR Award Period.

(5)No additional ITT Excess Pension Plan payments are made in the event of termination. All benefits under the ITT Excess Pension Plan are payable by Exelis Inc.

(6)No additional ITT Excess Savings Plan payments are made in the event of voluntary or involuntary termination, or termination for cause. Amount reflects the additional cash payment representing Company contributions, which would be made following a change of control as described in the Special Senior Executive Severance Pay Plan described elsewhere in this Proxy Statement under the heading “Potential Post-Retirement Compensation.”

(7)The Company’s Senior Executive Severance Pay Plan includes one year of outplacement services. Amounts shown are based on a competitive bid.

(8)Under the Senior Executive Severance Plan, Mr. Pagano will continue to receive benefits during the Severance period after termination without cause. In the event of a change in control, Mr. Pagano is covered under the Company’s Special Senior Executive Severance Pay Plan, which provides for three years continued health and life insurance benefits.

(9)Values in this table show the full payments per the applicable plan documents under the potential termination scenarios. In the event of a change in control a “best net” provision would apply, which provides either an unreduced benefit or a reduction in payments sufficient to avoid triggering an excise tax, whichever is better after-tax.

   Luca Savi 
   Resignation
($)
   Termination
For Cause
($)
  Death
($)
   Disability
($)
   Termination
Not For
Cause ($)
   Termination
Not For
Cause or
With Good
Reason After
Change of
Control ($)
 

Cash Severance(1)

             

Salary

                     525,849     1,577,547  

AIP

                          709,896  

Total

                     525,849     2,287,443  

Unvested Equity Awards(2)

             

3/8/2012 Option Award

           8,775     8,775          8,775  

3/8/2012 Restricted Stock

           93,981     93,981     54,822     93,981  

2012-2014 TSR Award

       91,300     91,300     60,867     82,627  

Total

           194,055     194,055     115,689     185,382  

Non-Qualified Retirement Benefits

             

National Collective Pension Plan(3)

                            

Total

                            

Other Benefits

             

Outplacement(4)

                     5,000     5,000  

Health and Welfare(5)

                            

Total

                     5,000     5,000  

Total (6)

           194,055     194,055     646,538     2,477,825  

(1)Mr. Savi is not a U.S. employee. In case of termination of the work relationship, the provisions of the law and of the Italian National Collective Agreement for Industrial Sector Managers (the “National Collective Agreement”) would be applicable. Under the National Collective Agreement, if Mr. Savi is terminated by the Company, he would be entitled to a minimum of eight months’ base salary and a maximum of 12 months’ base salary. This table assumes Mr. Savi will receive 12 months of base salary after termination without cause.

(2)Unvested equity awards reflect the market value of stock and in the money value of options based on the Company’s December 31, 2012 closing stock price of $23.46.

(3)Retirement plan participation is in Previndai Pension Fund under the National Collective Agreement for Industrial Sector Managers.

(4)The Company’s Senior Executive Severance Pay Plan includes one year of outplacement services. Amounts shown are based on a competitive bid.

(5)Mr. Savi does not participate in the Senior Executive Severance Pay Plan. Mr. Savi participates under the National Collective Agreement for the Industrial Sector Managers. This agreement provides Mr. Savi with termination benefits in the event his employment is terminated for other than cause.

(6)Values in this table show the full payments per the applicable plan documents under the potential termination scenarios. In the event of a change in control a “best net” provision would apply, which provides either an unreduced benefit or a reduction in payments sufficient to avoid triggering an excise tax, whichever is better after-tax.

Form 10-K
The Company filed its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the 2015 fiscal year with the SEC on February 22, 2016. A copy of the Company’s Form 10-K (without exhibits or documents incorporated by reference) is included in the Annual Report to Shareholders that is being delivered or made available via the Internet concurrently with this Proxy Statement to all shareholders.
By Order of the Board of Directors,
Lori B. Marino
Corporate Secretary
Dated: March 28, 2016



68



Appendix A

List of Companies utilizedUtilized from the 2012 Towers Watson Compensation Data Bank (CDB) Analysis

2015 Benchmark Group -- Towers Watson CDB
(Industrials, Materials, and Energy Companies with Revenue Between $1.25 and $5.0 Billion)
A.O. SmithExelisRollins
ABM IndustriesExterranRowan Companies
AllegionFortune Brands Home & SecuritySensata Technologies
Alliant TechsystemsGATXShawCor
Americas StyrenicsGlatfelterSigma-Aldrich
AMETEKGranite ConstructionSnap-on
Armstrong World IndustriesH.B. FullerSonoco Products
Axiall CorporationHarscoSpirit Airlines
Babcock & WilcoxHerman MillerSPX
Boise CascadeHexcelSteelcase
ChemturaHNIStolt-Nielsen
CintasHubbellSunCoke Energy
Clearwater Paper CorporationInternational Flavors & FragrancesToro
Colfax CorporationKennametalTrinity Industries
CubicKinross GoldTronox
Curtiss-WrightMagellan Midstream PartnersUnited Launch Alliance
CytecMeritorUnited Rentals
DeluxeNortekUSG Corporation
Donaldson CompanyPall CorporationUTi Worldwide
EnergenPitney BowesVulcan Materials
Energy SolutionsPolyOneWestlake Chemical
EnLink MidstreamRegal-BeloitWorthington Industries
EquifaxRockwell CollinsXylem
Esterline Technologies






ITT CORPORATION
1133 WESTCHESTER AVENUE
WHITE PLAINS, NY 10604
WWW.ITT.COM
WE ENCOURAGE YOU TO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF INTERNET OR TELEPHON VOTING. BOTH ARE AVAILABLE 24 HOURS A DAY, 7 DAYS A WEEK.
Telephone and Internet voting are available through 11:59 PM Eastern Daylight Time on May 10, 2016. Your telephone or Internet vote authorizes the named proxies to vote the shares in the same manner as if you marked, signed and returned your proxy card. If you vote your proxy by telephone or on the Internet, you do not need to mail back your proxy card.
VOTE BY TELEPHONE - 1-800-690-6903
Use any touch-tone telephone to vote your proxy. Have your proxy card in hand when you call.
VOTE BY INTERNET - www.proxyvote.com
Use the Internet to vote your proxy. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the website.
VOTE BY MAIL
Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to:
Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717
ELECTRONIC DELIVERY OF FUTURE PROXY MATERIALS
If you would like to reduce the costs incurred by our company in mailing proxy materials, you can consent to receiving all future proxy statements, proxy cards and annual reports electronically via e-mail or the Internet. To sign up for electronic delivery, please follow the instructions above to vote using the Internet and, when prompted, indicate that you agree to receive or access proxy materials electronically in future years.
TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS:E00055-P72194KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS
DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY
THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED
A.O. SmithITT CORPORATION Education Management Magellan Midstream
Partners
 Underwriters Laboratories
Acxiom Endo Health Solutions Manitowoc Unisys
American Water WorksThe Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR each of these ten nominees: Energy Solutions
The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR
Proposals 2, 3 and 4:
Proposal 1: Election of Directors
 Martin Marietta Materials United Rentals
Americas Styrenics EnPro IndustriesForAgainstAbstain
Nominees:ForAgainstAbstain Meredith
Proposal 2: Ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm of the Company for the 2016 fiscal year
¨¨¨
1a.   Orlando D. Ashford¨¨¨ University of Maryland
Medical Center
AMETEK1b.  G. Peter D'Aloia¨¨¨ Equifax
1c.  Geraud Darnis¨¨¨ Molson Coors Brewing
Proposal 3: Approval of an advisory vote on executive compensation
¨¨¨
1d.  Donald DeFosset, Jr.¨¨¨ University of Texas - M.D.
Anderson Cancer Center
Amtrak1e.  Christina A. Gold¨¨¨ Esterline Technologies
Proposal 4: Reapproval of performance measures under the ITT Corporation 2011 Omnibus Incentive Plan
¨¨¨
1f.  Richard P. Lavin¨¨¨ MoneyGram International
1g.  Frank T. MacInnis¨¨¨ Valmont Industries
Armstrong World Industries1h.  Rebecca A. McDonald¨¨¨ Expedia
The Board of Directors recommends a vote AGAINST
Proposal 5:
1i.  Timothy H. Powers¨¨¨ New York University
1j.  Denise L. Ramos¨¨¨ Vertex Pharmaceuticals
Proposal 5: Shareholder proposal regarding a payout policy
¨¨¨
Barnes Group Exterran Nu Skin Enterprises Visiting Nurse Service of
NY
Beam Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas OMNOVA Solutions Visiting Nurse Service of
NY
Bob Evans Farms Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Pall Corporation Vulcan Materials
Brady
For address changes and/or comments, please check this box and write them on the back where indicated: ¨
 GATX Phoenix Companies
 Warner Chilcott
Brunswick Green MountainYesNo Plexus Wendy’s Group
CareFusion H.B. Fuller
Please indicate if you plan to attend this meeting:¨¨ Polaris Industries Westlake Chemical
Carpenter Technology Harman International Industries
 PolyOne Xylem
CEC Educational Services Harsco Premera Blue Cross 
Century Aluminum Herman Miller
(NOTE: Please sign exactly as your name or names appear(s) on this Proxy Card. When signing as attorney, executor, officer, administrator, trustee, custodian or guardian, please indicate full title. If there is more than one named shareholder, all should sign unless evidence or authority to sign on behalf of others is attached.)
 Rayonier 
Chemtura Hexcel Revlon 
Chiquita Brands HNI
 Savannah River Nuclear
Solutions
 
Cintas IDEXX Laboratories Scotts Miracle-Gro 
Cloud Peak Energy Intercontinental Hotels
Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX]Date ShawCorSignature (Joint Owners, if applicable)Date 
CoinstarInternational Flavors & FragrancesSigma-Aldrich
Columbia SportswearInternational Game TechnologySnap-on
ConvergysItronStanford University
CovanceJack in the BoxStepan Company
Crown CastleK. Hovnanian Companies LLCTeleTech Holdings
Curtiss-WrightKansas City SouthernTeradata
Deckers OutdoorKB HomeThe Auto Club Group
DeluxeKennametalToro
DentsplyKinross GoldTower International
Dex OneLeggett and PlattTrinity Industries
Dollar Thrifty Automotive GroupLife TechnologiesTronox
DonaldsonLincoln ElectricTupperware Brands




Appendix B

ITT Corporation Annual Incentive Plan For Executive Officers

(amended and restated as of January 1, 2013)

1.    Purpose

The purpose of this ITT Corporation Annual Incentive Plan for Executive Officers (the “Incentive Plan”) is to provide incentive compensation in the form of a cash award to executive officers of ITT Corporation (the “Company”) for achieving specific pre-established performance objectives and to continue to motivate participating executive officers to achieve their business goals, while tying a portion of their compensation to measures affecting shareholder value. The Incentive Plan seeks to enable the Company to continue to be competitive in its ability to attract and retain executive officers of the highest caliber.

It is intended that compensation payable under the Incentive Plan will qualify as “performance-based compensation,” within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”) and regulations promulgated thereunder, if such qualification is desired.

2.    Plan Administration

The Compensation and Personnel Committee (the “Committee”) of the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of the Company, as constituted by the Board from time to time, shall be comprised completely of “outside directors” as defined under Section 162(m) of the Code.

The Committee shall have full power and authority to administer, construe and interpret the provisions of the Incentive Plan and to adopt and amend administrative rules and regulations, agreements, guidelines and instruments for the administration of the Incentive Plan and for the conduct of its business as the Committee considers appropriate.

Except with respect to matters which under Section 162(m) of the Code are required to be determined in the sole and absolute discretion of the Committee, the Committee shall have full power, to the extent permitted by law, to delegate its authority to any officer or employee of the Company to administer and interpret the procedural aspects of the Incentive Plan, subject to the terms of the Incentive Plan, including adopting and enforcing rules to decide procedural and administrative issues.

The Committee may rely on opinions, reports or statements of officers or employees of the Company and of counsel to the Company (inside or retained counsel), public accountants and other professional or expert persons.

The Board reserves the right to amend or terminate the Incentive Plan in whole or in part at any time; provided, however, that except as necessary to maintain an outstanding incentive award’s qualification as performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) of the Code (“Performance-Based Compensation”), no amendments shall adversely affect or impair the rights of any participant that have previously accrued hereunder, without the written consent of the participant. Unless otherwise prohibited by applicable law, any amendment required to cause an incentive award to qualify as Performance-Based Compensation may be made by the Committee. No amendment to the Incentive Plan may be made to alter the class of individuals who are eligible to participate in the Incentive Plan, the performance criteria specified in Section 4 hereof or the maximum incentive award payable to any participant without shareholder approval unless shareholder approval of the amendment is not required in order for incentive awards paid to participants to constitute Performance-Based Compensation.

No member of the Committee shall be liable for any action taken or omitted to be taken or for any determination made by him or her in good faith with respect to the Incentive Plan, and the Company shall indemnify and hold harmless each member of the Committee against any cost or expense (including counsel fees) or liability (including any sum paid in settlement of a claim with the approval of the Committee) arising out of any act or omission in connection with the administration or interpretation of the Incentive Plan, unless arising out of such person’s own fraud or bad faith.

3.    Eligible Executives

Executive officers of the Company and its subsidiaries, as defined by the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Rule 3b-7, as that definition may be amended from time to time, shall be eligible to participate in the Incentive Plan. The Committee shall select from all eligible executive officers, those to whom incentive awards shall be granted under the Incentive Plan.

4.    Plan Year, Performance Periods, Performance Measures and Performance Targets

Each fiscal year of the Incentive Plan (the “Plan Year”) shall begin on January 1 and end on December 31. The performance period (the “Performance Period”) with respect to which incentive awards may be payable under the Incentive Plan shall be the Plan Year unless the Committee designates one or more different Performance Periods.

The Committee shall establish the performance measures (the “Performance Measures”) to be used which may include, one or more of the following criteria: (i) consolidated earnings before or after taxes (including earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization); (ii) net income; (iii) operating income; (iv) earnings per share; (v) book value per share; (vi) return on shareholders’ equity; (vii) expense management; (viii) return on investment; (ix) improvements in capital structure; (x) profitability of an identifiable business unit or product; (xi) profit margins; (xii) stock price; (xiii) market share; (xiv) revenues or sales (including organic revenue); (xv) costs; (xvi) cash flow; (xvii) working capital (xviii) return on assets; (xix) total shareholder return; (xx) return on invested or total capital and (xxi) economic value added.

In addition, to the extent consistent with Section 162(m) of the Code, Performance Measures may be based upon other objectives such as negotiating transactions or sales, implementation of Company policy, development of long-term business goals or strategic plans, negotiation of significant corporate transactions, meeting specified market penetration goals, productivity measures, geographic business expansion goals, cost targets, customer satisfaction or employee satisfaction goals, goals relating to merger synergies, management of employment practices and employee benefits, or supervision of litigation and information technology, and goals relating to acquisitions or divestitures of subsidiaries and/or other affiliates or joint ventures; provided however, that the measurement of any such Performance Measures must be objectively determinable.

All Performance Measures shall be objectively determinable and, to the extent they are expressed in standard accounting terms, shall be according to generally accepted accounting principles as in existence on the date on which the applicable Performance Period is established and without regard to any changes in such principles after such date (unless the modification of a Performance Measure to take into account such a change is pre-established in writing at the time the Performance Measures are established in writing by the Committee and/or the modification would not affect the ability of the incentive award to qualify as Performance-Based Compensation).

Notwithstanding the foregoing, incentive awards that are not intended to qualify as Performance-Based Compensation may be based on the Performance Measures described above or such other measures as the Committee may determine.

The Committee shall establish the performance targets (the “Performance Targets”) to be achieved which shall be based on one or more Performance Measures relating to the Company as a whole or to the specific businesses of the Company, subsidiaries, operating groups, or operating units, as determined by the Committee. Performance Targets may be established on such terms as the Committee may determine, in its discretion, including in absolute terms, as a goal relative to performance in prior periods, or as a goal compared to the performance of one or more comparable companies or an index covering multiple companies. The Committee also shall establish with respect to each incentive award an objective formula to be used in calculating the amount of incentive award each participant shall be eligible to receive. There may be a sliding scale of payment dependent upon the percentage levels of achievement of Performance Targets.

The Performance Measures and Performance Targets, which may be different with respect to each participant and each Performance Period, must be set forth in writing by the Committee within the first ninety (90) days of the applicable Performance Period or, if sooner, prior to the time when 25 percent of the relevant Performance Period has elapsed.

5.    Certification of Performance Targets and Calculation of Incentive Awards

After the end of each Performance Period, and prior to the payment for such Performance Period, the Committee must certify in writing the degree to which the Performance Targets for the Performance Period were achieved, including the specific target objective or objectives and the satisfaction of any other material terms of the incentive award. The Committee shall calculate the amount of each participant’s incentive award for such Performance Period based upon the Performance Measures and Performance Targets for such participant. In establishing Performance Targets and Performance Measures and in calculating the degree of achievement thereof, the Committee may ignore extraordinary items, property transactions, changes in accounting standards and losses or gains arising from discontinued operations. The Committee shall have no authority or discretion to increase the amount of any participant’s incentive award as so determined to the extent such incentive award is intended to qualify as Performance-Based Compensation, but it may reduce the amount or totally eliminate any such incentive award if it determines in its absolute and sole discretion that such action is appropriate in order to reflect the participant’s performance or unanticipated factors during the Performance Period. The Committee shall have the authority to increase or decrease the amount of an incentive award to the extent the incentive award is not intended to qualify as Performance-Based Compensation.

The maximum payment that may be made with respect to incentive awards under the Plan to any participant in any one calendar year shall be $8,000,000.

6.    Payment of Awards

Approved incentive awards shall be payable by the Company in cash to each participant, or to the participant’s estate in the event of the participant’s death, as soon as practicable (and in any event no later than 2-1/2 months) after the end of each Performance Period. No incentive award that is intended to qualify as Performance-Based Compensation may be paid under the Incentive Plan until the Committee has certified in writing that the relevant Performance Targets were achieved. If a participant is not an employee on the last day of the Performance Period, the Committee shall have sole discretion to determine what portion, if any, the participant shall be entitled to receive with respect to any award for the Performance Period. The Committee shall have the authority to adopt appropriate rules and regulations for the administration of the Incentive Plan in such termination cases.

The Company retains the right to deduct from any incentive awards paid under the Incentive Plan any Federal, state, local or foreign taxes required by law to be withheld with respect to such payment.

Notwithstanding the above, no incentive awards shall be paid under the Incentive Plan unless the Incentive Plan is approved by the requisite shareholders of the Company.

7.    Other Terms and Conditions

Any award made under this Incentive Plan shall be subject to the discretion of the Committee. No person shall have any legal claim to be granted an award under the Incentive Plan and the Committee shall have no obligation to treat participants uniformly. Except as may be otherwise required by law, incentive awards under the Incentive Plan shall not be subject in any manner to anticipation, alienation, sale, transfer, assignment, pledge, encumbrance, charge, garnishment, execution, or levy of any kind, either voluntary or involuntary. Incentive awards granted under the Incentive Plan shall be payable from the general assets of the Company, and no participant shall have any claim with respect to any specific assets of the Company.

Nothing contained in the Incentive Plan shall give any participant the right to continue in the employment of the Company or affect the right of the Company to terminate the employment of a participant.

8.    Acceleration Event.

An “Acceleration Event” shall occur if (i) a report on Schedule 13D shall be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 13(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Act”) disclosing that any person (within the meaning of Section 13(d) of the Act), other than the Company or a subsidiary of the Company or any employee benefit plan sponsored by the Company or a subsidiary of the Company, is the beneficial owner directly or indirectly of twenty percent (20%) or more of the outstanding Common Stock $1 par value, of the Company (the “Stock”); (ii) any person (within the meaning of Section 13(d) of the Act), other than the Company or a subsidiary of the Company, or any employee benefit plan sponsored by the Company or a subsidiary of the Company, shall purchase shares pursuant to a tender offer or exchange offer to acquire any Stock (or securities convertible into Stock) for cash, securities or any other consideration, provided that after consummation of the offer, the person in question is the beneficial owner (as such term is defined in Rule 13d-3 under the Act), directly or indirectly, of twenty percent (20%) or more of the outstanding Stock (calculated as provided in paragraph (d) of Rule 13d-3 under the Act in the case of rights to acquire Stock); (iii) the consummation of (A) any consolidation, business combination or merger involving the Company, other than a consolidation, business combination or merger involving the Company in which holders of Stock immediately prior to the consolidation, business combination or merger (x) hold fifty percent (50%) or more of the combined voting power of the Company (or the corporation resulting from the merger or consolidation or the parent of such corporation) after the merger and (y) have the same proportionate ownership of common stock of the Company (or the corporation resulting from the merger or consolidation or the parent of such corporation), relative to other holders of Stock immediately prior to the merger, business combination or consolidation, immediately after the merger as immediately before, or (B) any sale, lease, exchange or other transfer (in one transaction or a series of related transactions) of all or substantially all the assets of the Company, (iv) there shall have been a change in a majority of the members of the Board within a 12-month period unless the election or nomination for election by the Company’s stockholders of each new director during such 12-month period was approved by the vote of two-thirds of the directors then still in office who (x) were directors at the beginning of such 12-month period or (y) whose nomination for election or election as directors was recommended or approved by a majority of the directors who were directors at the beginning of such 12-month period or (v) any person (within the meaning of Section 13(d) of the Act) (other than the Company or any subsidiary of the Company or any employee benefit plan (or related trust) sponsored by the Company or a subsidiary of the Company) becomes the beneficial owner (as such term is defined in Rule 13d-3 under the Act) of twenty percent (20%) or more of the Stock.

Upon the occurrence of such Acceleration Event, the Performance Measures for each Performance Period with respect to which incentive awards may be payable under the Incentive Plan shall be deemed to be achieved at the greater of (i) the Performance Target established for such Performance Measures or (ii) the Company’s actual achievement of such Performance Measures as of the Acceleration Event. Payment of the incentive awards, for the full year, will be made to each participant, in cash, within five (5) business days following such Acceleration Event.

9.    Miscellaneous.

The Incentive Plan, as amended and restated, shall be effective as of January 1, 2013 subject to the approval of the requisite shareholders of the Company. Once approved, the Incentive Plan shall remain in effect unless/until terminated by the Board; provided, however, that if an Acceleration Event has occurred no amendment or termination shall impair the rights of any participant with respect to any prior award.

This Incentive Plan shall be construed and governed in accordance with the laws of the State of New York.

LOGO




ADMISSION TICKET
Annual Meeting of Shareholders
Wednesday, May 11, 2016

9:00 a.m., EDT on Tuesday, May 7, 2013

Eastern Daylight Time

ITT Corporation Headquarters

1133 Westchester Avenue

White Plains, NY 10604

PLEASE PRESENT THIS CARD AT THE ENTRANCE TO THE MEETING ROOM

Note:

Shareholders will be admitted to the Annual Meeting beginning at 8:30 a.m. Eastern Daylight Time.
If you wish to attend, please plan to arrive early since seating will be limited. For directions, contact us at (914) 641-2000.
If you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, of Shareholders,please bring this admission ticket with you.
Note: If you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, please indicate your intention to attend by marking the appropriate box on the attached proxy card. If you plan to attend the Annual Meeting in person, please bring, in addition to this Admission Ticket, a proper form of identification. The use of video, still photography or audio recording at the Annual Meeting is not permitted. For the safety of attendees, all bags, packages and briefcases are subject to inspection. Your compliance is appreciated.

This Admission Ticket should not be returned with your proxy but should be retained and brought with you to the Annual Meeting.

SEC Proxy Access Notice

Important Notice Regarding the Internet Availability of Proxy Materials for the ShareholderAnnual Meeting of Shareholders to be held at 9:00 a.m., EDTEastern Daylight Time on Wednesday, May 11, 2016 at ITT Corporation Headquarters, 1133 Westchester Avenue, White Plains, NY 10604:

The proxy materials for ITT’s 20132016 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, including the 20122015 Annual Report and the 20132016 Notice and Proxy Statement are available on the Internet. To view these proxy materials, please visit https://www.proxydocs.com/itt.

— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

M54806-P32409

www.proxyvote.com.
  

LOGO

PROXY SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF ITT CORPORATION

FOR THE ANNUAL MEETING TO BE HELD MAY 7, 2013

11, 2016

The shareholder(s) whose signature(s) appear(s) on the reverse side of this proxy form hereby appoint(s) Aris C. Chicles, Thomas M. Scalera and Burt M. Fealing,Mary E. Gustafsson, or anyeither of them, each with full power of substitution as proxies, to vote all shares of ITT Corporation common stock that the shareholder(s) would be entitled to vote on all matters that may properly come before the 2013 Annual Meeting and at any adjournments or postponements. The proxies are authorized to vote in accordance with the specifications indicated by the shareholder(s) on the reverse side of this form. If this form is signed and returned by the shareholder(s), and no specifications are indicated, the proxies are authorized to vote as recommended by the Board of Directors.In either case, if this form is signed and returned, the proxies thereby will be authorized to vote in their discretion on any other matters that may be presented for a vote at the meetingAnnual Meeting and at adjournments or postponements.postponements

.

For participants in the ITT Salaried Investment andRetirement Savings Plan:

Under the savings plan, participants are “named fiduciaries” to the extent of their authority to direct the voting of ITT shares credited totheir savings plan accounts and their proportionate share of allocated shares for which no direction is received and unallocated shares, if any (together,(together, “Undirected Shares”). ITT SalariedRetirement Savings Plan participants should mail their confidential voting instruction card toBroadridge Financial Solutions, Inc., acting as tabulation agent, or vote by Phonetelephone or Internet. Instructions must be received by Broadridgebefore 11:59 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time on May 2, 2013.8, 2016. The trustee of the savings plansplan will vote Undirected Shares in the same proportionas the shares for which directions are received, except as otherwise provided in accordance with ERISA. By submitting voting instructions bytelephone, Internet, or by signing and returning this voting instruction card,proxy form, you direct the trustee of the savings plansplan to vote these shares, inperson or by proxy, as designated herein, at the 2013 Annual Meeting of stockholders.

.

The Trustee will exercise its discretion in voting on any other matter that may be presented for a vote at the meetingAnnual Meeting and at adjournments or postponements.

 

Address Changes/Comments: 

(If you noted any Address Changes/Comments above, please mark corresponding box on the reverse side.)

(Continued and to be dated and signed on the reverse side.)


LOGO

ITT CORPORATION

1133 WESTCHESTER AVENUE

WHITE PLAINS, NY 10604

WWW.ITT.COM

WE ENCOURAGE YOU TO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF INTERNET OR TELEPHONE VOTING. BOTH ARE AVAILABLE 24 HOURS A DAY, 7 DAYS A WEEK.

Internet and telephone voting are available through 11:59 PM Eastern Time the day before the 2013 Annual Meeting. Your Internet or telephone vote authorizes the named proxies to vote the shares in the same manner as if you marked, signed and returned your proxy card. If you vote your proxy by Internet or by telephone, you do not need to mail back your proxy card.

VOTE BY INTERNET -www.proxyvote.com

Use the Internet to vote your proxy. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the website.

VOTE BY TELEPHONE - 1-800-690-6903

Use any touch-tone telephone to vote your proxy. Have your proxy card in hand when you call.

VOTE BY MAIL

Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717.

ELECTRONIC DELIVERY OF FUTURE PROXY MATERIALS

If you would like to reduce the costs incurred by our company in mailing proxy materials, you can consent to receiving all future proxy statements, proxy cards and annual reports electronically via e-mail or the Internet. To sign up for electronic delivery, please follow the instructions above to vote using the Internet and, when prompted, indicate that you agree to receive or access proxy materials electronically in future years.

TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS:

M54805-P32409                 KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORD

— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

        DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY

THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED.                        

ITT CORPORATION

        
  

    THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE

    “FOR” PROPOSALS 1, 2, 3 AND 4.

    Vote on Directors

    1.Election of eight members of the Board of Directors.ForAgainstAbstain

Nominees:

Vote on ProposalsForAgainstAbstain

1a.   Denise L. Ramos

1b.  Frank T. MacInnis

1c.  Orlando D. Ashford

¨

¨

¨

¨

¨

¨

¨

¨

¨

2.

Ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as ITT’s Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for 2013.

¨

¨

¨

1d.  Peter D’Aloia

1e.  Donald DeFosset, Jr.

¨

¨

¨

¨

¨

¨

3.

Approval of the material terms of the ITT Corporation Annual Incentive Plan for Executive Officers.

¨

¨

¨

1f.  Christina A. Gold

¨

¨

¨

1g.  Richard P. Lavin

1h.  Donald J. Stebbins

¨

¨

¨

¨

¨

¨

4.To approve, in a non-binding vote, the 2012 compensation of our named executive officers.¨¨¨

For address changes and/or comments, please check this box and write them on the back where indicated.

¨

Please indicate if you plan to attend this meeting.

¨¨
YesNo

(When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, trustee or guardian, give full title. If more than one trustee, all should sign.)

Address Changes / Comments:     
        
        
(If you noted any Address Changes/Comments above, please mark corresponding box on the reverse side.)
Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX]DateSignature (Joint Owners)Date(Continued and to be dated and signed on the reverse side.)